User talk:Evangeline

Welcome!

Hello Evangeline, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ^Blank ^Verse 16:05, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thanks for your work at LIP (clockwork factory)! Your translation of the sentence concerning Neuschwander & Riboud is correct (but I couldn't find where was that sentence in the article). Cheers! Tazmaniacs (talk)

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Owen Roe O'Sullivan has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. DougsTech (talk) 20:13, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to note that DougsTech erased the whole article by mistake without realizing it was correct and comprehensive, with lots of references, just written by a newbie! He reinstated it and apologized once this was pointed out.

Evangeline (talk)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:54, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Owen Roe O'Sullivan Rating

The article is indeed past Stub-class but is not yet past Start-class, the biography should have sections. It would be helpful if a works sectioned with a list of notable poems followed before the references. The material is good, but the format just needs some tweaking. If you would like some more specific help re editing, drop me a note. EraserGirl (talk) 10:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article from German Wikipedia

I note from your user boxes that you translate from the German to English Wikipedia. Have you looked at the Marxian economics article in German? It is probably too much to hope for that you have actually translated the article, but perhaps you could comment on the ME talk page as to whether there anything that we might benefit from including in the English article? Sunray 16:58, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied on user:sunray's talk page Alan XAX Freeman 08:23, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In turn, I've responded on my talk page. I think your ideas have merit and would suggest that we introduce them on the ME talk page. Toward that end, I will respond to Ryan's general observations about the organization of the ME article. Sunray 07:09, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your further thoughts on this subject seem apt. I would make sense to me to introduce the subject on the ME page. BTW I greatly appreciated the information you provided about what seems to be some sort of ethnographic link between those two musical cultures. This seems to me to be a discovery of the order of that of the Bering land bridge. Sunray 22:20, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Translation

- Hi, I could use some help translating this piece in order to gain useful information for an article about a German mountaineer (Ludwig Vörg). I understand it to mean that they could not move the body from where it fell/temporary grave. Is this true? The text is below.

"Ludwig Vörg konnte im Rahmen unserer Umbettungsarbeiten nicht geborgen werden.

Die vorgesehene Überführung zum Sammelfriedhof in Przemysl - Sammelfriedhof (Polen) war somit leider nicht möglich. Sein Name wird im Gedenkbuch des Friedhofes verzeichnet.

Falls der Obengenannte mit Ihnen verwandt ist, und Sie von uns über Sachstandsänderungen informiert werden möchten, füllen Sie bitte das folgende Formular aus. Wir legen dann einen Vorgang an, um Sie somit über Neuigkeiten unterrichten zu können. Bitte prüfen Sie vorher an Hand Ihrer Unterlagen sorgfältig, ob es sich wirklich um Ihren Angehörigen handelt. Falls Sie nicht sicher sind, vermerken Sie dies im Textfeld des Formulares.

Der Volksbund Deutsche Kriegsgräberfürsorge sorgt für die Ruhestätten der im Ersten und Zweiten Weltkrieg ums Leben gekommenen deutschen Soldaten. Der Volksbund errichtete bisher über 820 Kriegsgräberstätten in 45 Staaten, auf denen etwa zwei Millionen Kriegstote ruhen. Bau und Pflege dieser Friedhöfe wurden nur möglich durch Spenden der Förderer dieser humanitären Arbeit sowie"

Many Thanks Poolofthought (talk) 01:46, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Traduction

Salut,
J'ai contribué à l'écriture de l'article fr:Bataille de Latroun (1948) et j'ai commencé sa traduction vers Battle of Latrun mais je n'y arrive vraiment pas. De l'anglais vers le français, je m'en tire très bien mais je ne parviens pas à traduire les nuances du français vers l'anglais... Pourrais-tu m'aider ?
Merci, Ceedjee (talk) 17:24, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Evengeline,

Thank you for your answer !

If you just fear for neutrality, I can help because I read English very well. I just have a problem to translate nuances.

This article is a FA (Featured Article) in French and has been recognized as such, so no problem of neutrality.

Anyway, thank you for your answer :-)

Ceedjee (talk) 06:23, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article on Manichaeism

I added a brief description of the beliefs to the introduction, what do you think?:

"Manichaeism is distinguished by its eleborate cosmology describing the struggle between a good, spiritual world of light, and an evil, material world of darkness. Through an ongoing process which takes place in human history, light is gradually removed from the world of matter and returned to the world of light from which it came."Jimhoward72 (talk) 07:34, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that's great! That was what I thought M'ism was but couldn't figure out from the article! (But sp should be "elAborate.") Evangeline (talk) 02:43, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi Evangeline! Thanks for your very nice comment on my subpage nl:Gebruiker:Guss/commentaar uit andere wikipedia's. I'm glad you like my pages on Chinese history. If you think of any other pages to translate into English, please let me know. Always glad if I can help. Guss2 (talk) 08:12, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Medellín

You're doing a great job - I'm going to stay out of your way for a while to avoid edit conflicts (hate those!). There is some information at the article on es:Medellín which could be added later, and the layout could certainly be improved, but the text is (as ever) the most important thing. pablo_hablo. 21:34, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pablo, thanks. I'm sort of new here but I thought Medellín was too important a place to have incorrect English in its article. I don't know much about layout at all, sorry if it's wrong. Evangeline (talk) 04:42, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not wrong - and anyway I wasn't criticising you (nothing to do with the text, just the way the images are all plonked on the right!) pablo_hablo. 05:41, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Top job on Medellín! Have a beer. pablo_hablo. 09:32, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

p.s. I have shifted your userboxes so that they align on the right (they kept moviing around when you resize the browser window), please revert if this was an unwelcome change. pablo_hablo.

Cavale Media and popups

This is totally unrelated to the COIN post you made but, if popups are annoying you I'd recommend downloading Mozilla Firefox and the add-on "Adblock Plus" I haven't seen a pop-up in ages! If you can find some news sources criticising the company by all means add some criticism too. (I'm not sure why this is in orange!) Smartse (talk) 18:51, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ailbe

That's looking much tidier and reading more cleanly - thanks! I'm not sure I like to rely on answers.com for references (they often just copy wikipedia articles) but I'll take a more detailed look tonight and see what can be pulled out from there. --ClickRick (talk) 10:46, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

German translation question

Hey -- how would you translate Die kleine Studentin -- it's the title of an operetta written in 1926. I want to translate the title accurately but in a way that conveniently makes it clear that the noun is feminine. So far I'm just translating it as "The Schoolgirl," but would "The Little Co-ed" or "The Co-ed" or "The College Co-ed" or "The Pretty Little Student" or "The Pretty Student" or "The Pretty Undergrad" or "The Little Undergrad" or "Undergrad Girl" or something else be better and more accurate? Thanks in advance. UPDATE: Maybe "College Girl" would cover all bases? Softlavender (talk) 08:29, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is the girl in the story a schoolgirl (which means under 18, on the whole) or a university student? The "kleine" in German here really means "pretty" or "darling," effectively. I might use "The Little Coed" --accurate, but old-fashioned ("coed" is an obsolete word)-- but then the operetta itself is old-fashioned. Your suggestions "The college girl" and "The pretty undergrad" are also good ones. Evangeline (talk) 05:35, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Casale Media

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Casale Media. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casale Media (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Lily Collins

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Lily Collins. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lily Collins. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article mentions that she was on the season finale of 90210, but doesn't specify what season. Can you add that? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 00:53, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Final result: article was not deleted. Evangeline (talk) 07:56, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SUL

I would like to usurp the Swedish wiki's sv:Användare:Evangeline; it looks as if that user has a single edit last July. I am using the Evangeline.en just for usurpation. Thanks! Evangeline (talk) 09:56, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo WikiDE! Wie gesagt...ich bestätige, dass ich de:Benutzer:Evangeline übernehmen möchte. Ich benutze "Evangeline.en" nur zum Übernehmen. Vielen Dank! Evangeline (talk) 07:10, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

管理员祝你們好! 我希望 "奪取" 中文维基用户帐户 User:Evangeline. 看來这位用户無貢獻; 可是我也許算錯了. 谢谢你們幫忙. 请包涵我的中文不好. 新年快樂! Evangeline (talk) 04:19, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Wikiens français! Je souhaite unifier mes comptes globales et pour cela je demande l'usurpation du compte Utilisateur:Evangeline, qui ne semble pas avoir des contributions depuis l'enregistrement du nom. En fait, je pense que cet utilisateur est probablement moi-même car j'habitais en France au moment de l'enregistrement, mais si c'est le cas, je n'ai plus le mot de passe. Merci de votre aide! Evangeline (talk) 04:54, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

¡Hola Wiki ES! Para unificar mis cuentas globales, quería prender el nombre del usuario Evangeline que parece haber contribuido dos veces desde la inscripción. Gracias por su ayuda! Evangeline.en (talk) 05:18, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done@eswiki. Regards, --Dferg (talk) 19:35, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hei Norske Wikifolk! I am en:User:Evangeline from the English Wiki since 2004, with the global account Evangeline. I am trying to unify my global account. I see that the Bruker:Evangeline seems to have only one edit, almost two years ago, and no recent activity. There is no User Page or Talk Page. I would like to usurp this name if possible. I am sorry not to use the template but the links did not work properly for me. Mange takk, og Godt Nytt År! Evangeline.en (talk) 06:12, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Haros (talk) 08:59, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wiktionary, This is my SUL request section. (I am using the Username Evangeline.en only for usurpation of the name Evangeline.) Thanks! Evangeline.en (talk) 07:19, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Salut, c'est bon, mais comme indiqué il faudra faire l'unification depuis tes préférences ici (pour peux que le mot de passe et l'adresse email que tu avais pris pour evangeline.en soit les mêmes qu'ici). Popo le Chien ^{throw a bone} 09:10, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Je l'ai fait deja mais comme j'ai dit, il reste encore des comptes ou Evangeline est une autre, dont le francais. Est-ce que j'ai autre chose a faire? Merci! Evangeline (talk) 03:11, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

USURP@pl.wiki

Your USURP request has been done. Happy editing :) Masti (talk) 10:05, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

USURP@zh.wiki

Your USURP request has been done. Best regards.--Mywood (talk) 08:51, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Twenty-Four Histories

Would like to expand all the articles on Twenty-Four Histories?I can give suggestion about the meaning of some Chinese characters and sentences. Gisbrother (talk) 08:25, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That would be fun. I think we might work well together since you seem very literate about Chinese literature/history, and I can help with the translations and English. Evangeline (talk) 19:25, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

《史记》的缺失与增补是《史记》研究史上重大疑案中最为突出的两个问题，两千多年来学者们多有争论。 What I want to say divided to two part.One is the missing of some chapter of shiji then scholars added chapters( as the style of Sima Qian wrote) to shiji,histaus for 缺失,supplement for 增补.

班彪在其续《史记》的《后记略论》中提出 :“太史令司马迁作本纪、世家、列传、书、表凡百三十篇 ,而十篇缺焉。《汉书》:“十篇缺，有录无书”。其篇目则多从魏人张晏,《史记》全文一百三十篇，自司马迁殁就有十篇散失。西汉博士褚少孙补之。但其中有些也有可能更有后人补之，如《孝武本纪》摘抄于《封禅书》，褚少孙虽才识不足也不至于如此。另有唐司马贞补《三皇本纪》。 In Book of the later Han write about Ban Biao (班彪) His 略论(brief talk/conclusion on shiji in afterwords)said "Sima Qian wrote Benji,Shijia,Liezhuan,Shu and Biao,a sum of 130 chapters,but now 10 chapter have missing".Ban Biao dont list the titles of the 10 chapters,Zhang Yan(张晏) list the title,景纪,武纪,礼书,乐书,兵书,将相年表,日者传,三王世家,龟策传,傅靳列传.Chu Shaosun(褚少孙)add supplement to shiji.

the other is some scholars consider that Sima Tan wrote draft of shiji. 易宁、易平，《北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 2004年01期，北京师范大学史学理论与史学史研究中心、史学研究所，南昌大学古籍研究所

司马谈作史,初唐时提起,之前并无此说。此后直到清代以前,学者只凭想当然,予以断定。清人方苞、俞正燮等根据对《太史公自序》的理解,从《史记》中寻找司马谈遗文,开考证之先河。王国维根据《刺客列传》等三篇的赞中提到公孙季功、董生、他广、平原君子俱与“余”有交往,而此数人行辈“远在司马迁之前”,推测文中的“余”是司马谈。以顾颉刚为代表,后世学者据此认定司马谈作史,并不断推衍,持论也更加肯定。其实,此说立论的文献依据有问题:其一,《太史公自序》“请悉论先人所次旧闻”,其中的“先人”所指并非司马谈,而是世为史官的司马氏先祖和孔子。其二,“卒述陶唐以来至于麟止”,只能是司马氏先祖和孔子“所次旧闻”,并非司马

赖长扬史学研究1981年02期顾颉刚先生《司马谈作史考》,曾考定《刺客列传》、《郦生陆贾列传》,《樊郦滕灌列传》等篇“成于谈手无疑”。①并推断:“谈之为史,有传有赞,《史记》体例创定于谈亦可知”。