User talk:TheStrayCat

Fuck off! LällällälläKD (talk) 10:07, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Ukraine

Привіт! I noticed you are interested in Ukraine-related themes, so you may want to check out the Ukraine Portal , particularly the Portal:Ukraine/New article announcements and Portal:Ukraine/Ukraine-related Wikipedia notice board. The New article announcements board is probably the most important and the most attended one. Please don't forget to announce there the new articles you create. Adding both boards to your watchlist is probably a good idea. You can also join WikiProject Ukraine, a tool to help perfect the Ukrainian related articles on the English Wikipedia. We would be glad to have you as a member of WikiProject Ukraine!

— Mariah-Yulia • Talk to me! 20:50, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Дякую! =) Thanks for the proposal, I'll consider it, but unfortunately I currently don't have much leisure time to participate in the project fully. --//Microcell// 13:52, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mathsmithing

I replaced the {{db-empty}} speedy deletion tag with a prod describing the article as WP:MADEUP. this article inst eligible for deletion under section A3 because it does have some content, despite how inappropriate the content is.--RadioFan (talk) 19:11, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thanks, I just thought that since this term was coined two days ago, most likely it's an original research. If anyone finds any reliable sources on it, it will be great, but I don't see such ones.--Microcell (talk) 19:31, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, doesn't it fit CSD A7?--Microcell (talk) 19:35, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Muni Hitruchi Vijay

Hello Microcell, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Muni Hitruchi Vijay - a page you tagged - because: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. Ϣere SpielChequers 15:23, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of link on regenerative thermal oxidizer

Hello Microcell.

I added a link to Environmental Expert because it is the number 1 portal for air pollution control and as such much more relevant than the other link, Process Register. Nearly all RTO suppliers in the world are registered on Environmental Expert. I feel that a list of suppliers of RTOs is an important information for the user and not just a commercial link. Otherwise, why don't you delete the link to Process Register as well? Airpollutioncontrol (talk) 16:29, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I've recovered the link, to tell the truth, I'm not an expert in this area. Mostly your edits seemed to be test (e.g. dewikification, hopefully you already understand this), so I reverted them "automatically", sorry for assuming bad faith. If you need to define whether the link is appropriate, I'd rather you familiarized yourself with WP:EL or asked more experienced users than me. --Microcell (talk) 17:48, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Samuel Lodato

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Samuel Lodato. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Lodato. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Manufacturing Dissent

I don't know what you're talking about, concerning the Manufacturing Dissent article. It was a pretty straightforward point of information, referenced. Check out the reference, watch the film [Manufacturing Dissent] if you like. It's acknowledged by most that scene was staged, interesting to note the article undone almost as soon as it was revised. More Wikipedia censorship, inconvenient truth flushed down the Wikipedia Memory Hole. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.97.9.194 (talk) 18:16, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The fact is that not all cited content is suitable for Wikipedia; your addition, for instance, violated WP:COPYVIO exactly towards the site mentioned by you. As well it's inappropriate because of WP:PLOT and WP:FILMPLOT, please, get to know these guidelines.--Microcell (talk) 18:30, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your rollback request

Hello Microcell, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam/blatantly unconstructive edits, and that using it to revert anything else (by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with) can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning, depending on the admin who becomes aware of any misuse. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 18:55, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!--Microcell (talk) 19:03, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]