Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waterloo Road characters

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Harleyamber (talk | contribs) at 23:02, 26 November 2009 (Waterloo Road characters). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Waterloo Road characters

(View log)

Articles nominated - listed here.

  • Delete. Sorry for the en-masse nomination, but these are the character pages that have no out-of-universe notability and just excessive plot summary. All relevant information is already at List of characters in Waterloo Road or List of minor & recurring Waterloo Road characters. GaGaOohLaLa (talk) 21:19, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all I have been keeping an eye on these articles for months and made the main editors aware of the need to provide real-world context and establish notability using independent sources. There has been absolutely no attempt to do this. Vitally, there is no evidence that it ever will be done as there is insufficient coverage. It is not that these are bad articles, it is that they never can become good ones because there isn't the material out there. The JPStalk to me 21:35, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all This appears to be a large collection of original research based on interpretation of primary sources. If any of these characters has achieved significant real world coverage by independent reliable sources then that may be the basis of an encyclopedic article, but this is just something fans wrote based on their own personal knowledge and primary sources. If I am wrong, then please correct me by providing citations and preferably putting them into the articles. Chillum 21:56, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all - WP:OR. Crafty (talk) 22:07, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect them all to List of characters in Waterloo Road. As much as I disagree with The JPS about nothing being done to change them, ( I myself have tried before but within hours [sometimes minutes] they have been re-edited again) im sick to death of them, and it can be such a hardship even reverting the endless vandalism to them. let alone trying to get them in proper order. So just redirect them to that page, and have it done with. As the OP has said, all relevant information is already on there Harleyamber (talk) 22:56, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]