Jump to content

Talk:Kim Ok-vin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Belov (talk | contribs) at 20:14, 20 November 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconBiography: Actors and Filmmakers Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconKorea Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Korean popular culture working group.

Changes to article by User:Belov

A more thorough explanation of why these are not good changes:

  • Kim Ok-bin, not Kim Ok Bin; please see WP:NC-KO regarding given names.
  • The text added to the lead is a copyvio [1] and unencyclopedic in tone.
  • The "Career" section is focused on that aspect of her life. Merging the part about her martial arts and renaming it "Biography" is not good because it's less specific and combining two unrelated things.
  • "Controversy" does not make a good section heading because it's a subjective term; see this edit.
  • Filmographies should be presented in chronologicla order and in table format; see relevant sections of MOS:WORKS and WP:FILMBIO.
  • Trivia sections should be avoided per WP:TRIVIA and the content here is unsourced; [2] is not a reliable source.
  • Gallery is unnecessary per WP:IG.

Reverting these changes does not constitute "vandalism" as they are contrary to policy and MOS guidelines. Please discuss before continuing to restore this content to the article. PC78 (talk) 19:45, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My edits

The sections of the article weren't adequate. Martial arts was only 1 sentence and could have been placed in with the Career section thus turning it into Bio section. An article doesn't have to have so many sections. I believe sections should be used for significant events or situations in a person's life. For example the Biography should cover practical incidents, while sections should cover special events like, if OK-bin became a singer that would be sectioned off because her primary job is acting, or if she is a president to a major charity company.

Trivia I will remove cause it goes against wiki policy. I will integrate it into the content.

In The Media doesn't match the content below. Criticism seems more precise. I didn't put Controversy that's Refsworldlee's edit edit

As for the table under Filmography the dramas are mixed up with the films and you tell what is which. And such short film section doesn't require a table.

Gallery will be removed you are right. Belov 20:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing wrong with having short sections, and they shouldn't be merged just because they are short. The entire article is a biography, so sections titled "biography" are redundant and too generic. You restored the "Controversy" section heading that was removed by Refsworldlee. Dramas were clearly identified as such in the table, and it makes no difference how short the filmography is. PC78 (talk) 20:11, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No I didn't restore the Controversy if you look at the link it has your name then the other editors name. Belov 20:14, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kim_Ok-vin&oldid=326985855"