User talk:DriveMySol

Stop

Discuss the problem and wait for a consensus. If you continue to remove the content you will fast-track your way to another block-Regancy42 (talk) 10:40, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2010s. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Erzsébet Báthory_{(talk|contr.)} 12:25, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox geographic region

Template:Infobox geographic region has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Erzsébet Báthory_{(talk|contr.)} 14:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2010 in electro pop music

A tag has been placed on 2010 in electro pop music requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. iBen^discuss 01:54, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2010s in science and technology

The article 2010s in science and technology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

See WP:CRYSTAL. Wikipedia shouldn't predict the future.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gosox5555 (talk) 03:11, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

STOP - Generation pages

Please do not change the dates and introduction on the Generation X, Generation Y, and Generation Z pages. Dates were reached through a consensus. --CreativeSoul7981 (talk) 04:17, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures) please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Reconsider! 04:40, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Names of the Decade

Please read the debate prior to adding or removing any new items. Artx (talk) 05:11, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2000s_(decade)#Request_for_consensus_concerning:_Names_of_the_decade

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to 2010s. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. ╟─Treasury Tag►quaestor─╢ 22:14, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pop culture history, 1920-present

Sorry, but this article is a real mess. Is there a good reason I shouldn't nominate it for deletion? You're not using reliable sources, and it has no proper focus or definition. Fences&Windows 23:28, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't add non-free images, there's no fair use justification for such a general article. Fences&Windows 23:31, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hold on, I'm just starting the article. Don't abort it so fast. DriveMySol (talk) 23:38, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's unsalvagable. Please take a step back and look at what you're writing when you start articles. You're not basing them on sources, you're using whatever comes off the top of your head! Your enthusiasm is welcome, but you need to stop just throwing articles together. Fences&Windows 23:52, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of 2010s in urban music

I have nominated 2010s in urban music, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010s in urban music. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fences&Windows 23:45, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with 2010s in music. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Don't repeat this while a deletion debate is open. Fences&Windows 00:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:SwampOregon.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:SwampOregon.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Nymf _talk/contr. 12:31, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Generation Alpha

A tag has been placed on Generation Alpha, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 16:14, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Pop culture history, 1920-present

I have nominated Pop culture history, 1920-present, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pop culture history, 1920-present. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Nymf _talk/contr. 14:01, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]