Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/ChildofMidnight/Evidence
|
Main case page (Talk) — Evidence (Talk) — Workshop (Talk) — Proposed decision (Talk) Case clerks: Tiptoety (Talk) & Amorymeltzer (Talk) Drafting arbitrator: Coren (Talk) |
| Wikipedia Arbitration |
|---|
 |
|
|
| Track related changes |
 | Create your own section to provide evidence in, and do not edit anyone else's section. Keep your evidence to a maximum of 1000 words and 100 diffs. Evidence longer than this will be refactored or removed entirely. |
Anyone, whether directly involved or not, may add evidence to this page. Create your own section and do not edit in anybody else's section. Please limit your main evidence to a maximum 1000 words and 100 diffs and keep responses to other evidence as short as possible. A short, concise presentation will be more effective; posting evidence longer than 1000 words will not help you make your point. Over-long evidence that is not exceptionally easy to understand (like tables) will be trimmed to size or, in extreme cases, simply removed by the Clerks without warning - this could result in your important points being lost, so don't let it happen. Stay focused on the issues raised in the initial statements and on diffs which illustrate relevant behavior.
It is extremely important that you use the prescribed format. Submitted evidence should include a link to the actual page diff in question, or to a short page section; links to the page itself are insufficient. Never link to a page history, an editor's contributions, or a log for all actions of an editor (as those will have changed by the time people click on your links), although a link to a log for a specific article or a specific block log can be useful. Please make sure any page section links are permanent. See simple diff and link guide.
This page is not for general discussion - for that, see the talk page. If you think another editor's evidence is a misrepresentation of the facts, cite the evidence and explain how it is incorrect within your own section. Please do not try to re-factor the page or remove evidence presented by others. If something is put in the wrong place, leave it for the Arbitrators or Clerks to move.
Arbitrators may analyze evidence and other assertions at /Workshop. /Workshop provides for comment by parties and others as well as Arbitrators. After arriving at proposed principles, findings of fact or remedies, Arbitrators vote at /Proposed decision. Only Arbitrators (and clerks, when clarification on votes is needed) may edit the proposed decision page.
Evidence presented by Ryan Postlethwaite
Attacks and "unsourced" accusations against other editors
General defamation of other contributors not specified
Previous Arbitration findings against ChildofMidnight
Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Obama articles#ChildofMidnight - ChildofMidnight was found to have deleted and refactored others parties comments and engaged in attacking other editors. He was also found to have edit warred and templated other editors.
Previous Arbitration remedies against ChildofMidnight
Problematic edits to global warming related talk pages (both article and user talk)
Taken from Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation/Requests for enforcement.
- from Talk:Global warming
Unproductive discussion, repeats ad nauseum issues without source and substantial reasons, WP:FORUM - I'm sure our admin elite will sort this mess out in no time once they're made aware of it and have a chance to review the evidence of BozMo's foul play."
Civility, disparaging sardonic demeanor. - "...involvement has been very disruptive and his enforcements have only gone after one "side""
Battleground menality. - "swan song of an incompetent and dishonest admin to me ... So you join an elite club of abusive admins who act improperly"
Unwilling to conduct RFC/U, responds with personal attacks - "doesn't change the fact that your involvement has been grotesquely biased and damaging."
See previous.Note: Additional Diffs provided in context below. They are numbered.
Warnings received for global warming topic conduct
Taken from Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation/Requests for enforcement.
- Forum warning by 2over0 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- Name calling warning by 2over0
- Civility warning by 2over0
- Civility and bad faith block warning by BozMo (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- Probation warning by 2over0
Evidence presented by {your user name}
{Write your assertion here}
Place argument and diffs which support your assertion; for example, your first assertion might be "So-and-so engages in edit warring", which should be the title of this section. Here you would show specific edits to specific articles which show So-and-so engaging in edit warring.
{Write your assertion here}
Place argument and diffs which support the second assertion; for example, your second assertion might be "So-and-so makes personal attacks", which should be the title of this section. Here you would show specific edits where So-and-so made personal attacks.
Evidence presented by {your user name}
before using the last evidence template, please make a copy for the next person
{Write your assertion here}
Place argument and diffs which support your assertion; for example, your first assertion might be "So-and-so engages in edit warring", which should be the title of this section. Here you would show specific edits to specific articles which show So-and-so engaging in edit warring.
{Write your assertion here}
Place argument and diffs which support the second assertion; for example, your second assertion might be "So-and-so makes personal attacks", which should be the title of this section. Here you would show specific edits where So-and-so made personal attacks.