Talk:Treaty of Axim
Treaty of Axim was nominated as a History good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (June 19, 2008). There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
Treaty of Axim received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
A fact from Treaty of Axim appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 May 2008, and was viewed approximately 460 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA review
When reading through the article I have identified the following points which I believe need to be adressed before the article is promoted to GA status.
- Expand the article to allow it to be more broad in its coverage.
- Add more references to verify all points of the article
- Find citations for places where [citation needed] is shown.
I haven't finished looking through the article so i may add more.
If you think I am being unreasonable please tell me. Anonymous101 (talk) 20:25, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Failed GAN as it has been on hold for a while (several weeks) and the issues have not been addressed. Anonymous101 (talk) 14:55, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Reversed changes
Last changes made to the article reversed, as these were making broad historical claims regarding the nature of the state and kingship which were not properly underpinned by references. Reference to Barbot was incomplete and possibly incorrect. Moreover, edits were made by anonymous editor.
Suggestion is to thrash out the issues first in the discussion section of the Axim article, where the same type of changes were made, and only then copy relevant parts to this article Michel Doortmont (talk) 23:55, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
- Former good article nominees
- Old requests for peer review
- Start-Class history articles
- Mid-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles
- Start-Class Africa articles
- Mid-importance Africa articles
- Start-Class Ghana articles
- Unknown-importance Ghana articles
- WikiProject Ghana articles
- WikiProject Africa articles
- Start-Class Netherlands articles
- All WikiProject Netherlands pages
- WikiProject templates with unknown parameters
- Start-Class International relations articles
- Mid-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles
- Start-Class law articles
- Mid-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class African military history articles
- African military history task force articles
- Start-Class Dutch military history articles
- Dutch military history task force articles
- Start-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles