User talk:The Arbiter
offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Home |
Talk |
USERBOXES! |
To-do |
My Awards |
Guestbook |
My Contribs |
|
| ||||||
 | This user is a member of WikiProject Userboxes. This WikiProject aims to organize, expand and improve all Wikipedia's userboxes. We want to make it easy for users to make their own, and to find others, as well as create a standard for all userboxes, including naming conventions and content standards. |
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
| vn-1 | This user talk page has been vandalized 1 time. |
Re: Morgan Newton
He might be notable, not sure. It was deleted due to it being a copyright violation, so the question of notability wasn't brought up. Wizardman 01:36, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, the page I deleted was copied word for word from the kentucky team site. Wizardman 17:29, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
- That would be a question to ask the people at Wikipedia:Bot Approvals Group. I don't know enough about bots to know if they'd approve it, though I think they'd be fine with it imo. Wizardman 17:51, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Help
{{Helpme}}
I am interested in beginning to develop a bot. Is there a page that shows the current active bots and a brief summary of their functions? I just want to make sure that I don't make a redundant bot, if you get my meaning. The Arbiter★★★ 22:31, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
ADoptee
no hard feelings. some things have gotten in the way and i thought it was best to find another one. someone accuses me of targetting him and is using you as an excuse even though i have not mentioned his name.
so i thought it's best if i found another adoptee so this user wont accuse me of ganging up on him.Bread Ninja (talk) 15:40, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- As I'm the one Bread Ninja is talking about, I'd like to clarify a few things. Being one of the participants in the debate which ended in a consensus against one of Bread Ninja's proposition, I was not too pleased to see that Bread Ninja was using your talk page, The Arbiter, to spread behind our backs her own, very subjective account of the debate, in which we would all have been "uncivil".
- I didn't say anything until I saw Bread Ninja attempting to spread the false claim, on another participant's talk page, that I would have been "uncivil", to the point that she planned to report me, that I had a "problem" that needed "fixing".
- I can perfectly understand Bread Ninja's hatred for our inital disagreement with her concerning article content, what I do not accept is her "behind the backs" attempts, since the discussion ended, to rewrite history and to put us all in the roles of the bad guys, and to jump on every single occasion to accuse us of something, or even to sets us against each other. I ended up being accused of "uncivility", even though Bread Ninja herself doesn't seem to have any problem to call us all a "bunch of biased fans". I just told her that this behavior, libelling us while trying to make people unfamiliar with the topic take sides even after the discussion was ended (and that's when I mentionned your own talk page, Arbiter) wouldn't get her anywhere.Folken de Fanel (talk) 21:31, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Merry Christmas back at you :)
I hope that this Christmas season is one of celebration and rest for you and your family. fetchcomms☛ 00:42, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Also, if you don't mind, I've fixed your template to provide the date along with your signature (as you were substing it). Feel free to change it back if it causes issues though :) fetchcomms☛ 00:42, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, sorry... Just thought you'd like a date like with normal signing. Oh well. fetchcomms☛ 00:45, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the barnstar! fetchcomms☛ 00:57, 15 December 2009 (UTC)