Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Madhero88
Voice your opinion on this candidate (talk page) (1/4/1); Scheduled to end 11:11, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Nomination
Madhero88 (talk · contribs) – Here is my first attempt at nominating someone else for adminship. User:Madhero88 has been editing for nearly 3 years. During the three years he has created over 80 articles, participating in the DYKs and the Wikipedia:WikiProject Jordan. He has also adopted three other users. Although he got blocked once in January 2009 I still hope it isn't a surprise for him to be nominated for adminship. Minimac94 (talk) 11:28, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I really appreciate the nomination, and I thank User:Minimac94 for it, and I am honored to accept it, and become one of the great admins of Wikipedia MaenK.A.Talk 17:04, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- A:
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A:
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A:
General comments
- Links for Madhero88: Madhero88 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for Madhero88 can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Madhero88 before commenting.
Discussion
Support
- Support as the nominator. Minimac94 (talk) 19:38, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Oppose
- Oppose - You seem to have a penchant for Huggle mistakes. This coupled with my relative disdain for the overuse of Huggle, I'm going to be force to oppose for now. Wisdom89 (T / C) 19:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
- Everyone makes mistakes, but I can't support in good conscience an admin who accidentally restores vandalism twice in a day while using Huggle. If you return to full time editing for a while and show us that you won't make mistakes like that in the future, I would likely be ready to support. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 19:35, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose, I see some causes for concern regarding Huggle and copyright issues. Would also like to see some more experiences in varied capacities, including quality content work. Cirt (talk) 20:11, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Soap and lack of recent activity. The majority of activity within the last 2 months seems to be controversial, and I cannot support an admin with that in mind. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 20:11, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Neutral
- Neutral due to lack of evidence - I like to review the candidate's answers to the three standard questions as a minimum.--otherlleft 19:58, 7 February 2010 (UTC)