User talk:Mo0

All discussions previous to November 9, 2005, have been archived. View the archive here.

RE: SUPER SPEED!

Heh thanks for trying! I have updated my vandal count thing, it is contained in a subpage, here. Thanks again, Fir e Fo x 19:59, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Gold farmer

Hmm... the issue that would come into play here is probably Wikipedia:Cite sources. If 205.219.133.241 wishes to add information such as this or this, he should provide reliable sources to ensure it doesn't violate WP:NPOV or WP:NOR, whatever the editor's intentions may be. Hope this helps. Regards, Sango 123 (talk) 02:07, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Closing AFDs

I appreciate you closing AFD debates, but please add the top tag above the header with the name of the article as I did in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pomparius. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:52, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

'sup Mo0?

OMG! You are at teh Wikipedias! LET'S EDIT SOME PAGES --Kaleb.G 03:57, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Crystal Palace AfD debate.

Thanks for participating, although that more or less goes without saying.

I won't argue with you on the weak delete vote, as that's your prerogative and I'm nobody to comment on that. I have, however, made a few addenda to my nomination to clarify the point. I hate being seen as capricious and arbitrary--I try not to be, y'know?--so I've done my best to explain why the nomination was made. Thought you might want to take a look, just to remove any potential appearance of bad faith, et cetera.

Thanks much and happy editing. Tom Lillis 11:03, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The 50 is for concurrent users, not total users. The owner claims to have over two thousand active users right now, and tens of thousands of unique accounts having been created over its history. Active is defined as having logged in within the past few months. 68.83.85.175 15:33, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

But you need 5,000 concurrent users to qualify for Wikipedia. Ergo, around 100-150 users on at a time. It's a pretty clear guideline. Ergo, unless there are other claims to notoriety, its not a difficult vote. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 05:30, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biological evolution (disambiguation)

Hi, Just FYI, I figure that Ed's closing comments are a valid part of the discussion. So I've moved them back inside the don't edit block. Regards, Ben Aveling 07:36, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, Ed made it a bit confusing. He put a section break in front of the comment, so perhaps it wasn't intended to be part of the discussion. But even if that was the intent, I think it should be kept with the rest anyway. Regards, Ben Aveling 07:40, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please Leave The Myspace Alone on Shane's Bio.

This MySpace Site has been Confirmed by the source. If you have any problems or Questions Please Contact Permission@wwe.com Thank You.

The preceding unsigned comment was left by User:Gottiman.

Fuck Off

Fuck off

Is very appropriate language as far as I'm concerned

The preceding two comments were left by User:80.47.187.140 after I reverted a vandalism edit he made. The first was made under the Myspace comment. This comment is here just to fulfill my anal-retentive need to have everything in its place AND to have everything properly archived.

Vandalism

No, I'm not here to post a nasty test 3 or 4 - I'm just here to say thanks for the reversion of the rather childish vandalism on my user page. I probably would have got to it myself, but I obviously wasn't in at the time, but nonetheless, thanks a bunch. --Master Jay 02:40, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

Congratulations! It's my pleasure to let you know that, consensus being reached, you are now an administrator. You should read the relevant policies and other pages linked to from the administrators' reading list before carrying out tasks like deletion, protection, banning users, and editing protected pages such as the Main Page. Most of what you do is easily reversible by other sysops, apart from page history merges and image deletion, so please be especially careful with those. You might find the new administrators' how-to guide helpful. Cheers! -- Cecropia 05:37, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, and you're quite welcome! My signature doesn't work because it gets displayed as all code. :/ --King of All the Franks 06:41, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats, fellow member of the ancient mystical order of admins.--Alhutch 08:53, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re:support

Not a problem. Zordrac's lone opposition was one the weakest arguments I've ever read, though he supported mine. Confusing, I know. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 06:33, Dec. 17, 2005

No problem. I also think that Zordrac's one oppose was silly--he opposed me because being here for about 6 months made me a "total newbie." But you and I made it, so congratulations. :)

P.S. I'm not InShanee. :)--Shanel 06:45, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've also stolen the design you used for your little thank you box thing. :P--Shanel 06:59, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for thanking me

--Adam1213 Talk + 07:30, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

anger

you better shut your little butt ill unleash a computer virus that will destroy wikipedia forever.no i am just joking i am sorry i will not vandalise again

                             hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Congratulations

Congrats! You'll be a great admin. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 15:14, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Somewhat belated congrats! HGB 15:58, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for fixing my page

Thanks for fixing the Florian Segginger page which is the article about myself =P

I can't believe some people are that immature. Oh well, that's the internet for ya

--TrashLock 21:21, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Block

Glad to amuse :"D, the anon also thought it was innappropriate given an another anon would encounter that brief and cryptic reason for their block. I'd like to think more users complaining with encounters like that would make AOL tweak their IP policy. But that's just my optimism talking. - Roy Boy ⁸⁰⁰ 07:01, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Adventurer restored

Hi, MoO. I notice you made Adventurer into a redirect to Adventure. I restored it, since I don't think the terms are strictly identical:

Non-adventurers can go an an adventure
a Victorian "adventuress" doesn't really have to do with "adventure", more with "gold-digging"
especially in role-playing games, "adventurer" is a specific profession, separate from the adventure itself
Finally, "Adventure" has 223 Wikipedia:Disambiguation_pages_with_links and getting rid of a sizeable chunk that really want adventurer can only help.

Please take a look at the article and my reasoning, and if you still disagree, let's work something out. GRuban 16:00, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Blunted affect

Please reconsider yr vote on the Afd page. Article expanded and cleaned up. -- Naif 17:27, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting AfDs

As I was told by an administrator, please comment out relisted debates, like so. Otherwise updating WP:AFD/Old gets messed up. I already did it for the ones you relisted from Dec 13. Thanks. howcheng [ t  c  w  e ] 19:05, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

malo's RfA

Thank you!

Mo0, thanks for your support on my RFA. I was rather suprised at the overwhelming support I received. Thank you for your confidence in me. I hope that I'll live up to your expectations in the future as well. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 05:07, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bash.org AfD

No problem, I'm all about reducing the backlog on AfD. At least next time, you'll know what to do when that sort of thing crops up ;) But keep up the good work! Proto t c 09:27, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Arcipello

just checking if you read the final edit of the article 'Arcipello'. I admittedly know the artist in question but thought that he did deserve a wiki page. If you do a quick google search you will find that he is actually quite well known and thus valid as an artist and an article. I thought that my final edit cleaned up a lot of the vandalism and explained his importance somewhat.

Merry Christmas!!

SORRY!

SORRY I JUST WANTED TO SEE IF I CAN REALLY EDIT WIKIPEDIA. COOL SITE. BUT KINDA DANGEROUS IF YOU CAN ALLOW ANYBODY WITHOUTH A MEMBERSHIP TO CHANGE DATA.

RG