Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pr0metheus burning (2nd nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band, fails WP:BAND. Previously deleted via AFD but that was quite a while ago so I thought new consensus was called for. Prod removed without comment. TheJazzDalek (talk) 00:46, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —TheJazzDalek (talk) 00:48, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This band doesn't meet any of the criteria for inclusion. —DoRD (talk) 02:39, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, hard to believe it's been over four years since the last AfD and they still only have 165 unique GHits. I really can't find anything in a reliable source that could indicate notability at all. Good luck to 'em, maybe in 2014. Glenfarclas (talk) 04:27, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Sadly, I can't find any independent coverage by any reliable sources. Criterion 5 of WP:BAND would be the most plausible argument to keep, but I don't believe Hive Records can realistically be considered a 'more important indie label' and even if it were the absence of outside coverage or other claim to notability would prevent me from !voting keep. J04n(talk page) 12:50, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:BAND IF "In addition to playing much of the east coast and midwest, the group has also played several shows in Canada over the years" can be proven true. Bearian (talk) 04:41, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]