Jump to content

Talk:Variety show

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 18:32, 10 February 2010 (Signing comment by 97.124.247.98 - ""). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Vaudeville forerunner?

On Vaudeville, variety is identified as its predecessor (1860s-80s). Is that the forerunner of this or is it something else? Anyway, it needs to be mentioned here. Rigadoun 18:54, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's something else, but related. Basically, a very low form of a similar concept. We should do an article at variety theater. For some sense of it, see box house. - Jmabel | Talk 20:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move to "Variety show (television)"?

Although some (non-televised) stage variety shows are still put on (seasonally at holiday resorts, for example), the present article, apart from mentioning the derivation of the format, is exclusively about the variety show as a television genre. I would suggest, therefore, that "Variety show (television)" might be a less ambiguous title. -- Picapica 07:52, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I mostly agree with the above; I don't think we need two different articles, but we need to explain the history and that TV was picking up an existing format. Variety entertainment dates back at least to the 19th century. - Jmabel | Talk 18:13, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
BBC article that helps tie together live and TV variety shows. Also ties (non-TV) variety shows to TV game shows. - Jmabel | Talk 20:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Insert-Country-Name-Here's Got Talent?

And odd though, but do America's Got Talent and its international spin-offs count as variety shows?--RAult (talk) 22:04, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prairie Home Companion?

This radio variety show may deserve a brief mention in this article, as it is a long-running (radio) show which survived the decline in the format's popularity.

Also, might be helpful to expand the reasons for the format's decline, and perhaps mention cultural reasons for the format's continued popularity in some areas of the world - such as Latin America and parts of Asia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.124.247.98 (talk) 18:31, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]