Jump to content

Talk:Naruto Uzumaki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 142.26.194.190 (talk) at 21:33, 10 February 2010 (the plot overview needs editing). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconAnime and manga B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject iconGuild of Copy Editors
WikiProject iconThis article was copy edited by Scapler, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.

Merchandising

[1] and [2] are only ones I found about that. Im not sure what kind of merchandising we need to put.Tintor2 (talk) 9:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Requesting a lock to prevent Vandalism

I've been going over the older versions of the article and I've been noticing an increase in vandalism by new users and anonymous users. This article should be locked, only allowing established users to edit, to stop the vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SuperSaiyaMan (talkcontribs) 17:05, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of it is good faith edits though, mostly undone because many editors do not read the article before adding duplicate information. Scapler (talk) 21:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
On second thought, maybe that would be a good idea, per this version. which I just reverted. Scapler (talk) 02:51, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Protect it, just make sure to leave the talk page open to IPs, not all of us are vandals. 189.4.250.18 (talk) 00:07, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There is a lot of vandalism on this article, discovered today. Can someone correct it all? Zhane Masaki (talk) 18:07, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is "weird ass gay kid" on it. Benos. Obvious trolls are obvious. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.107.62.152 (talk) 10:48, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Naruto Four Tails picture

I think this artical should have a picture of naruto in his four tails state or transformation(I dont know which one). Beacause he usses it in serveral battles. Poohman0 (talk) 05:11, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Forget the 4-tails! Naruto's using the 6-tailed fox-cloak now that Pain's killed Hinata. 75.157.126.31 (talk) 03:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I dont think Hinata is dead and you are correct but the four tails pic is in color Poohman0 (talk) 04:16, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't we mention sage mode as well and the picture of hi min sage mode?Haseo445 (talk) 16:26, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Nine tails

we should add that naruto has broken one of the seals and allowing him to use all 9 tails, but that the fourth hokage (aka naruto's father) would appear in his conscience if 8 tails appeared.Haseo445 (talk) 15:50, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If we add that, we should add at least a few details on his battle with Pain and confrontation with Nagato to the plot summary. 142.26.133.248 (talk) 16:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Uh that's not what happened. First off, theres only ONE seal. Naruto was just getting angrier and angrier, thinking things were helpless and the fox was using his anger to unleash his power to free himself. At the eighth tail, Naruto had to physically remove the seal to get all nine tails, but that would kill him and unleash a fully reborn Kyubi. Minato appeared because it was a SAFEGUARD to keep the Kyubi from breaking free. (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:27, 19 June 2009 (UTC).[reply]
That, and it was a one-shot deal, so if Naruto gets that angry and desperate again, his father won't be there to stop him from freeing the Nine-Tails. 142.26.194.190 (talk) 21:32, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Face Lines

why the heck does he have lines on his face? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.17.60.152 (talk) 17:17, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The fox demon. 75.157.84.228 (talk) 01:11, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

o naruto uzumaki —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.80.173.69 (talk) 13:02, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

the plot overview needs editing

The plot overview is confusing. It's not even written in chronological order. Can someone fix this? Alphapeta (talk) 04:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    • I've tried. Someone kept reverting it because they don't like the way canon order follows. Calling it 'original research' thus inadmissable. SuperSaiyaMan (talk)
A lot of relevant things have happened to Naruto since he last met Itachi, and while I agree that chapter-by-chapter updates are not kosher, we should include his training with Fukasaku, fight with Pain and meeting with his father.
Two of the three are already mentioned (one more explicitly than the other), albeit not at the end of the section. In case that leads to a question of "why?", the Part II paragraph is organized by topic; first Akatsuki, then Sasuke. ~SnapperTo 04:36, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I see that now, but his meeting with his dad's ghost is still an important revelation for him, and what about his begging the Raikage not to order Sasuke's execution (probably trivial)? Although nothing's come of it as of yet, I get the feeling something big's gonna happen. 142.26.133.248 (talk) 21:09, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
His meeting with Minato did had a explicit change on his personality with the exception of being a bit happier. He only received a hint of how he can bring peace and had sealed the fox once again.Tintor2 (talk) 01:28, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Naruto pulled a fast one on Yamato and is headed to where Kakashi and Sai are, and where Sasuke and Sakura are... I wonder what his reaction to Sakura's apparent treachery will be? 142.26.194.190 (talk) 21:29, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]