Jump to content

Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Vote/Filiocht

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006 | Vote

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by KC. (talk | contribs) at 01:10, 9 January 2006 (→Support). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Filiocht

Now that it seems that the new ArbCom will be at least partly selected by the community, I've decided to unwithdraw. Filiocht | The kettle's on 14:59, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Given the uncertainty over the selection/election process, a state of affairs that effectively renders these candidacies meaningless, I have decided to withdraw for the moment. If and when clarity is restored, I may reverse this decision. Filiocht | The kettle's on 09:53, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've been around since about July 2003, one way or the other, and became an admin around the end of that year. Anyone with an interest in the more obscure corners of 20th century literature may have seen some of my edits.

I have no position on the performance of the existing ArbCom, and nothing I say should be taken as implicit criticism. I run on a simple platform. I would aim to follow the following basic principles:

  • Equality of respect: the same standards of behaviour should be extended to and expected of all users. Being an admin gives me no rights that are not also extended to non-admins, I deserve no more leeway than someone who has been here for 3 months. Of course, I exclude the real newcomers, who should never be bitten.
  • Talking is better than blocking, discussing is better than voting. In the last resort, blocking/banning is better than letting one person drain the time, energy and goodwill of the many.

Beyond these, I have no preconceptions and would expect to grow into the role according to the needs of Wikipedia. Filiocht | The kettle's on 14:42, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Questions


Support

  1. --Sean|Black 00:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support. Antandrus (talk) 00:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Michael Snow 00:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. – ugen64 00:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. —Kirill Lokshin 00:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Jaranda wat's sup 00:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support. – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 00:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support - Mackensen (talk) 00:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support. --GraemeL (talk) 00:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support. Couldn't agree more with your Basic Principles. Batmanand 00:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Need more like him. Dmcdevit·t 00:30, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support. A reasonable, pleasant, helpful editor with good judgement. --NicholasTurnbull | (talk) 00:44, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Haukur 00:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 00:53, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Strong support. The best. Ambi 00:53, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support he's a good one. --Angelo 00:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. JYolkowski // talk 01:01, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support - eminently sensible and level headed - I believe Filiocht would make an excellent artbitrator. Worldtraveller 01:02, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support -- Dragonfiend 01:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Tony Sidaway|Talk 01:05, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Shanes 01:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. KC. 01:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

  1. Zach (Smack Back) Fair use policy 00:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose questions. David | explanation | Talk 00:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose, questions. See my voting rationale. Talrias (t | e | c) 00:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_January_2006/Vote/Filiocht&oldid=34433095"