Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avalon High (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Big Bird (talk | contribs) at 21:55, 10 March 2010 (Avalon High (film): comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Avalon High (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFF. Not even cast, much less begun filming. WP:CRYSTAL. —Kww(talk) 15:57, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Disney announced seven days ago their intention to add "six new movies and three series to air over the next two years", Avalon High being one of those six new films. This announcement is by no means sufficient to confer upon the subject enough notability for inclusion on Wikipedia. For now, delete per WP:NFF because the film has not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography and should not have its own article until such a time that this can be confirmed. No prejudice towards recreation should the film one day meet the necessary notability requirements. Big Bird (talkcontribs) 16:06, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Completely agree on Den Brother being added. No release date, no cast, no filming has started. Can't say I agree with Phineas and Ferb: Across the Second Dimension being lumped in, because it does have a cast and it does have a specific release date. ~ Baron Von Yiffington . talk . contribs 21:47, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article could say the release date is tomorrow but that's irrelevant because Disney did not make this announcement to Wikipedia. What's relevant is that reliable sources (Hollywood Reporter, Variety, WorldScreen and others) report only that the projects have been announced. There is no confirmation of production commencement nor release date, whatever's in the article is unverified and likely incorrect. Big Bird (talkcontribs) 21:55, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]