Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2005 December 24

December 24

* Image:Human feces.jpg - not useful, plus is nasty. -- **Delete, I agree, it's also an orphan, I think. -- Joe 042293 18:24, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ari1.jpg — UE, Wallpaper image not useful in our encyclopedia. --Adnghiem501 00:13, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Object (Keep) I uploaded this image in accordance with policy. That image states it's source and that it is public domain. There is no violation what-so-ever. Saying that it is "not useful in our encyclopedia" is Adnghiem501's POV. Tony the Marine 03:27, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Object aka Keep Wallpaper image is still an image. The image is in good taste and is public domain. There is nothing in policy that states a wallpaper image cannot be used. Antonio Martin 03:20, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Object, i.e. Keep; I don't see anything wrong with using it. It's in good taste, it illustrates the subject, and it's PD. Antandrus (talk) 03:48, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep, bad faith nomination. I suggest this proposal be removed immediately. -- Natalinasmpf 03:58, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- keep can't see anything wrong with this. why was it even nominated for deletion? Grutness...wha? 04:11, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: this image is in good taste, is in the public domain, and illustrates a biographical article. The "unencyclopedic" claim is childish at best and I can only assume bad faith on the part of the nominator. David Cannon 04:43, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It looks fine to me. -Willmcw 04:45, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I agree with all others. Adnghiem501 04:59, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm confused. There's nothing objectionable aboutthe image itself; it's entirely suitable for illustrating the article. The page it comes from says "Copyright © AriMeyers.com" [1], and the image is a link to a larger version which says "Ari Meyers Online" and "AriMeyers.com". Why do we believe the image is public domain?-gadfium 05:25, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The image which is on "Ari Meyers Online" and "AriMeyers.com" are the "Free Wallpaper" versions and free wallpapers are for public use. Tony the Marine 06:54, 24 December 2005 (UTC).[reply]
- The image Marine 69-71 uploaded isn't made of wallpaper, yet I found a similar image with high-resolution that might be the wallpaper: [2] -Adnghiem501 06:25, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speey Keep. It is a wallpaper image found in http://www.arimeyers.com/wallpapers.html, and its use is encyclopedic to illustrate Ari Meyers. Nomination is unjustified. --Vizcarra 09:19, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- KEEP: What's wrong with this image?!? "Wallpaper image not useful in our encyclopedia" is a subjective term and is not enough argument to justify the deletion. – MusiCitizen 14:04, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - www.arimeyers.com is a fan site -- not the young lady's official site. Her fans are not authorized to say which images of her are in the public domain. The fan who compiled the images doesn't say where they got them from. So, we have no real idea of the original source to this picture. I contend it would be a mistake to assume it is a PD image. -- Geo Swan 15:23, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The image comes from [3] and as a wallpaper or screensaver, it is assumed in good faith that that the same is public domain. Antonio Martin 17:01, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep. I don't see why it's not encyclopedic. Sebastian Kessel ^Talk 20:27, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep - what possible complaint can there be at this picture? - she looks goods too!Brookie :) - a collector of little round things! ^(Talk!) 20:34, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep per everyone above. Linuxbeak (drop me a line) 03:58, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Investigate as copyright infringement -- I don't know that there's any reason to call it unencyclopedic, but there are very clear indications that this image is not public domain at all. IT's not an official site. The person who made it into wallpaper does not have any copyright to the image in the first place, so absolutely cannot declare it to be public domain on the photographer's behalf. It may be "good faith" to assume other editors are working with best intentions in mind, but it definitely is NOT good faith to assume a photo taken from a fan site is public domain, any more than assuming that some gy with a website selling copies of Microsoft Office on CDs without manuals for $10 each is legal either. So the votes above can certainly decide that it's encyclopedic and a good image, but you can't just vote to ignore copyright infringement. DreamGuy 19:25, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (or investigate). As per Geo Swan and DreamGuy. It's a perfectly cromulent picture but we don't have clear proof that it's PD. FreplySpang (talk) 19:51, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Hold it, Hold it Don't vote Delete because you've come to the conclusion that there is a "possible" copyright violation. I agree that it would be O.K. to investigate the possibility, however that would be a total different issue and until that is done we can't assume that there has been a violation at all and delete the image on that assumption until it is proven as such. This image was nominated becuase of "UE" (See nomination above) and not becuase of "CV". Please, let's stick to the issue involved. Tony the Marine 03:58, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Pleiades half.jpg. This image is a retouched image uploaded for aFP nomination of Image:Pleiades large.jpg. Image:Pleiades half.jpg was the promoted version, so I have uploaded it over Image:Pleiades large.jpg. Image:Pleiades half.jpg is now redundant. Raven4x4x 04:54, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Redcap (Mythological creature).gif – CV from http://webhome.idirect.com/~donlong/monsters/Html/Redcap.htm – Clockwork Soul 07:38, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Honda template.gif - Obsolete -- SGBailey 08:09, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:VFD XMPL.gif - Obsolete -- SGBailey 08:09, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The following are blank image pages which have no link to an image on EN (note the lack of a "File history" section, but for which there is an identically named image on the Commons. The solution is (presumably) to delete the EN image description page.