Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iamsaa

Iamsaa

Iamsaa (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iamsaa/Archive.

Report date March 16 2010, 09:48 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

• Serfrosh (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Evidence submitted by Esowteric

Created within an hour of the creation of sock Newatwp (talk · contribs) who was indefinitely blocked on 15 March 2010 at AN/I. AN/I thread.

Only contribution thus far is to comment at the RS noticeboard about a "reliable souce" proposed by another sock: edit diff.

Final offer of help: Please note that Scientizzle (talk · contribs) has made a final offer of help to the sockmaster Iamsaa (talk · contribs), if he logs in with that account, agrees to abide by rules and is willing to discuss matters. See talk page offer.

Thanks, Esowteric+Talk 09:48, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Update: OK, I can see that Iamsaa is negotiating to be unblocked. See here. The accounts were created on the 12th, so this should not prejudice current negotiations. Esowteric+Talk 09:58, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Hm? He was also creating new accounts on the 14th; and as far as current negotiation is concerned, he's still claiming not to be (among others) User:Falconkhe. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 20:24, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

I know... *eye roll* I've asked point-blank about this account. I'd like to see a checkuser report on this account if there's a further denial. The "negotiation" is one last suuuuper long-shot to get through to this person and stop the disruption. We'll see... — Scientizzle 20:47, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Actually...can I assume, based on your block, jpgordon, that there was a check performed? The behavioral evidence is mind-numbingly obvious, so I was planning on blocking anyway. — Scientizzle 20:50, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Just block, ignore and move on and continue to block all socks. Checkuser is no longer required, new accounts are quacking like ducks. Off2riorob (talk) 20:51, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

And I'm quite happy to keep running checks until he quits. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 21:06, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Good work, many thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 21:11, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

This case has been marked as closed. It will be archived after its final review by a Clerk or Checkuser.

---