Jump to content

Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/UltraBot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Anomie (talk | contribs) at 03:07, 2 December 2009 (Discussion: progress?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Operator: Junaidpv

Automatic or Manually assisted: Automatic

Programming language(s): Python

Source code available: standard pywikipedia framework

Function overview: interwiki purpose

Edit period(s): few edits per day

Estimated number of pages affected:

Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Not yet

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): No

Function details: Just interwiki only

Discussion

Is this running on any other wikis? If so, ENWP allows Global Bots for interwiki-only work and does not require seperate approval. Q T C 07:43, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Currently, this bot doesn't have a global flag. --Erwin (talk) 08:39, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
that is what I have tried before, but because of this bot only started few weeks ago, they rejected the request :( --UltraBot (talk) 09:41, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Side note: You should be editing as you, not the bot. Q T C 12:17, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ok --Junaid (talk) 07:31, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You might look at resolving Monoicous/Monoecious. I sorted it out some months back but it seems other wikis keep re-adding bad links. Rich Farmbrough, 09:59, 6 September 2009 (UTC).[reply]
Well I went to see what had happened and fixed it. But it would be good if we could keep it fixed without using {{nobots}} on the article, because all the other wiki';s have incorrect links (when it goes wrong). Rich Farmbrough, 10:36, 6 September 2009 (UTC).[reply]
Do you need a bot flag if it's a few edits a day? Rich Farmbrough, 10:37, 6 September 2009 (UTC).[reply]
few edits means up to what number? here i am going to do with interwiki only. some day it may do more edits, but most of time it will do few edits only --195.229.235.38 (talk) 09:28, 12 September 2009 (UTC) really sorry for not being logged in while leaving last comment, just now only I noticed it :( --Junaid (talk) 06:50, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Mr.Z-man 00:40, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A user has requested the attention of the operator. Once the operator has seen this message and replied, please deactivate this tag. Any progress? Anomie 03:07, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]