Talk:Muhammad/images
Important notice:
This page is solely for constructive discussion of how best to integrate images in the Muhammad page, within Wikipedia talkpage guidelines.
A summary of the current consensus regarding pictures of Muhammad can be found at Talk:Muhammad/FAQ. If you personally want to avoid seeing the images, you might want to read How to set your browser to not see images. Suggestions are expected to be informed by Wikipedia guidelines, in particular Wikipedia:No disclaimers in articles. Suggestions for an adaptation of standing guidelines are offtopic on this page and belong on Wikipedia talk:No disclaimers in articles or Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Because of disruption and trolling, the Muhammad page can be edited only by established Wikipedia users. Please be polite and calm. Trolling or aggressive rhetoric either for or against the use of images will not be tolerated. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Please Remove Photos depicting Prophet
Please remove the photo depicting Prophet Muhammad , its forbidden in Islam
Allah Hafiz —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.65.201 (talk) 19:42, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not bound by any religion's laws, neither Islamic, Christian, Hindu, Jewish or other.Jeppiz (talk) 20:27, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Is providing non-real images ensures a quality article?
Wikipedia is a great resource of knowledge but because it is a public property, it is difficult to see whether quality is maintained or not. I was reading the discussion about images of Muhammad and the controversy. I understand the neutral point of view Wikipedia supports but i must say that providing non-real pictures of people doesn't ensure a quality article. What is the usage of self-made picture of Muhammad in Kaaba or preaching? Is there any equal logical explanation for that? There is a lot more quality literature about Muhammad in the whole world but that doesn't mean we infest every bit of information. Providing non-real images is not information (concrete information) at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matrixology (talk • contribs) 13:52, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Have you read the FAQ, especially Q3? --NeilN talk to me 13:59, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Remove the Pictures
Being Neutral does not mean that you should heart feelings of more than billion people. See these pictures are just useless you can post other pictures that will be more suitable. It is very sensitive issue Muslims hate these pictures and if you dont remove certainly they will hate your site also. And i dont think that removing these pictures will in anyway violate your policies. And it is not that hiding these pictures in our browser will do any good.
- Please read Talk:Muhammad/FAQ. Your arguments have already been addressed there. But I will add:
- The pictures are already suitable for the article, as they are historically significant works of art by Muslims who evidently had no problem with images of the prophet.
- Read the Qu'ran. It doesn't prohibit such images.
- Many people hate many things on Wikipedia. Wikipedia isn't censored for anyone's benefit.
- Removing the images will violate the core policy of having encyclopedic articles in an encyclopedia.
- If you don't want to see the pictures, don't look at them. You have instructions on how to hide them, so use those instructions. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:01, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Remove the pictures of Muhammed now
you had better remove pictures of muhammed because they offensive to every muslim worldwide and if muslim is to come across this page it causes outrage and disgust. Allah can and will punish anyone who support pictures of our holy prophet —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.211.219.221 (talk) 00:28, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Please read the FAQ; you may hide the pictures by creating an account and following these instructions: Wikipedia:How_to_set_your_browser_to_not_see_images#Specific_pages --NeilN talk to me 00:52, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
What are you going to do if we don't? Blow urself up? User:imalegend
- No thanks. We like the pictures where they are. Resolute 01:00, 8 December 2009 (UTC)