Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Joseph (Geoshrad)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RenamedUser jaskldjslak903 (talk | contribs) at 01:38, 9 December 2009 (close discussion: delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:38, 9 December 2009 by RenamedUser jaskldjslak903 (talk | contribs) (close discussion: delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 01:38, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- George Joseph (Geoshrad) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
the reference for "award winning" is the guy's own website Polarpanda (talk) 14:03, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, can see nothing notable. Even if "award winning" is true it surely should matter what type of award that is, and who else has noticed it. Also COI. Please, Polarpanda, use a tool to populate AfD. This way the AfD day log stays intact ;) --Pgallert (talk) 14:39, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Is it just me, or doesn't the link actually show he's award-winning. I wasn't able to find the evidence, even on his own site. - Mgm|(talk) 10:50, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Insufficient evidence of notability.--JohnnyB256 (talk) 17:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:55, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Wait Data is being Added up —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.144.134.242 (talk) 15:20, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Very well but these are not reliable sources (except NatGeo), and coverage is from Geoshrad, not about him. If National Geographic brings an article on Geoshrad, that would change things for me. --Pgallert (talk) 09:05, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.