Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Mountain
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by One bot (talk | contribs) at 04:30, 17 February 2010 (Removing Category:Relisted AfD debates). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kevin (talk) 04:21, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Danny Mountain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable porn actor. Fails WP:PORNBIO. ttonyb (talk) 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment AVN shows that he was nominated for 2010 Best Threeway Sex Scene for The A.J. Bailey Experiment. Ash (talk) 15:48, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment – Unless he "has received nominations for well-known awards in multiple years", he still fails WP:PORNBIO. ttonyb (talk) 16:13, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, I was confirming the fact of the award nomination. I think WP:PORNBIO is a better shortcut if you want to highlight the relevant criteria. Ash (talk) 16:22, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment – Unless he "has received nominations for well-known awards in multiple years", he still fails WP:PORNBIO. ttonyb (talk) 16:13, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails PORNBIO. He may become notable later. Morbidthoughts (talk) 20:32, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:21, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.