User talk:Jayjg/Archive 38
This is a subpage of Jayjg's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Thanks for visiting my Talk: page.
If you are considering posting something to me, please: *Post new messages to the bottom of my talk page.
Comments which fail to follow the four rules above may be immediately archived or deleted. Thanks again for visiting. |
no archives yet (create) |
This page has archives. Sections older than 6 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Why was UPWA deleted?
I was wondering why the UPWA page was deleted. It is notable on the East Coast and I dont think a few complainers should control what is put up. DonnieB657701 (talk) 04:21, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- It was deleted because of this discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UPWA Pro Wrestling Jayjg (talk) 00:51, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
- So four people control all of wikipedia?? What is this Communist Russia?DonnieB657701 (talk) 22:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.2.104.99 (talk)
- Five people discussed the article, and agreed that it didn't meet Wikipedia's standards for article topics, specifically Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). Jayjg (talk) 03:42, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thats so adult. You state your piece and then block me? Also how does the UPWA page get deleted but a no name school called June Buchanan school is approved and kept because a moderator created it. More people know the UPWA then they do that school. The UPWA page should be reinstated and catorgized in the Wikiproject North Carolina section. DonnieB657701 (talk) 22:30, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, I didn't block that last account, someone else did. But I've blocked this one. Jayjg (talk) 23:22, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thats so adult. You state your piece and then block me? Also how does the UPWA page get deleted but a no name school called June Buchanan school is approved and kept because a moderator created it. More people know the UPWA then they do that school. The UPWA page should be reinstated and catorgized in the Wikiproject North Carolina section. DonnieB657701 (talk) 22:30, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
- Five people discussed the article, and agreed that it didn't meet Wikipedia's standards for article topics, specifically Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). Jayjg (talk) 03:42, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
- So four people control all of wikipedia?? What is this Communist Russia?DonnieB657701 (talk) 22:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.2.104.99 (talk)
requested amendment of WB/JS arbitration case
I have filed a request to amend the West Bank - Judea and Samaria arbitration case. See here. nableezy - 20:48, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I wonder if you could help me with this. An anonymous IP user made a ton of small edits to this page. Some edits are good, but most are unreferenced and a few are plain wrong. Since there's no one to talk to about these edits, should I just rollback everything and wait to hear from someone? I'm asking you what to do since I really don't relish the idea of combing through all these edits to pick out the good ones. Thank you, Yoninah (talk) 23:16, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the advice. Yoninah (talk) 13:18, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
AfD
I've nominated List of former Jews, List of former Christians, and List of former Muslims together for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of former Jews.Kitfoxxe (talk) 15:54, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
Happy New Year
DYK for Temple Israel (Columbus, Ohio)
Materialscientist (talk) 18:00, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
ANAT technology page
Please userify the deleted ANAT technology page. I will make more sources and have others do so as well, then itll be back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Canadiansteve (talk • contribs) 07:40, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- I've userfied it at User:Canadiansteve/ANAT technology. Jayjg (talk) 07:52, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Canadiansteve (talk • contribs) 07:54, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Chabad 12 year old user
Hi Jay: Something to be concerned about: Please take a look at this User:Hayesgenius, a twelve year old Chabad-Lubavitch child editor on Wikipedia, in his edit history [1] he leaves information about who he is and what he's doing in violation of WP:NOTMYSPACE aka WP:NOTFACEBOOKfor a start. Looks like a troubling development. In your professional opinion and as a Wikipedian do you think it's safe and correct and SANE for kids to get involved like this, even post their personal pics? Will Chabad now send even 12 year olds to the Wikipedia "front lines" because many of them are online so much? This needs some guidance and guidelines. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism#Chabad 12 year old user for a discussion, or feel free to blank the kid's page and block him. Thanks a lot, IZAK (talk) 11:54, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Still up, why?
Just took a look at the page again User:Hayesgenius and it's still up. His pics are now deleted, but why are some editors helping this 11 or 12 year old child still keep an account here? IZAK (talk) 04:38, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- IZAK, Wikipedia has no rule prohibiting 12-year-olds from registering and setting up User pages. If you're concerned for his safety, why don't you send him an e-mail message? If you think his User page should be deleted, why don't you bring it to MfD? His personal information has been deleted. Please call off the hounds. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 05:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Hi IZAK, as Malik said, Wikipedia has no rule against 12-year-olds setting up accounts here, so I don't think there's much else that can be done. He doesn't appear to have edited in two months, so perhaps this isn't a pressing issue. Jayjg (talk) 18:40, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- I was worried for a second, I thought I would be banned.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 18:49, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Don't tempt me. ;-) Jayjg (talk) 18:51, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- The way you act at times leads to some suspicions about your age as well, so its best that you not get involved in this discussion.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 18:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- I'd respond, but my mom is yelling at me that I have to take out the garbage now. Jayjg (talk) 18:58, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- The way you act at times leads to some suspicions about your age as well, so its best that you not get involved in this discussion.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 18:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Don't tempt me. ;-) Jayjg (talk) 18:51, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- I was worried for a second, I thought I would be banned.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 18:49, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Ophélie Bretnacher
Hello, You delated the page too fast. I didn't have the time to answer. it was the translation of the new french page, which has been kept, after the discussion. Maybe you will have the time too reed this new page, which is an important european problem It has been improved by the french wikipedians. Maybe it can alsobe improved by english wikipedians.