User talk:KramarDanIkabu

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --Ragib 2 July 2005 03:18 (UTC)

I've been here for a while now, but I guess it's never too late for a welcoming. ^^ KramarDanIkabu 2 July 2005 04:24 (UTC)

nonsense at Revenge of the Sith

Way to go resolving the issues at Revenge of the Sith. That went on far too long. Thanks --Staecker 6 July 2005 05:30 (UTC)

Thanks. I was looking up mediation and was reading up on everything when I realised the way that everyone could get what they wanted. KramarDanIkabu 6 July 2005 05:35 (UTC)

I regret to inform you that people keep adding uncredited roles to the Offcial Cast. I have had to revert it three times now. I have kept my word, and have even added uncredited roles to its section, but it seems some people just don't get it. What can be done? Thanks. Copperchair 7 July 2005 02:05 (UTC)

Sounds like an id10t problem to me. j/k, but some people are just stupid and stubborn. I'm not sure how to solve that one beyond mediation or page protection. You can talk it out, hopefully, but at the worst are those two solutions. I figured out the credits problem, I'm sadly not a psychologist. KramarDanIkabu 7 July 2005 02:39 (UTC)

Beast Boy

Hi: When reverting, please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning. Unexplained reversions often upset the original writer and lead to damaging edit wars. —Theo (Talk) 10:16, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'm just getting really tired of this Dvirgueza crap, and it's kind of getting to me. I mean, I was gone for a week but the problem still hasn't been fully solved. KramarDanIkabu 16:23, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I understand: reverting a very active editor who seems to be vandalizing soon becomes tiresome. Fortunately, my web client (Firefox) caches field entries so repetition of similar summaries is eased. No matter how jaded we become, however, it is important to remain transparent in our actions. Dvirgueza has been blocked (again) so the next stage is ArbCom if s/he really gets to you. Squeak if you feel the need for help or support. —Theo (Talk) 17:08, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is settled

How am I a hero? Copperchair 07:37, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think I might have used the wrong word (I was in a hurry). What I probably meant was "good guy," as in you're swinging on the right side of the ropes in that situation as opposed to the shit a month or so back. I just felt that it was weird how someone who I antagonized during that time had become a protagonist in facing the new problems. Unfortunately, this time it doesn't seem the issue was settled properly and instead we are left with bullshit. KramarDanIkabu 07:05, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User categorization

Greetings, KramarDanIkabu! Please accept this message as an invitation to categorize your user page in the category Category:Wikipedians in Washington and removing your name from the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Washington page. The page will be deleted when all users have been removed. Even if you do not wish to be placed in a category, could you take a moment to remove your name from the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Washington page? Thanks!!

To add your name to the category, please use the tag [[Category:Wikipedians in Washington|KramarDanIkabu]] to ensure proper sorting.

For more information, please see Wikipedia:User categorisation and Category:Wikipedians by location. -- Roby Wayne ^{Talk • Hist} 06:55, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lost deletion

Lost (2004 television series); 20:20 . . KramarDanIkabu (Talk) (→Cast & characters - he's currently appeared in one episode, credited as a guest)

As you like, but the same is true of Michelle Rodriguez. Hashashin 06:42, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You got me there. ^^ However, she is credited on the official cast now, but we don't have the other two new actors added, so I put it up on the talk page to see what everyone else thinks. KramarDanIkabu (talk) 16:57, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vote on moving Lost (2004 television series) to Lost (TV series)

Hi. Just a quick note that we're voting (again) on renaming/moving the Lost (2004 television series) article, this time to the shorter Lost (TV series). As you were a participant in the previous discussion/vote, please register your support or opposition here: Talk:Lost (2004 television series) Thanks! LeFlyman 05:35, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

TitansGo.net

I was just reading on Talk:Minor characters in Teen Titans (animated series) that you got permission from the owner of that site to use screenshots from his page. Which is great, but there's a problem, namely this. Now, the screenshots can still probably be tagged using Template:Film-screenshot, but that still means that stuff like the infobox image on Starfire (comics). Anyway, I've had good experiences with you before (and I see you doing good work on my watchlist all the time), so I though maybe you could help me either resolve this copyright issue and start tagging images, or to find some replacements (also, I'm fairly sure the actual email from the site owner needs to be posted somewhere as evidence). Thanks in advance! --InShaneee 20:11, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I see where you're coming from. I'll get to putting {{copyrighted}} as soon as I can. I never actually finished uploading all the images I wanted to. Anyways, thanks for bringing this to my attention. As for the email, I'm not sure exactly where I can post it. KramarDanIkabu (speak) 20:29, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, hang on! Just so we're clear, the "copyrighted" template is depreciated, and not supposed to be used anywhere (as images to which that tag apply aren't suitable for use on wikipedia). Hence, the dillema! --InShaneee 20:57, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Then I guess we have to get rid of the images. KramarDanIkabu (speak) 23:09, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunatly. I know I can't see any way around it. Which means, among other things, we're gonna need to find a new image of Starfire from the comics to replace that one. --InShaneee 05:23, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

friendly invitation

u are invited to participate as much as u want in the development of the new format of the list of villains. the changes and details are discussed on its talk page. please hear at least 3 diferent opinions before making drastic changes. the idea of the new format is to make the page more serious and to aviod its non stopping AfD nominations that characterized it. the page kept surviving because the idea is good, but it gets AdF nominations on a regular basis because it lacked of encyclopedic organization. Categories can give users a better idea of the characters context.--T-man, the Wise Scarecrow 21:08, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome!

No problems. By the way, you might want to look at your signature, since it appears as this: KramarDanIkabu [[User talk:KramarDanIkabu|(speak)]] 02:06, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thought you might want to know. - Akamad 02:09, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why it converts those two brackets to their entity values. I assumed it was a bug of some sort, but it hasn't gone away yet. KramarDanIkabu [[User talk:KramarDanIkabu|(speak)]] 02:13, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you should ask on the Wikipedia:Help desk. - Akamad 02:16, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

please

Im not that other dude, and Im not yelling and getitng in anybdy's face. I putack a revised version and stuck it in the Disputed section. If he's cool with it, no gaurantee of course, can we let it go?

The problem is not the quality of the section or anything, it's the fact that it is speculation. I suggest you take a look at Wikipedia is not a crystal ball for more insight. I believe I've used up my three reverts for the page so I'll leave it to someone else. KramarDanIkabu [[User talk:KramarDanIkabu|(speak)]] 02:07, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dude it says right at the top that the whole article may have elements in it that are speuclative, and its in a section thats even more earmarked!!! Can't you let the guy have SOMETHING in here or does it all have to be your way?

I don't find speculation acceptable in any case unless it is widely accepted and hasn't been denied. I mean, anyone can say anything can come of Infinite Crisis, but unless you can prove that a lot of people agree on the possibility, I don't think it should be mentioned unless it can be worded to sound not so speculative. KramarDanIkabu [[User talk:KramarDanIkabu|(speak)]] 02:30, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NFL playoff seed templates and formatting

Actually, I was thinking about putting them into templates because I was the one who first put in those playoff seed tables in the first place... but I never got around to doing it. Thank you. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 01:02, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I wish I had known that before doing it. KramarDanIkabu 01:06, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I altered the way the format was to clear up the confusion that may have occured with simular items and added some information to that list. NoseNuggets 10:56 PM US EST 5 Jan 2006.

I understand why you are doing it, just as long as by the end of the playoffs the formats of every article should be the same (after all, I would like this encyclopedia to maintain consistency between similar articles). KramarDanIkabu 03:57, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you go **** yourself? NoseNuggets 10:59 PM US EST Jan 5 2005.

No need for profanity; I'm just trying to improve this encyclopedia to a more professional standard. KramarDanIkabu 03:59, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]