Jump to content

Monte Carlo method

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 193.171.32.248 (talk) at 22:10, 24 November 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Computational physics
Potentials
Fluid dynamics
Monte Carlo methods
Particle
Scientists

Monte Carlo methods are a class of computational algorithms that rely on repeated random sampling to compute their results. Monte Carlo methods are often used when simulating physical and mathematical systems. Because of their reliance on repeated computation of random or pseudo-random numbers, Monte Carlo methods are most suited to calculation by a computer. Monte Carlo methods tend to be used when it is infeasible or impossible to compute an exact result with a deterministic algorithm.[1]

Monte Carlo simulation methods are especially useful in studying systems with a large number of coupled degrees of freedom, such as fluids, disordered materials, strongly coupled solids, and cellular structures (see cellular Potts model). More broadly, Monte Carlo methods are useful for modeling phenomena with significant uncertainty in inputs, such as the calculation of risk in business. These methods are also widely used in mathematics: a classic use is for the evaluation of definite integrals, particularly multidimensional integrals with complicated boundary conditions. It is a widely successful method in risk analysis when compared with alternative methods or human intuition. When Monte Carlo simulations have been applied in space exploration and oil exploration, actual observations of failures, cost overruns and schedule overruns are routinely better predicted by the simulations than by human intuition or alternative "soft" methods.[2]

The term "Monte Carlo method" was coined in the 1940s by physicists working on nuclear weapon projects in the Los Alamos National Laboratory.[3]

Overview

The Monte Carlo method can be illustrated as a game of Battleship. First a player makes some random shots. Next the player applies algorithms (i.e. a battleship is four dots in the vertical or horizontal direction). Finally based on the outcome of the random sampling and the algorithm the player can determine the likely locations of the other player's ships.

There is no single Monte Carlo method; instead, the term describes a large and widely-used class of approaches. However, these approaches tend to follow a particular pattern:

  1. Define a domain of possible inputs.
  2. Generate inputs randomly from the domain using a certain specified probability distribution.
  3. Perform a deterministic computation using the inputs.
  4. Aggregate the results of the individual computations into the final result.

For example, the value of π can be approximated using a Monte Carlo method:

  1. Draw a square on the ground, then inscribe a circle within it. From plane geometry, the ratio of the area of an inscribed circle to that of the surrounding square is π/4.
  2. Uniformly scatter some objects of uniform size throughout the square. For example, grains of rice or sand.
  3. Since the two areas are in the ratio π/4, the objects should fall in the areas in approximately the same ratio. Thus, counting the number of objects in the circle and dividing by the total number of objects in the square will yield an approximation for π/4. Multiplying the result by 4 will then yield an approximation for π itself.

Notice how the π approximation follows the general pattern of Monte Carlo algorithms. First, we define a domain of inputs: in this case, it's the square which circumscribes our circle. Next, we generate inputs randomly (scatter individual grains within the square), then perform a computation on each input (test whether it falls within the circle). At the end, we aggregate the results into our final result, the approximation of π. Note, also, two other common properties of Monte Carlo methods: the computation's reliance on good random numbers, and its slow convergence to a better approximation as more data points are sampled. If grains are purposefully dropped into only, for example, the center of the circle, they will not be uniformly distributed, and so our approximation will be poor. An approximation will also be poor if only a few grains are randomly dropped into the whole square. Thus, the approximation of π will become more accurate both as the grains are dropped more uniformly and as more are dropped.

History

Fermi in the 30's and Stanislaw Ulam in 1946 got that idea. Stanislaw Ulam later contacted John Von Neumann to work on this. See http://people.cs.ubc.ca/~nando/papers/mlintro.pdf

Physicists at Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory were investigating radiation shielding and the distance that neutrons would likely travel through various materials. Despite having most of the necessary data, such as the average distance a neutron would travel in a substance before it collided with an atomic nucleus or how much energy the neutron was likely to give off following a collision, the problem could not be solved with theoretical calculations. John von Neumann and Stanislaw Ulam suggested that the problem be solved by modeling the experiment on a computer using chance. Being secret, their work required a code name. Von Neumann chose the name "Monte Carlo". The name is a reference to the Monte Carlo Casino in Monaco where Ulam's uncle would borrow money to gamble.[4][5][6]

Random methods of computation and experimentation (generally considered forms of stochastic simulation) can be arguably traced back to the earliest pioneers of probability theory (see, e.g., Buffon's needle, and the work on small samples by William Sealy Gosset), but are more specifically traced to the pre-electronic computing era. The general difference usually described about a Monte Carlo form of simulation is that it systematically "inverts" the typical mode of simulation, treating deterministic problems by first finding a probabilistic analog (see Simulated annealing). Previous methods of simulation and statistical sampling generally did the opposite: using simulation to test a previously understood deterministic problem. Though examples of an "inverted" approach do exist historically, they were not considered a general method until the popularity of the Monte Carlo method spread.

Monte Carlo methods were central to the simulations required for the Manhattan Project, though were severely limited by the computational tools at the time. Therefore, it was only after electronic computers were first built (from 1945 on) that Monte Carlo methods began to be studied in depth. In the 1950s they were used at Los Alamos for early work relating to the development of the hydrogen bomb, and became popularized in the fields of physics, physical chemistry, and operations research. The Rand Corporation and the U.S. Air Force were two of the major organizations responsible for funding and disseminating information on Monte Carlo methods during this time, and they began to find a wide application in many different fields.

Uses of Monte Carlo methods require large amounts of random numbers, and it was their use that spurred the development of pseudorandom number generators, which were far quicker to use than the tables of random numbers which had been previously used for statistical sampling.

Applications

As mentioned, Monte Carlo simulation methods are especially useful for modeling phenomena with significant uncertainty in inputs and in studying systems with a large number of coupled degrees of freedom. Specific areas of application include:

Physical sciences

Monte Carlo methods are very important in computational physics, physical chemistry, and related applied fields, and have diverse applications from complicated quantum chromodynamics calculations to designing heat shields and aerodynamic forms. The Monte Carlo method is widely used in statistical physics, particularly Monte Carlo molecular modeling as an alternative for computational molecular dynamics as well as to compute statistical field theories of simple particle and polymer models [7]; see Monte Carlo method in statistical physics. In experimental particle physics, these methods are used for designing detectors, understanding their behavior and comparing experimental data to theory, or on vastly large scale of the galaxy modelling.[8]

Monte Carlo methods are also used in the ensemble models that form the basis of modern weather forecasting operations.

Design and visuals

Monte Carlo methods have also proven efficient in solving coupled integral differential equations of radiation fields and energy transport, and thus these methods have been used in global illumination computations which produce photorealistic images of virtual 3D models, with applications in video games, architecture, design, computer generated films, special effects in cinema.

Finance and business

Monte Carlo methods in finance are often used to calculate the value of companies, to evaluate investments in projects at a business unit or corporate level, or to evaluate financial derivatives. Monte Carlo methods used in these cases allow the construction of stochastic or probabilistic financial models as opposed to the traditional static and deterministic models, thereby enhancing the treatment of uncertainty in the calculation. For use in the insurance industry, see stochastic modelling.

Telecommunications

When planning a wireless network, design must be proved to work for a wide variety of scenarios that depend mainly on the number of users, their locations and the services they want to use. Monte Carlo methods are typically used to generate these users and their states. The network performance is then evaluated and, if results are not satisfactory, the network design goes through an optimization process.

Games

Monte Carlo methods have recently been applied in game playing related artificial intelligence theory. Most notably the game of Go has seen remarkably successful Monte Carlo algorithm based computer players. One of the main problems that this approach has in game playing is that it sometimes misses an isolated, very good move. These approaches are often strong strategically but weak tactically, as tactical decisions tend to rely on a small number of crucial moves which are easily missed by the randomly searching Monte Carlo algorithm.

Monte Carlo simulation versus “what if” scenarios

The opposite of Monte Carlo simulation might be considered deterministic modeling using single-point estimates. Each uncertain variable within a model is assigned a “best guess” estimate. Various combinations of each input variable are manually chosen (such as best case, worst case, and most likely case), and the results recorded for each so-called “what if” scenario. [9]

By contrast, Monte Carlo simulation considers random sampling of probability distribution functions as model inputs to produce hundreds or thousands of possible outcomes instead of a few discrete scenarios. The results provide probabilities of different outcomes occurring. [10]

For example, a comparison of a spreadsheet cost construction model run using traditional “what if” scenarios, and then run again with Monte Carlo simulation and Triangular probability distributions shows that the Monte Carlo analysis has a narrower range than the “what if” analysis. This is because the “what if” analysis gives equal weight to all scenarios.[11]

For further discussion, see quantifying uncertainty under corporate finance.

Use in mathematics

In general, Monte Carlo methods are used in mathematics to solve various problems by generating suitable random numbers and observing that fraction of the numbers which obeys some property or properties. The method is useful for obtaining numerical solutions to problems which are too complicated to solve analytically. The most common application of the Monte Carlo method is Monte Carlo integration.

Integration

Main article: Monte Carlo integration

Deterministic methods of numerical integration operate by taking a number of evenly spaced samples from a function. In general, this works very well for functions of one variable. However, for functions of vectors, deterministic quadrature methods can be very inefficient. To numerically integrate a function of a two-dimensional vector, equally spaced grid points over a two-dimensional surface are required. For instance a 10x10 grid requires 100 points. If the vector has 100 dimensions, the same spacing on the grid would require 10100 points—far too many to be computed. 100 dimensions is by no means unreasonable, since in many physical problems, a "dimension" is equivalent to a degree of freedom. (See Curse of dimensionality.)

Monte Carlo methods provide a way out of this exponential time-increase. As long as the function in question is reasonably well-behaved, it can be estimated by randomly selecting points in 100-dimensional space, and taking some kind of average of the function values at these points. By the law of large numbers, this method will display convergence—i.e. quadrupling the number of sampled points will halve the error, regardless of the number of dimensions.

A refinement of this method is to somehow make the points random, but more likely to come from regions of high contribution to the integral than from regions of low contribution. In other words, the points should be drawn from a distribution similar in form to the integrand. Understandably, doing this precisely is just as difficult as solving the integral in the first place, but there are approximate methods available: from simply making up an integrable function thought to be similar, to one of the adaptive routines discussed in the topics listed below.

A similar approach involves using low-discrepancy sequences instead—the quasi-Monte Carlo method. Quasi-Monte Carlo methods can often be more efficient at numerical integration because the sequence "fills" the area better in a sense and samples more of the most important points that can make the simulation converge to the desired solution more quickly.

Integration methods

Optimization

Most Monte Carlo optimization methods are based on random walks. Essentially, the program will move around a marker in multi-dimensional space, tending to move in directions which lead to a lower function, but sometimes moving against the gradient.

Another powerful and very popular application for random numbers in numerical simulation is in numerical optimization. These problems use functions of some often large-dimensional vector that are to be minimized (or maximized). Many problems can be phrased in this way: for example a computer chess program could be seen as trying to find the optimal set of, say, 10 moves which produces the best evaluation function at the end. The traveling salesman problem is another optimization problem. There are also applications to engineering design, such as multidisciplinary design optimization.

Optimization methods

Inverse problems

Probabilistic formulation of inverse problems leads to the definition of a probability distribution in the model space. This probability distribution combines a priori information with new information obtained by measuring some observable parameters (data). As, in the general case, the theory linking data with model parameters is nonlinear, the a posteriori probability in the model space may not be easy to describe (it may be multimodal, some moments may not be defined, etc.).

When analyzing an inverse problem, obtaining a maximum likelihood model is usually not sufficient, as we normally also wish to have information on the resolution power of the data. In the general case we may have a large number of model parameters, and an inspection of the marginal probability densities of interest may be impractical, or even useless. But it is possible to pseudorandomly generate a large collection of models according to the posterior probability distribution and to analyze and display the models in such a way that information on the relative likelihoods of model properties is conveyed to the spectator. This can be accomplished by means of an efficient Monte Carlo method, even in cases where no explicit formula for the a priori distribution is available.

The best-known importance sampling method, the Metropolis algorithm, can be generalized, and this gives a method that allows analysis of (possibly highly nonlinear) inverse problems with complex a priori information and data with an arbitrary noise distribution. For details, see Mosegaard and Tarantola (1995),[12] or Tarantola (2005).[13]

Computational mathematics

Main article: Monte Carlo algorithm

Monte Carlo methods are useful in many areas of computational mathematics, where a lucky choice can find the correct result. A classic example is Rabin's algorithm for primality testing: for any n which is not prime, a random x has at least a 75% chance of proving that n is not prime. Hence, if n is not prime, but x says that it might be, we have observed at most a 1-in-4 event. If 10 different random x say that "n is probably prime" when it is not, we have observed a one-in-a-million event. In general a Monte Carlo algorithm of this kind produces one correct answer with a guarantee n is composite, and x proves it so, but another one without, but with a guarantee of not getting this answer when it is wrong too often — in this case at most 25% of the time. See also Las Vegas algorithm for a related, but different, idea.

Monte Carlo and random numbers

Interestingly, Monte Carlo simulation methods do not always require truly random numbers to be useful — while for some applications, such as primality testing, unpredictability is vital (see Davenport (1995)).[14] Many of the most useful techniques use deterministic, pseudo-random sequences, making it easy to test and re-run simulations. The only quality usually necessary to make good simulations is for the pseudo-random sequence to appear "random enough" in a certain sense.

What this means depends on the application, but typically they should pass a series of statistical tests. Testing that the numbers are uniformly distributed or follow another desired distribution when a large enough number of elements of the sequence are considered is one of the simplest, and most common ones.

See also

General

Template:Statistics portal

Application areas

Other methods employing Monte Carlo

Notes

  1. ^ Douglas Hubbard "How to Measure Anything: Finding the Value of Intangibles in Business" pg. 46, John Wiley & Sons, 2007
  2. ^ Douglas Hubbard "The Failure of Risk Management: Why It's Broken and How to Fix It", John Wiley & Sons, 2009
  3. ^ Nicholas Metropolis (1987), "The beginning of the Monte Carlo method" (PDF), Los Alamos Science (1987 Special Issue dedicated to Stanislaw Ulam): 125–130
  4. ^ Douglas Hubbard "How to Measure Anything: Finding the Value of Intangibles in Business" pg. 46, John Wiley & Sons, 2007
  5. ^ Charles Grinstead & J. Laurie Snell "Introduction to Probability" pp. 10-11, American Mathematical Society, 1997
  6. ^ H.L. Anderson, "Metropolis, Monte Carlo and the MANIAC," Los Alamos Science, no. 14, pp. 96-108, 1986.
  7. ^ Stephan A. Baeurle (2009), "Multiscale modeling of polymer materials using field-theoretic methodologies: a survey about recent developments", Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, 46 (2): 363–426
  8. ^ H. T. MacGillivray, R. J. Dodd, Monte-Carlo simulations of galaxy systems, Astrophysics and Space Science, Volume 86, Number 2 / September, 1982, Springer Netherlands [1]
  9. ^ David Vose: “Risk Analysis, A Quantitative Guide,” Second Edition, p. 13, John Wiley & Sons, 2000.
  10. ^ Ibid, p. 16
  11. ^ Ibid, p. 17, showing graph
  12. ^ http://www.ipgp.jussieu.fr/~tarantola/Files/Professional/Papers_PDF/MonteCarlo_latex.pdf
  13. ^ http://www.ipgp.jussieu.fr/~tarantola/Files/Professional/SIAM/index.html
  14. ^ Davenport, J. H. "Primality testing revisited". doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/143242.143290. Retrieved 2007-08-19. {{cite web}}: Check |doi= value (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help); External link in |doi= (help)

References

  • Metropolis, N. (1949). "The Monte Carlo Method". Journal of the American Statistical Association. 44 (247): 335–341. doi:10.2307/2280232. {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |month= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Metropolis, Nicholas (1953). "Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines". Journal of Chemical Physics. 21 (6): 1087. doi:10.1063/1.1699114. {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |month= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Hammersley, J. M. (1975). Monte Carlo Methods. London: Methuen. ISBN 0416523404. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Kahneman, D. (1982). Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Gould, Harvey (1988). An Introduction to Computer Simulation Methods, Part 2, Applications to Physical Systems. Reading: Addison-Wesley. ISBN 020116504X. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Binder, Kurt (1995). The Monte Carlo Method in Condensed Matter Physics. New York: Springer. ISBN 0387543694. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  • Berg, Bernd A. (2004). Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulations and Their Statistical Analysis (With Web-Based Fortran Code). Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific. ISBN 9812389350. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  • Caflisch, R. E. (1998). Monte Carlo and quasi-Monte Carlo methods. Acta Numerica. Vol. 7. Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–49. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  • Doucet, Arnaud (2001). Sequential Monte Carlo methods in practice. New York: Springer. ISBN 0387951466. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Fishman, G. S. (1995). Monte Carlo: Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications. New York: Springer. ISBN 038794527X. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  • MacKeown, P. Kevin (1997). Stochastic Simulation in Physics. New York: Springer. ISBN 9813083263. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  • Robert, C. P. (2004). Monte Carlo Statistical Methods (2nd ed.). New York: Springer. ISBN 0387212396. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Rubinstein, R. Y. (2007). Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 9780470177938. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Mosegaard, Klaus (1995). "Monte Carlo sampling of solutions to inverse problems". J. Geophys. Res. 100 (B7): 12431–12447. doi:10.1029/94JB03097. {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |month= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Tarantola, Albert (2005). Inverse Problem Theory. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. ISBN 0898715725. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)

Software

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Monte_Carlo_method&oldid=327746370"