Talk:Tosh.0
This article was nominated for deletion on 14 August 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
Comedy Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Television Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
The introduction sounds like it's a promotion of the show, Tosh.0. It should be rewritten. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.217.12.210 (talk) 06:16, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
I don't think it links to the right Mike Gibbons. That is, unless zombies are allowed to be executive producers nowadays. --76.117.110.236 (talk) 06:47, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
I would have to agree, i have removed the link —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.71.42.117 (talk) 05:13, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
I think we need several more "no sources" banners on this page. I didn't notice till... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.238.100.182 (talk) 01:25, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Editing
As Daniel just requested that his viewers edit this entry, Wikipedia should immediately remove the editing block and allow people to get on with the vandalism as requested by the subject of the article.Thebigcurve (talk) 04:08, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Hells yeah! C'mon unlock it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Waterygrave (talk • contribs) 04:34, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
In the style of...
Currently the page states "In the style of Web Soup. This seems a bit inacurate considering Web Soup was developed completely independently and actually started days after Tosh.0? You could argue it's in the style of the original Soup show, or that around the net segment of Attack of the Show, but considering it started before and has signifigantly higher ratings than Web Soup, the description seems wrong. If no one objects, I'll change it. Iarann (talk) 05:12, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
This Page is about to get Covered in Shit Edits
On his show today the Tosh guy invited his viewers to edit the Tosh.0 Wikipedia page, and announced that he's going to read the funniest edits next week. Just given you bros the heads up. 8bit (talk) 04:05, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
On another note, I invite all vandalism to be redirected to my talk page. Just click the little 'talk' button next to my name. Have fun, bros. 8bit (talk) 04:56, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Protected in violation of policy
From Wikipedia:Protection_policy#Semi-protection :
- "Semi-protection should not be used as a pre-emptive measure against vandalism that has not yet occurred,"
So why is this page already protected when there has been no vandalism? kenj0418 (talk) 04:48, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- There was vandalism, you just can't see it. It's been deleted. Q T C 04:51, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- I saw vandalism before the lock was applied. Check the page history. 8bit (talk) 04:55, 28 January 2010 (UTC)