Talk:Semi-periphery countries/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SilkTork *^YES! 14:18, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

I'll take a look sometime in the next seven days and then leave some initial comments. SilkTork *^YES! 14:18, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will make some initial comments as I read through, and then summarise. SilkTork *^YES! 16:15, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prose is clear and readable and conveys often complex and difficult ideas in a lucid manner. There isn't too much reliance on WP:Jargon, though the terms periphery and core are used in the lead without explanation. A quick definition of those terms would be helpful - a link to their respective articles would be for those who wished to know more detail than a simple definition. SilkTork *^YES! 16:15, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]