Jump to content

Learning theory (education)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 94.230.82.161 (talk) at 20:46, 9 January 2010 ( indeed Daniel Greenberg is a staff member at Sudbury Valley School). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In psychology and education, a common definition of learning is a process that brings together cognitive, emotional, and environmental influences and experiences for acquiring, enhancing, or making changes in one's knowledge, skills, values, and world views (Illeris,2000; Ormorod, 1995). Learning as a process focuses on what happens when the learning takes place. Explanations of what happens constitute learning theories. A learning theory is an attempt to describe how people and animals learn, thereby helping us understand the inherently complex process of learning. Learning theories have two chief values according to Hill (2002). One is in providing us with vocabulary and a conceptual framework for interpreting the examples of learning that we observe. The other is in suggesting where to look for solutions to practical problems. The theories do not give us solutions, but they do direct our attention to those variables that are crucial in finding solutions.

There are three main categories or philosophical frameworks under which learning theories fall: behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism. Behaviorism focuses only on the objectively observable aspects of learning. Cognitive theories look beyond behavior to explain brain-based learning. And constructivism views learning as a process in which the learner actively constructs or builds new ideas or concepts.

Behaviorism

Behavorism as a theory was most developed by B. F. Skinner. It loosely includes the work of such people as Thorndike, Tolman, Guthrie, and Hull. What characterizes these investigators is their underlying assumptions about the process of learning. In essence, three basic assumptions are held to be true. First, learning is manifested by a change in behavior. Second, the environment shapes behavior. And third, the principles of contiguity (how close in time, two events must be for a bond to be formed ) and reinforcement (any means of increasing the likelihood that an event will be repeated ) are central to explaining the learning process. For behaviorism, learning is the acquisition of new behavior through conditioning.

There are two types of possible conditioning:

1) Classical conditioning, where the behavior becomes a reflex response to stimulus as in the case of Pavlov's Dogs. Pavlov was interested in studying reflexes, when he saw that the dogs drooled without the proper stimulus. Although no food was in sight, their saliva still dribbled. It turned out that the dogs were reacting to lab coats. Every time the dogs were served food, the person who served the food was wearing a lab coat. Therefore, the dogs reacted as if food was on its way whenever they saw a lab coat.In a series of experiments, Pavlov then tried to figure out how these phenomena were linked. For example, he struck a bell when the dogs were fed. If the bell was sounded in close association with their meal, the dogs learned to associate the sound of the bell with food. After a while, at the mere sound of the bell, they responded by drooling.

2) Operant conditioning where there is reinforcement of the behavior by a reward or a punishment. The theory of operant conditioning was developed by B.F. Skinner and is known as Radical Behaviorism. The word ‘operant’ refers to the way in which behavior ‘operates on the environment’. Briefly, a behavior may result either in reinforcement, which increases the likelihood of the behavior recurring, or punishment, which decreases the likelihood of the behavior recurring. It is important to note that, a punishment is not considered to be applicable if it does not result in the reduction of the behavior, and so the terms punishment and reinforcement are determined as a result of the actions. Within this framework, behaviorists are particularly interested in measurable changes in behavior.

Educational approaches such as applied behavior analysis, curriculum based measurement, and direct instruction have emerged from this model.[citation needed]

Cognitivism

The earliest challenge to the behaviorists came in a publication in 1929 by Bode, a gestalt psychologist. He criticized behaviorists for being too dependent on overt behavior to explain learning. Gestalt psychologists proposed looking at the patterns rather than isolated events. Gestalt views of learning have been incorporated into what have come to be labeled cognitive theories. Two key assumptions underlie this cognitive approach: (1) that the memory system is an active organized processor of information and (2) that prior knowledge plays an important role in learning. Cognitive theories look beyond behavior to explain brain-based learning. Cognitivists consider how human memory works to promote learning. For example, the physiological processes of sorting and encoding information and events into short term memory and long term memory are important to educators working under the cognitive theory. The major difference between gestaltists and behaviorists is the locus of control over the learning activity . For gestaltists, it lies with the individual learner; for behaviorists, it lies with the environment.

Once memory theories like the Atkinson-Shiffrin memory model and Baddeley's working memory model were established as a theoretical framework in cognitive psychology, new cognitive frameworks of learning began to emerge during the 1970s, 80s, and 90s. Today, researchers are concentrating on topics like cognitive load and information processing theory. These theories of learning are very useful as they guide instructional design.[citation needed]. Aspects of cognitivism can be found in learning how to learn, social role acquisition, intelligence, learning, and memory as related to age.

Constructivism

Constructivism views learning as a process in which the learner actively constructs or builds new ideas or concepts based upon current and past knowledge or experience. In other words, "learning involves constructing one's own knowledge from one's own experiences." Constructivist learning, therefore, is a very personal endeavor, whereby internalized concepts, rules, and general principles may consequently be applied in a practical real-world context. This is also known as social constructivism (see social constructivism). Social constructivists posit that knowledge is constructed when individuals engage socially in talk and activity about shared problems or tasks. Learning is seen as the process by which individuals are introduced to a culture by more skilled members"(Driver et al., 1994) Constructivism itself has many variations, such as Active learning, discovery learning, and knowledge building. Regardless of the variety, constructivism promotes a student's free exploration within a given framework or structure.[citation needed]The teacher acts as a facilitator who encourages students to discover principles for themselves and to construct knowledge by working to solve realistic problems. Aspects of constructivism can be found in self-directed learning, transformational learning, experiential learning, situated cognition, and reflective practice.

Informal and post-modern theories

Informal theories of education may attempt to break down the learning process in pursuit of practicality[citation needed]. One of these deals with whether learning should take place as a building of concepts toward an overall idea, or the understanding of the overall idea with the details filled in later. Critics[citation needed] believe that trying to teach an overall idea without details (facts) is like trying to build a masonry structure without bricks.

Other concerns are the origins of the drive for learning [citation needed]. Some argue that learning is primarily self-regulated, and that the ideal learning situation is one dissimilar to the modern classroom [citation needed]. Critics argue that students learning in isolation fail [citation needed].

Other learning theories

Other learning theories have also been developed for more specific purposes than general learning theories. For example, andragogy is the art and science to help adults learn.

Connectivism is a recent theory of networked learning which focuses on learning as making connections

Multimedia learning theory focuses on principles for the effective use of multimedia in learning.

The Sudbury Model and criticism of the concept of teaching in traditional education

The Sudbury Model learning theory adduces that learning is a process you do, not a process that is done to you. This theory states that there are many ways to learn without the intervention of a teacher being imperative.[1][2][3][4]

Traditional education focuses on teaching, not learning. It incorrectly assumes that for every ounce of teaching there is an ounce of learning by those who are taught. However, most of what we learn before, during, and after attending schools is learned without it being taught to us. A child learns such fundamental things as how to walk, talk, eat, dress, and so on without being taught these things. Adults learn most of what they use at work or at leisure while at work or leisure. Most of what is taught in classroom settings is forgotten, and much or what is remembered is irrelevant.[5][6]

— "The Objective of Education Is Learning, Not Teaching," Turning Learning Right Side Up: Putting Education Back on Track.

This model of education learning theory holds the basic assumption that children are naturally curious and do not need to be forced to learn.[7]

Other interests

Every well-constructed theory of education has at its center a philosophical anthropology.[8]

See also

About accelerating the learning process
About the mechanisms of memory and learning
About learning theories related to classroom learning
other

Notes

  1. ^ Greenberg Daniel [1987] Learning Free at Last - The Sudbury Valley School.
    "Sometimes, I feel the schools around us are the world's greatest example of the legend of the emperors new clothes. Year after year, they carry on calling themselves purveyors of knowledge, providers of education. When all else fails, money is applied as a plaster to heal the wounds.
    But it hardley makes a difference. Children will learn what they will learn, when they want and how they want, our best efforts notwithstanding.
    At Sudbury Valley, I see this truth in action all the time. I never have been able to unlock the secret of how they really do it.
    As a school, we don't make believe we know what we don't know. Our role is to stand by while the children, each and every one, choose their own varied paths. We help when asked. We stand aside when not asked."
    Retrieved January 9, 2010.
  2. ^ Greenberg, H. (1987), "The Silent Factor," The Sudbury Valley School Experience. Retrieved January 9, 2010.
  3. ^ Greenberg, H. (1987), "The Art of Doing Nothing," The Sudbury Valley School Experience. Retrieved January 9, 2010.
  4. ^ Mitra, S. (2007) Sugata Mitra shows how kids teach themselves (video – 20:59). Minimally Invasive Education. Retrieved January 9, 2010.
  5. ^ Russell L. Ackoff and Daniel Greenberg (2008), Turning Learning Right Side Up: Putting Education Back on Track (pdf) HTML. Retrieved January 9, 2010.
  6. ^ 'The Objective of Education Is Learning, Not Teaching,' Knowledge@Wharton, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved January 9, 2010.
  7. ^ Pittman, Romey, Ok, So You’re Sort of Like.... Retrieved January 9, 2010.
  8. ^ Theodora Polito, Educational Theory as Theory of Culture: A Vichian perspective on the educational theories of John Dewey and Kieran Egan Educational Philosophy and Theory, Vol. 37, No. 4, 2005

2-Learning in Adulthood a comprehensive guide by Sharan B. Merriam, Rosemary S. Caffarella, and Lisa M.Baumgartner. Third edition

  • Creating Learning Centered Classrooms. What Does Learning Theory Have To Say? ERIC Digest.
  • How People Learn (and What Technology Might Have To Do with It). ERIC Digest.
  • Critical-learning wiki
  • Applied Constructivism
  • About Learning 12 Learning Theories Described
  • Theory Into Practice (TIP) database brief summaries of 50 major theories of learning and instruction
  • Geary, David C. (2005), "Folk knowledge and academic learning", In B. J. Ellis & D. F. Bjorklund (Eds.), [http://www.guilford.com/cgi-bin/cartscript.cgi?page=pr/ellis.htm&dir=pp/dp&cart_id=208191.21056 Origins of the social mind] (PDF), New York: Guilford Publications, pp. 493–519 {{citation}}: External link in |title= (help)
  • Teaching in a Computer Lab
  • Encyclopaedia of Informal Education