Wikipedia:Featured article review/Anabolic steroid/archive1
Appearance
Toolbox |
---|
- Notified: Example user, ... Example WikiProject, ...
I am nominating this featured article for review because if is not that well organized, some of it is confusing, and it is still limited in scope.
- Does not discuss trend in usage.
- Starts by says they are "a class of steroid hormones" yet on the steroid hormones page are not listed as one of the five classes
- "related to the hormone testosterone" does that include testosterone? And a couple others should be listed in the lead
- "stimulate bone growth" is mentioned in the lead however this is no longer done due to growth hormone and the article should reflect this
- medical uses section is a list. Should be presented as prose. Some uses are unreferenced. How effective for all these indications should be mentioned. A number of conditions are historical, some are in research stages, and others listed were found to be not effective.
- Mechanism of action and Pharmacodynamics are listed under side effects?
- Improvement tags are presentDoc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:32, 11 December 2009 (UTC)