Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ciklum (2nd nomination)

Ciklum

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Ciklum
• Articles for deletion/Ciklum (2nd nomination)

Ciklum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted, immediately re-created by the same WP:SPA, Ciklum (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Claim to notability is a placing in a list by Red Herring magazine, which is currently unverifiable as the pages are 404. Almost entirely the work of an agent of the company. Sources are largely not independent (i.e. repeats of press releases). Needs deletion or a complete rewrite with new sources, IMO. Guy (Help!) 23:15, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, no notability. Haakon (talk) 20:59, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
• Was the version kept in the first afd any better than the current? —Korath (Talk) 01:08, 1 March 2010 (UTC)