This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
i removed the tag. the intro to the article has been edited a bit since then. if you feel the edits still aren't sufficient, feel free to reinsert the tag but please leave some specific suggestions as to what's missing from the article or what you feel is confusing. thanks. Lunch04:48, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It would be helpful to me if the parallel to the Fourier Transform was better-developed. I'm just a humble computer science major, not a mathematician, and I understand the Fourier transform quite well, but I can get no understanding of what's going on here at all. -- Canar (talk) 22:44, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
braket notation
why does the inner product notation smack of dirac's bra ket notation in quantum notation. the whole thing smacks of quantum mechanis and seems vaguely familiar.Godspeed John Glenn!Will20:36, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]