Helmut Kohl

This article is about the German politician. For the referee, see Helmut Kohl (referee).

Helmut Kohl
Chancellor of Germany
In office 1 October 1982 (West Germany) / 3 October 1990 (reunified Germany) – 27 October 1998
President	Karl Carstens Richard von Weizsäcker Roman Herzog
Preceded by	Helmut Schmidt
Succeeded by	Gerhard Schröder
Personal details
Born	(1930-04-03) 3 April 1930 Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany
Political party	CDU
Spouse(s)	Hannelore Kohl (died 2001) Maike Richter (since 2008)
Alma mater	University of Heidelberg
Profession	Historian, Political scientist, Politician
Signature

Dr. Helmut Josef Michael Kohl (born 3 April 1930) is a German conservative politician and statesman. He was Chancellor of Germany from 1982 to 1998 (of West Germany between 1982 and 1990 and of a reunited Germany between 1990 and 1998) and the chairman of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) from 1973 to 1998. His 16-year tenure was the longest of any German chancellor since Otto von Bismarck and oversaw the end of the Cold War and the German reunification. Kohl is widely regarded as one of the main architects of the German reunification and, together with French President François Mitterrand, the Maastricht Treaty, which created the European Union.

Kohl and François Mitterrand were the joint recipients of the Karlspreis in 1988. In 1998, Kohl was named Honorary Citizen of Europe by the European heads of state or government for his extraordinary work for European integration and cooperation, an honour previously only bestowed on Jean Monnet. In 1996 he won the prestigious Prince of Asturias Award in International Cooperation

Kohl has been described as "the greatest European leader of the second half of the 20th century" by former U.S. President George H. W. Bush.

Life

Youth

Kohl was born in Ludwigshafen am Rhein (at the time part of Bavaria, now in Rheinland-Pfalz) Germany, to Cäcilie (née Schnur; 1890–1979) and her husband Hans Kohl (1887–1975), a civil servant. He was the third child born into this conservative, Roman Catholic family which, before and after 1933, remained loyal to the Catholic Centre Party. His older brother died in the Second World War as a teenage soldier. In the last weeks of the war, Helmut Kohl was also drafted, but he was not involved in any combat.

Kohl attended the Ruprecht elementary school, and continued at the Max Planck Gymnasium. In 1946, he joined the recently founded CDU. In 1947, he was one of the co-founders of the Junge Union-branch in Ludwigshafen. After graduating in 1950, he began to study law in Frankfurt am Main. In 1951, he switched to the University of Heidelberg where he majored in History and Political Science. In 1953, he joined the board of the Rhineland-Palatinate branch of the CDU. In 1954, he became vice-chair of the Junge Union in Rhineland-Palatinate. In 1955, he returned to the board of the Rhineland-Palatinate branch of the CDU.

Life before politics

After graduating in 1956 he became fellow at the Alfred Weber Institute of the University of Heidelberg where he was an active member of the student society AIESEC. In 1958, he received his doctorate degree for his thesis "The Political Developments in the Palatinate and the Reconstruction of Political Parties after 1945". After that, he entered business, first as an assistant to the director of a foundry in Ludwigshafen and, in 1959, as a manager for the Industrial Union for Chemistry in Ludwigshafen. In this year, he also became chair of the Ludwigshafen branch of the CDU. In the following year, he married Hannelore Renner, whom he had known since 1948, and they had two sons.

Early political career

In 1960, he was elected into the municipal council of Ludwigshafen where he served as leader of the CDU party until 1969. In 1963, he was also elected into the Landtag of Rhineland-Palatinate and served as leader of the CDU party in that legislature. From 1966 until 1973, he served as the chair of the CDU, and he was also a member of the Federal CDU board. After his election as party-chair, he was named as the successor to Peter Altmeier, who was minister-president of Rhineland-Palatinate at the time. However, after the Landtag-election which followed, Altmeier remained minister-president.

Minister-President of Rhineland-Palatinate

Helmut Kohl, 1969

On 19 May 1969, Kohl was elected minister-president of Rhineland-Palatinate, as the successor to Peter Altmeier. During his term as minister-president, Kohl founded the University of Trier-Kaiserlautern and enacted territorial reform. Also in 1969, Kohl became the vice-chair of the federal CDU party.

In 1971, he was a candidate to become chairman of the federal CDU, but was not elected. Rainer Barzel remained in the position instead. In 1972, Barzel attempted to force a cabinet crisis in the SPD/FDP government, which failed, leading him to step down. In 1973, Kohl succeeded him as federal chairman; he retained this position until 1998.

The 1976 Bundestag election

In the 1976 federal election, Kohl was the CDU/CSU's candidate for chancellor. The CDU/CSU coalition performed very well, winning 48.6% of the vote. However they were kept out of government by the centre-left cabinet formed by the Social Democratic Party of Germany and Free Democratic Party (Germany), led by Social Democrat Helmut Schmidt. Kohl then retired as minister-president of Rhineland-Palatinate to become the leader of the CDU/CSU in the Bundestag. He was succeeded by Bernhard Vogel.

Leader of the opposition

In the 1980 federal elections, Kohl had to play second fiddle, when CSU-leader Franz Josef Strauß became the CDU/CSU's candidate for chancellor. Strauß was also unable to defeat the SPD/FDP alliance. Unlike Kohl, Strauß did not want to continue as the leader of the CDU/CSU and remained Minister-President of Bavaria. Kohl remained as leader of the opposition, under the third Schmidt cabinet (1980–82).

On 17 September 1982, a conflict of economic policy occurred between the governing SPD/FDP coalition partners. The FDP wanted to radically liberalise the labour market, while the SPD preferred to guarantee the employment of those who already had jobs. The FDP began talks with the CDU/CSU to form a new government.

Chancellor of West Germany

Rise to power

On 1 October 1982, the CDU proposed a constructive vote of no confidence which was supported by the FDP. The motion carried, and, on 4 October, the Bundestag voted in a new CDU/CSU-FDP coalition cabinet, with Kohl as the chancellor. Many of the important details of the new coalition had been hammered out on 20 September, though minor details were reportedly still being hammered out as the vote took place.

Though Kohl's election was done according to the Basic Law, some voices criticized the move as the FDP had fought its 1980 campaign on the side of the SPD and even placed Chancellor Schmidt on some of their campaign posters. Some voices went as far as denying the new government had the support of a majority of the people. To answer this question, the new government aimed at new elections at the earliest possible date.

Since the Basic Law is restrictive on the dissolution of parliament, Kohl had to take another controversial move: he called for a confidence vote only a month after being sworn in, in which members of his coalition abstained. The ostensibly negative result for Kohl then allowed President Karl Carstens to dissolve the Bundestag in January 1983.

The move was controversial as the coalition parties denied their votes to the same man they had elected Chancellor a month before and whom they wanted to re-elect after the parliamentary election. However, this step was condoned by the German Federal Constitutional Court as a legal instrument and was again applied (by SPD Chancellor Gerhard Schröder and his Green allies) in 2005.

The second cabinet

In the federal elections of March 1983, Kohl won a smashing victory. The CDU/CSU won 48.8%, while the FDP won 7.0%. Some opposition members of the Bundestag asked the Federal constitutional court to declare the whole proceedings unconstitutional. It denied their claim.

The second Kohl cabinet pushed through several controversial plans, including the stationing of NATO midrange missiles, against major opposition from the peace movement.

On 24 January 1984, Kohl spoke before the Israeli Knesset, as the first Chancellor of the post-war generation. In his speech, he used Günter Gaus' famous sentence, that he had "the mercy of a late birth".

On 22 September 1984 Kohl met the French president François Mitterrand at Verdun, where the Battle of Verdun between France and Germany had taken place during World War I. Together, they commemorated the deaths of both World Wars. The photograph, which depicted their minutes long handshake became an important symbol of French-German reconciliation. Kohl and Mitterrand developed a close political relationship, forming an important motor for European integration. Together, they laid the foundations for European projects, like Eurocorps and Arte. This French-German cooperation also was vital for important European projects, like the Treaty of Maastricht and the Euro.

In 1985, Kohl and US President Ronald Reagan, as part of a plan to observe the 40th anniversary of V-E Day, saw an opportunity to demonstrate the strength of the friendship that existed between Germany and its former foe. During a November 1984 visit to the White House, Kohl appealed to Reagan to join him in symbolizing the reconciliation of their two countries at a German military cemetery. As Reagan visited Germany as part of the G6 conference in Bonn, the pair visited Bergen-Belsen concentration camp on 5 May, and more controversially the German military cemetery in Bitburg, discovered to hold 49 members of the Waffen-SS buried there.

In 1986, more controversy was caused by an essay published in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung on 25 April 1986 entitled "Land Without A History" written by one of Kohl's advisors, the historian Michael Stürmer, in which Stürmer argued that West Germany lacked a history to be proud of, and called for effort on the part of the government, historians and the media to be build national pride in German history. Though Stürmer insisted that he was writing on behalf of himself and not in an official capacity as the Chancellor's advisor, many left-wing intellectuals claimed that Stürmer's essay also expressed Kohl's views.

The third cabinet

Chancellor Kohl behind and to the right of U.S. President Ronald Reagan (center) at the Brandenburg Gate. President Reagan, challenging Gorbachev to "tear down this wall!" in 1987

After the federal elections of 1987 Kohl won a slightly reduced majority and formed his third cabinet. The SPD's candidate for chancellor was the Minister-President of North Rhine-Westphalia, Johannes Rau.

In 1987, Kohl received East German leader Erich Honecker - the first ever visit by an East German head of state to West Germany. This is generally seen as a sign that Kohl pursued Ostpolitik, a policy of détente between East and West that had been begun by the SPD-led governments (and strongly opposed by Kohl's own CDU) during the 1970s. Following the breach of the Berlin Wall in 1989, Kohl's handling of the East German issue would become the turning point of his chancellorship.

The road to reunification

Main article: German reunification

Helmut Kohl in Krzyżowa (Kreisau), Poland, 1989.

Taking advantage of the historic political changes occurring in East Germany, Kohl presented a ten point plan for "Overcoming of the division of Germany and Europe" without consulting his coalition partner, the FDP, or the Western Allies. In February 1990, he visited the Soviet Union seeking a guarantee from Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev that the USSR would allow German reunification to proceed. On 18 May 1990, he signed an economic and social union treaty with East Germany. Against the will of the president of the German federal bank, he allowed a 1:1 exchange rate for wages, interest and rent between the West and East Marks. In the end, this policy would seriously hurt companies in the new federal states. Together with Foreign Minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher, Kohl was able to resolve talks with the former Allies of World War II to allow German reunification and the expansion of the NATO into the former East German state. On 3 October 1990, the East German state was abolished and its territory reunified with West Germany. After the fall of the Berlin Wall Kohl, confirmed that historically German territories east of the Oder-Neisse line were definitively part of the Republic of Poland, thereby finally ending the West German territorial claims. In 1993, Kohl confirmed, in a treaty with the Czech Republic, that Germany would no longer bring forward territorial claims as to the pre-1945 ethnic German so-called Sudetenland. This was a disappointment for the German Heimatvertriebene, displaced persons.

Chancellor of reunified Germany

Helmut Kohl in 1990.

After the 1990 elections– the first free, fair and democratic all-German elections since the Weimar Republic era– Kohl won by a landslide over opposition candidate and Minister-President of Saarland, Oskar Lafontaine. He formed the Cabinet Kohl IV.

After the federal elections of 1994 Kohl was narrowly re-elected. He defeated the Minister-President of Rhineland-Palatinate Rudolf Scharping. The SPD was however able to win a majority in the Bundesrat, which significantly limited Kohl's power. In foreign politics, Kohl was more successful, for instance getting Frankfurt am Main as the seat for the European Central Bank. In 1997, Kohl received the Vision for Europe Award for his efforts in the unification of Europe.

By the late 1990s, the aura surrounding Kohl had largely worn off amid rising unemployment. He was heavily defeated in the 1998 federal elections by the Minister-President of Lower Saxony, Gerhard Schröder.

Retirement and legal troubles

A red-green coalition government led by Schröder replaced Kohl's government on 27 October 1998. He immediately resigned as CDU leader and largely retired from politics. However, he remained a member of the Bundestag until he decided not to run for reelection in the 2002 election.

CDU finance affair

Kohl's life after politics was characterized by the CDU-party finance scandal and by developments in his personal life.

A party financing scandal became public in 1999, when it was discovered that the CDU had received and maintained illegal funding under his leadership.

Investigations by the Bundestag into the sources of illegal CDU funds, mainly stored in Geneva bank accounts, revealed two sources. One was the sale of German tanks to Saudi Arabia (kickback question), while the other was the privatization fraud in collusion with the late French President François Mitterrand who wanted 2,550 unused allotments in the former East Germany for the then French owned Elf Aquitaine. In December 1994 the CDU majority in the Bundestag enacted a law that nullified all rights of the current owners. Over 300 million DM in illegal funds were discovered in accounts in the canton Geneva. The fraudulently acquired allotments were then privatized as part of Elf Aquitaine and ended up with TotalFinaElf, now Total S.A., after amalgamation.

Kohl himself claimed that Elf Aquitaine had offered (and meanwhile made) a massive investment in East Germany's chemical industry together with the takeover of 2,000 gas stations in Germany which were formerly owned by national oil company Minol. Elf Aquitaine is supposed to have financed CDU illegally, as ordered by Mitterrand, as it was usual practice in African countries.

Kohl and other German and French politicians defended themselves that they were promoting reconciliation and cooperation between France and Germany for the sake of European integration and peace, and that they had no personal motives for accepting foreign party funding.

These scandal matters are still under investigation. The German-Canadian businessman Karlheinz Schreiber, a longtime associate of Kohl's late CSU political rival Franz Josef Strauß, is wanted by Bavarian prosecutors on charges of fraud and corruption, but Schreiber has been fighting extradition from Canada to Germany for more than eight years, since the summer of 1999. Schreiber who is freed on bail in Canada as of April, 2008, filed an affidavit implicating former Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, another business associate of his. The Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper called on 13 November 2007, for a public inquiry to probe Schreiber's statements.

Life after politics

Kohl and Vladimir Putin in 2000

Kohl and Garry Kasparov

In 2002, Kohl left the Bundestag and officially retreated from politics. In recent years, Kohl has been largely rehabilitated by his party again. After taking office, Angela Merkel invited her former patron to the Chancellor's Office and Ronald Pofalla, the Secretary-General of the CDU, announced that the CDU will cooperate more closely with Kohl, "to take advantage of the experience of this great statesman", as Pofalla put it. However, Kohl has retreated from public life to a far greater extent than his predecessor Helmut Schmidt.

On 5 July 2001, Hannelore Kohl, his wife, committed suicide, after suffering from photodermatitis for years. On 4 March 2004, he published the first of his memoirs, called "Memories 1930–1982", covering the period 1930 to 1982, when he became chancellor. The second part, published on 3 November 2005, included the first half of his chancellorship (from 1982 to 1990). On 28 December 2004, Kohl was air-lifted by the Sri Lankan Air Force, after having been stranded in a hotel by the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake.

He is a member of the Club of Madrid.

As reported in the German press, he also gave his name to the soon-to-be launched Helmut Kohl Centre for European Studies (currently 'Centre for European Studies'), which is the new political foundation of the European People's Party.

In April 2008, Kohl was reported to be in intensive care due to a falling accident earlier in the year, and incapable of speaking. Subsequent to his recovery, he married his 43-year-old partner, Maike Richter, on 8 May 2008.

Political views

User talk:Edgar181 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search

Chasaren aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche

Die Chasaren (auch Khasaren, heb. Kuzarim כוזרים; türk. Hazarlar; griech. Χάζαροι; russ. Хазары; tatar. Xäzärlär; persisch ‏خزر‎; lat. Gazari oder Cosri) waren ein ursprünglich nomadisches und später halbnomadisches Turkvolk[1] in Zentralasien.

Im 7. Jahrhundert nach Chr. gründeten die Chasaren ein unabhängiges Khaganat im nördlichen Kaukasus an der Küste des Kaspischen Meeres. Ab dem 8. bis frühen 9. Jahrhundert wurde die jüdischen Religion zur Staatsreligion. Ob nur eine dünne Oberschicht oder auch die übrige Bevölkerung die neue Religion annahm und praktizierte, ist umstritten. Auf der Höhe ihrer Macht kontrollierten sie weite Teile des heutigen Südrusslands, den Westen des späteren Kasachstans, die Ostukraine, Teile des Kaukasus sowie die Halbinsel Krim. Die Chasaren waren wichtige Bundesgenossen des Byzantinischen Reichs gegen das Sassanidenreich und waren auf der Blüte ihrer Machtentfaltung eine bedeutende Regionalmacht. Sie führten eine Reihe erfolgreicher Kriege gegen die arabischen Kalifate, wodurch sie möglicherweise eine arabische Invasion Osteuropas verhinderten. Am Ende des 10. Jahrhunderts wurde ihre Macht durch die aufstrebende Kiewer Rus gebrochen und die Chasaren verschwanden weitgehend aus der Geschichte.

Einige Historiker, u.A. an israelischen Universitäten, wie Shlomo Sand und Israel Bartal, halten es für möglich, dass ein großer Teil der Chasaren im osteuropäischen Judentum aufgegangen ist. Dem widersprechen genetische Untersuchungen, nach denen die aschkenasische Bevölkerung überwiegend nahöstlicher Herkunft ist, sodass die Chasaren entweder nur einen kleinen oder keinen Anteil an der Vorfahrenschaft der Aschkenasim haben können.[2] [3] Inhaltsverzeichnis [Verbergen]

  * 1 Ausdehnung
  * 2 Ursprünge und Vorgeschichte
  * 3 Stämme
  * 4 Aufstieg
        o 4.1 Entstehung des chasarischen Staates
        o 4.2 Die Chasaren und Byzanz
        o 4.3 Zweiter chasarisch-arabischer Krieg
  * 5 Religion
        o 5.1 Türkischer Schamanismus (Tengrismus)
        o 5.2 Hinwendung zur jüdischen Religion und Beziehungen zum Judentum
        o 5.3 Andere Religionen
  * 6 Der Staat
        o 6.1 Das chasarische Königtum
        o 6.2 Armee
        o 6.3 Andere Amtsträger
        o 6.4 Gerichtswesen
  * 7 Wirtschaft
        o 7.1 Handel
        o 7.2 Chasarisches Münzwesen
  * 8 Chasarischer Einfluss
        o 8.1 Chasarische Städte
        o 8.2 Tributpflichtige und unterworfene Nationen
  * 9 Niedergang und Zerfall
        o 9.1 Der Aufstieg der Rus
        o 9.2 Die kabarische Rebellion und die Auswanderung der Magyaren
        o 9.3 Feindschaft mit der Rus und Byzanz
        o 9.4 Chasaren außerhalb des Chasarenreichs
  * 10 Späte Berichte über die Chasaren
        o 10.1 Jüdische Quellen
        o 10.2 Islamische Quellen
        o 10.3 Berichte aus der Kiewer Rus
        o 10.4 Byzantinische, georgische und armenische Quellen
        o 10.5 Westliche Quellen
  * 11 Strittige Fragen
        o 11.1 Zeitpunkt und Ausmaß der Konversion zum Judentum
        o 11.2 Spekulationen über mögliche historische Nachfolger der Chasaren
  * 12 Siehe auch
  * 13 Literatur
  * 14 Weblinks
  * 15 Referenzen

Ausdehnung [Bearbeiten] Reich der Chasaren

Im 9. Jahrhundert erstreckte sich das Chasarische Khaganat über die gesamte südrussische Steppe zwischen Wolga und Dnepr bis an den Kaukasus. Es umfasste die heutigen Gebiete von Georgien und Armenien. Die nördliche Grenze befand sich nord-östlich des späteren Moskau am Oberlauf der Wolga. Damit war das Chasarenreich auf dem Höhepunkt seiner Macht mindestens dreimal so groß wie das Frankenreich Mitteleuropas. Sein Gebiet wurde jedoch weniger straff beherrscht und zentral organisiert. Über Jahrhunderte kontrollierten die Chasaren vor der Jahrtausendwende den Handel mit Gewürzen, Textilien und Sklaven auf Teilen der Seidenstraße und auf den Handelswegen zwischen Konstantinopel und dem Baltikum. An der Ostgrenze und teilweise innerhalb des tributpflichtigen Gebietes lebten Magyaren. Weitreichende Handelsbeziehungen unterhielten sie zudem nach Westen bis ins Kalifat von Córdoba. Ursprünge und Vorgeschichte [Bearbeiten]

Der Name Chasaren könnte von einem türkischen Wort für „Umherziehen“ (gezer in modernem Türkisch) abgele 82.113.121.103 (talk) 12:08, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Please read before editing:

  1. Please add new comments to the bottom of the page. You can use the "new section" button above to start a new topic.
  2. In general, I will respond here to comments, rather than on your talk page, so that the conversation isn't scattered.
  3. If you want to know why I blocked an IP address, you have to let me know what IP address you are referring to.
  4. If you want to know why I deleted an article, you have to let me know what article you are referring to.

Archive

Archives

   * Oct 2005 - May 2006
   * Jun 2006 - Sep 2006
   * Oct 2006 - Feb 2007
   * Mar 2007 - May 2007
   * Jun 2007 - Sep 2007
   * Oct 2007 - Dec 2007
   * Jan 2008 - Mar 2008
   * Apr 2008 - Jun 2008
   * Jul 2008 - Sep 2008
   * Oct 2008 - Dec 2008
   * Jan 2009 - Mar 2009
   * Apr 2009 - Aug 2009
   * Sep 2009 - Dec 2009

Contents [hide]

   * 1 Nitric acid/Agenothree
   * 2 AdacoRevisionVA
   * 3 Page deletion
   * 4 Deletion of Page:Juthiasm
   * 5 Octagon Credit Investors
   * 6 Wetware Hacker
   * 7 Deletion of "A.K.A.C.O.D."
   * 8 Goodbye
   * 9 Editing
   * 10 Deletion of the Larry and Carol Leve Institute for Entrepreneurial Practice
   * 11 expw: consulting
   * 12 Anon vandalizing Planned Parenthood
   * 13 Deletion
   * 14 Diego Morales

[edit] Nitric acid/Agenothree

I'm not a particularly prolific editor, but I do have a bit of information regarding this minor debate.

Having read the Pern books, I happen to know that the comment about nitric acid being known as "agenothree" in those books is correct for two reasons:

First off - and this really should have been mentioned in the original reference - "agenothree" is used as a component in the fuel used by Pernese flamethrower teams when combating Thread infestations (Thread being a highly voracious organism which is extremely susceptible to incendiary attack). Having compared the properties of nitric acid (HNO3) and silver nitrate (AgNO3), it would be more likely that nitric acid is the chemical in question, as it is the only chemical of the two that would work as a flamethrower-fuel component (probably in combination with a substance akin to turpentine). The name "agenothree" is a classic case of elision.

Secondly - if memory serves - several of the more recent books deals with the discovery of equipment belonging to the original settlers, and in one of those books it is explicitly stated that agenothree is nitric acid.

Just thought I'd let you know, as I've re-added the reference. (I, personally, believe it's relevant, as the Pernese flamethrowers are a good example of how a hypergolic reaction between nitric acid and certain organic compounds - e.g., turpentine - can be beneficial.)

--Special Operative MACAVITYDebrief me 16:06, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

   Personally, I think this reference is completely irrelevant to the article about nitric acid and that entirely fictional uses of a chemical compound do not make good examples of real-world usefulness. But, in any case, I won't remove what you have added to the article. Cheers, -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:23, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

[edit] AdacoRevisionVA

The article was deleted for copyright infringement (you referenced information from Adaco's website). Acting under the request of President of Adaco, we are attempting to publish this article. Please let me know what we need to do in order to successfully post the article. I'm sure the President will verify his desire for the article to be published here by us. Also, it appears it was deleted earlier for Advertising or Promotion. Please let us know what to do in order to correct this also. We do not wish to violate any of Wikipedia's policies. Lastly, the article should just be entitled "Adaco" not AdacoRevisionVA, however I believe that is my assistant's fault. Thank you very much.

   Since it is possible for anyone to claim online that published material is their own, whether it is true or not, Wikipedia has a verification process. You can read about it at this link: Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. You can follow the directions there to make your published text available to Wikipedia. However, an article about the company Adaco should be written from a neutral point of view, rather than from Adaco's point of view, as you would find on the company's own website, which naturally comes across as advertising or promotional material. Also, you might want to first have a look at Wikipedia's notability guidelines for corporations (at WP:CORP), to see if it meets inclusion criteria. Finally, Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines (WP:COI) seem to apply here as well. I hope this helps. -- Ed (Edgar181) 23:55, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Page deletion

Hi Edgar,

A quick follow up on your recent page deletion. This is a global brand and I considered it to be very non-promotional. Could we discuss how it could be edited? Since Wiki is translated it would be great to have the extra visibility in other countries.

Content not all that different from this in terms of relation to a larger brand (this is Pepsi whereas that page was a brand within Life Technologies). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaj3276 (talk • contribs) 23:42, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tropicana_Products

Thanks,

Jason —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaj3276 (talk • contribs) 23:22, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

   Assuming that you are talking about the articles GIBCO™ and GIBCO which I deleted, with phrases such as "worlds leading manufacturing organizations", they both appeared promotional to me, and therefore met one of Wikipedia's criteria for deletion (see Wikipedia:CSD#G11). Also, it seems that information pertaining to this brand would probably be better suited to the article about the company Invitrogen anyway. Some brands may have notability independent of the company that owns them, but in general I think that is an exception. -- Ed (Edgar181) 00:11, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

I guess a better example would be http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millipore_Corporation and their listing of "Milli-Q" (industry specific). In terms of notability I am showing over 3,000 references to this brand in pubmed.com. The only reason I posted it was because I saw others in this industry setting up similar articles. Do you think there is a way I could customize the article to be less promotional and allow it to stay? I would be happy to put another version together and request your approval before posting.

Invitrogen has some 400 brands associated with it so I am afraid this would be lost and it really is a well known name globally.

Thanks,

Jason —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaj3276 (talk • contribs) 00:50, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

   If you think GIBCO meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines, please feel free to recreate it. I would recommend make the tone more neutral, or it may end up being deleted again. I have copied the deleted article temporarily to User:Jaj3276/GIBCO where you can work on it, then it can be copied back to an appropriate title. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:16, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion of Page:Juthiasm

Hey Edgar, I am a huge follower of Juthiasm. My name is Steve by the way. I would like to know why you had labeled my page as a "hoax". Juthiasm is actually a true belief, and I have no idea why anyone would think it is a hoax. I created the page so that people would understand Juthiasm and its context a little bit better. This religion has over 1000 followers, and if you would like me to bring them into this, I'm pretty sure I could get a petition or something going. I truly do not want to sound like a complete utter jerk, but I am a little angry that you deleted my page...but I won't take my anger out on you. And I will say, that I know for a fact that this Religion is NOT a hoax...its a belief. And we all have our beliefs, and just because some are a little out there, doesnt mean that they are considered a "hoax". Like Christianity, is that a hoax too? I dont think it is. But please, I would like to know what you think about this is a hoax. -Steve Johannan —Preceding unsigned comment added by JuthiesmReligiousCenter (talk • contribs) 04:33, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

   If you want to claim that Juthiasm (or is it Juthiesm?) is not a hoax, you will need to provide some evidence that distinguishes it from something you just made up. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:16, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Octagon Credit Investors

Hi there. Just wanted to let you know that the article which you deleted a few minutes ago is back again. Amsaim (talk) 16:03, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

   I have deleted it again. Thanks for letting me know. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:06, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

       The article is back the third time within 40 minutes. :). This seems to be a persistent editor, who desperately wants to use Wikipedia as a promotional platform. Amsaim (talk) 16:15, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

           I generally don't like to randomly stick my nose in other people's business but I saw this conversation on my watchlist and thought I would let the parties involved know that I've asked for this page to be deleted again and salted at RfP. Bmg916 (talk) 16:40, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

               Deleted once again. Thank you, both. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:09, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Wetware Hacker

Hey, wait!! Just happened upon this page. Don't know the specifics. But, am raising the questions, just for the record. That is, the discussion page is empty.

What is the underlying argument for deletion? Legalities? Fear of the truth? Some ideologically oriented backlash?

Consider, many authors have stressed the 'neuropeptidergic' natures of ourselves. One example: 3-lb Universe (c 1980s). That street activity related to the altering chemicals is dangerous and not to be condoned does not require that professional study and research be thwarted. In fact, a survey would show that many under-the-radar projects have continued since the time of Leary and have shown very important results. Some of this research is encouraging in offering ways to get out of deep dodo.

Okay, there are problems with potential inalterable physical damage. That is taken into consideration and such research is not, by necessity, harmful. As an aside, a generation altered with things like anti-depressants and suppressants was done, not as an experiment, but rather as a means for control. That is science?

It could be that the stated work is more autodidactic than not. Absence of an institutional backdrop is not evidence of any lack of potential coming from research.

Okay, a rename (it is a little provacative) and rewrite (showing sources to related research - other than hacking, it would be a research/subject relationship) may be in order. Other pages may be covering the topic. But, without showing that such is the case, the page more needs improvement than suppression. 69.155.44.184 (talk) 15:07, 17 January 2010 (UTC) Caught by a session timeout. jmswtlk (talk) 15:09, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

       Clarification, I didn't see this vote page before and just voted there. Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Wetware_hacker. It's an important subject from several viewpoints. Apologies Edgar, but your link seemed to be prominent on the original page. Comments here stand albeit subject to reconsideration as facts unfold. Thanks. jmswtlk (talk) 16:08, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion of "A.K.A.C.O.D."

I wish to recreate the article on one of Boston's most unusual and notable bands. Could you please explain the reason for deletion of the page and suggest whether or not recreation of the page would be a useful idea? --Nmatavka (talk) 23:40, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

   The version of A.K.A.C.O.D. that I deleted three years ago contained no information that suggested the band was notable; therefore, it met Wikipedia's criteria for deletion (WP:CSD#A7). I see that you have recreated the article, which is fine with me, but please keep in mind that if the content of the article does not demonstrate that the band meets Wikipedia's inclusion criteria (see WP:BAND), it may end up being deleted again. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:49, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Goodbye

As it has become painfully obvious, my contributions are no longer welcome or needed here. In light of this situation, I am leaving this screwed up bureaucracy for the conceivable future. Good luck, my friend and keep fighting the good fight. ILLEGITIMUS NON CARBORUNDUM WuhWuzDat 02:40, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

   I'm sorry to hear about your experience. I hope you find something more satisfying to do with your time, and of course you're always welcome back here when the time is right for you. Cheers, -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:51, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Editing

If I make an edit to a page, how am i supposed to know whether or not it got deleted days after I made the edit? Will i get notified or something like that?

P.S. is this the right place for me to be asking questions? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.249.27.247 (talk) 17:26, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

   You won't necessarily get notified if others undue an edit you made. However, as you have found out, if you make unconstructive edits to an article, you will generally be warned to stop. At any time, if you would like to see what changes have been made to an article, to check if a change you made has been undone or not, you can click on the "history" tab at the top of that page. I don't mind answering questions like this, but you'll probably get faster (and perhaps more helpful) answers at the help desk: Wikipedia:Help desk. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:00, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion of the Larry and Carol Leve Institute for Entrepreneurial Practice

Hi, I'm a new user and I'm not totally clear on protocol, but I won't argue with your deletion based on the idea that the page I wrote was "advertising". I would, however, like the content back so that I can re-work it and hopefully put it back up in a way that you and your colleagues find appropriate for Wikipedia (I am an intern and this is an assignment that needs to be completed). Is it possible for you to return the content to me and, in the future, alert me before you delete a page so that I can save the content?

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aspenlj (talk • contribs) 23:03, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

   OK, I have restored the content to User:Aspenlj/The Larry and Carol Levy Institute for Entrepreneurial Practice. You may also want to have a look at Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines, which seem to apply here. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:28, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

[edit] expw: consulting

Hi, could you please let us know how the entries for bigger consulting firms such as Accenture, Deloitte, Bain & Company etc do not go against your page guidelines and why are they not treated as advertisements? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Webwyse (talk • contribs) 15:27, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

   I haven't looked at those other articles. If you think they also violate Wikipedia's guidelines against advertising, please feel free to nominate them for deletion. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:33, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Anon vandalizing Planned Parenthood

See [1]. Multiple reverts - same editor, different IP. Mattnad (talk)

   It looks like another admin has already protected that page. If you find that the problem moves to another page, please let me know. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:16, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion

You deleted my page on manufism and stated that it was a hoax. Manufism is certainly not a hoax. Why did you delete it? 74.93.118.125 (talk) 19:21, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

   If you want to know why I deleted an article, you have to let me know the name of the article you are referring to. There has never been an article titled manufism. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:04, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Diego Morales

Hi, can you remove "Elvira" from his name please? I'm not 100% positive, but I don't think it belongs. Thanks. 72.65.205.49 (talk) 02:23, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

   I'm sure you're right. I have removed it. Thanks for catching that. -- Ed (Edgar181) 02:25, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

       Thanks!72.65.205.49 (talk) 02:26, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Edgar181" Views

   * User page
   * Discussion
   * Edit this page
   * New section
   * History

Personal tools

   * Try Beta
   * Log in / create account

Navigation

   * Main page
   * Contents
   * Featured content
   * Current events
   * Random article

Search

Interaction

   * About Wikipedia
   * Community portal
   * Recent changes
   * Contact Wikipedia
   * Donate to Wikipedia
   * Help

Toolbox

   * What links here
   * Related changes
   * User contributions
   * Logs
   * Upload file
   * Special pages
   * Printable version
   * Permanent link

Kohl had strong, although complex and somewhat ambiguous political views, focusing on economic matters and on international politics.

Economically, Kohl's political views and policies were influenced by Ronald Reagan's and Margaret Thatcher's free market beliefs like reform of the welfare state and lowering taxation.

In international politics Kohl was committed to European integration, maintaining close relations with the French president Mitterrand. Parallel to this he was committed to German Reunification. Although he continued the Ostpolitik of his social-democratic predecessor, Kohl also supported Reagan's more aggressive policies in order to weaken the USSR.

Public perception

Kohl faced stiff opposition from the West German political left and was as well mocked upon for his provincial background, physical stature and simple language. Similar to historical french cartoons of Louis-Philippe of France, Hans Traxler depicted Kohl as pear in the left leaning satirical journal Titanic. The German expression Birne became a widespread nickname and symbol for the Kanzler.

The public ridicule subsided as Kohl's political star began to rise: as the leader of European integration and an important figure in the German reunification. Kohl became one of the most popular politicians in Germany and a greatly respected European statesman.

Honors

• In 1988, Kohl and Mitterrand received the Karlspreis for his contribution to Franco-German friendship and European Union.
• In 1996, Kohl received the Prince of Asturias Award in International Cooperation
• In 1996, he was made honorary doctor of the Catholic University of Louvain.
• In 1996, Kohl received an order for his humanitarian achievements from the Jewish organisation B'nai B'rith.
• In 1996, Kohl received a Doctor of Humanities, Honoris Causa from the Ateneo de Manila University in the Philippines, a Jesuit run institution.
• On 11 December 1998, he was made honorary citizen of Europe, a title which only Jean Monnet had received before.
• In 1998, he received an honorary doctor of laws degree from Brandeis University in Massachusetts.
• In 1998, he was only the second person to be awarded the Grand Cross in Special Design of the Order of Merit of the Federal Republic of Germany, the other being Konrad Adenauer.
• In 1999, Kohl received Presidential Medal of Freedom from U.S. President Clinton.
• Kohl is honorary citizen of both Frankfurt am Main and Berlin. On 2 September 2005, he was made an honorary citizen of his home town, Ludwigshafen.
• In 2007, he received the Gold Medal of the Jean Monnet Foundation for Europe for his contribution to the unity of Europe.