Jump to content

Talk:The Desire of Ages

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by FeanorStar7 (talk | contribs) at 23:24, 25 January 2010. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconSeventh-day Adventist Church Stub‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Seventh-day Adventist Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WikiProject icon
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:
  • Expand "Glacier View Controversy" section, to include more background, history, theological issues, and details of the Glacier View meeting itself
  • Add to "Adventist Responses to Criticisms" section, ideally with material from Adventist scholars etc.
WikiProject iconBooks Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Request

I was contacted by a reference librarian at the Library of Congress. She asked me if I could delete the sentence:

The Desire of Ages was acclaimed by the United States Library of Congress in the 1950s as the most sought after book on the life of Christ.

She said that the Library does not endorse books at all and never did. So this sentence should be taken out because it's not true. I didn't want to simply remove it without an explanation. Please advise. --FeanorStar7 (talk) 23:24, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]