Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romanticism and Revolution

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per original prod and prod2, this is an essay, not an encyclopedic article. Intrinsically WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. —ShadowRanger ^(talk|stalk) 16:03, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article contains numerous good sources which testify to the notability of the topic such as Romanticism, Revolution, and Language; Romance and Revolution: Shelley and the Politics of a Genre; The French Revolution and the English Poets; Anger, Revolution, and Romanticism. As there is abundant material of this sort, it seems a straightforward matter to summarise it in an encyclopedic way. Any deficiencies in the current draft may be remedied by ordinary editing in accordance with our policy and deletion would obviously be unhelpful in this. Colonel Warden (talk) 16:19, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete personal essay by someone who couldn't even spell Tintern Abbey correctly with a title so broad, it could never possibly hope to become an encyclopedia article (decent title though, i wonder if there's a notable book of this name. Worth nicking if not.)Bali ultimate (talk) 23:25, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]