Jump to content

Human genetic engineering

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Xulong (talk | contribs) at 02:18, 17 March 2010 (In popular culture). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Human genetic engineering is the modification of an individual's genotype with the aim of choosing the phenotype of a newborn or changing the existing phenotype of a child or adult.[1] It holds the promise of curing genetic diseases like cystic fibrosis, and increasing the immunity of people to viruses. It is speculated that genetic engineering could be used to change physical appearance, metabolism, and even improve mental faculties like memory and intelligence, although for now these uses are limited to science fiction.

Background

Researchers are currently trying to map out and assign genes to different body functions and diseases. Once the genes responsible for a disease are found, theoretically gene therapy should be able to permanently cure the disease. Interactions between genes and gene regulators are complex and many of these interactions are currently unknown.

History

The first gene therapy trials on humans began in 1990 on patients with Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID). In 2000, the first gene therapy "success" resulted in SCID patients with a functional immune system. These trials were stopped when it was discovered that two of ten patients in one trial had developed leukemia resulting from the insertion of the gene-carrying retrovirus near an oncogene. In 2007, four of the ten patients had developed leukemia [2]. Work is now focusing on correcting the gene without triggering an oncogene.

Trial treatments of SCID have been gene therapy's only success; since 1999, gene therapy has restored the immune systems of at least 17 children with two forms (ADA-SCID and X-SCID) of the disorder.

Human genetic engineering is already being used on a small scale to allow infertile women with genetic defects in their mitochondria to have children.[3] Healthy human eggs from a second mother are used. The child produced this way has genetic information from two mothers and one father.[3] The changes made are germline changes and will likely be passed down from generation to generation, and, thus, are a permanent change to the human genome.[3]

Other forms of human genetic engineering are still theoretical. Recombinant DNA research is usually performed to study gene expression and various human diseases. Some drastic demonstrations of gene modification have been made with mice and other animals, however, testing on humans is generally considered off-limits. In some instances changes are usually brought about by removing genetic material from one organism and transferring them into another species.

Methods

Somatic

Somatic genetic engineering involves adding genes to cells other than egg or sperm cells. For example, if a person had a disease caused by a defective gene, a healthy gene could be added to the affected cells to treat the disorder. As of now, this is likely to take the form of gene therapy. The distinguishing characteristic of somatic engineering is that it is non-inheritable, i.e. the new gene would not be passed to the recipient’s offspring.

There are two techniques researchers are currently experimenting with:

  • Viruses are good at injecting their DNA payload into human cells and reproducing it. By adding the desired DNA to the DNA of non-pathogenic virus, a small amount of virus will reproduce the desired DNA and spread it all over the body.
  • Manufacture large quantities of DNA, and somehow package it to induce the target cells to accept it, either as an addition to one of the original 23 chromosomes, or as an independent 24th human artificial chromosome.

Germline

Germline engineering involves changing genes in eggs, sperm, or very early embryos. This type of engineering is inheritable, meaning that the modified genes would appear not only in any children that resulted from the procedure, but in all succeeding generations. Germline engineering is controversial due to the ability to change the very underlying nature of humanity in fundamental ways according simply to personal values of the individuals undergoing or performing the change on their children. Genetic engineering of humans has been received badly throughout the scientific community due to a negative history of eugenics in the early and mid 20th century. It is used in many present-day hospitals.

Uses

There are two types of human genetic engineering, negative and positive. The former removes genetic disorders and the latter enhances.

Negative genetic engineering (cures and treatments)

When treating problems that arise from genetic disorder, one solution is gene therapy, also known as negative genetic engineering. A genetic disorder is a condition caused by the genetic code of the individual, such as spina bifida or autism.[4] When this happens, genes may be expressed in unfavorable ways or not at all, and this generally leads to further complications.

The idea of gene therapy is that a non-pathogenic virus or other delivery systems can be used to insert into DNA—a good copy of the gene—into cells of the living individual. The modified cells would divide as normal and each division would produce cells that express the desired trait. The result would be that he/she would then have the ability to express the trait that was previously absent, at least partially. This form of genetic engineering could help alleviate many problems, such as diabetes, cystic fibrosis, or other genetic diseases.

Positive genetic engineering (enhancement)

The potential of genetic engineering to cure medical conditions opens the question of exactly what such a condition is. Some view aging and death as medical conditions and therefore potential targets for engineering solutions. They see human genetic engineering potentially as a key tool in this (see life extension). The difference between cure and enhancement from this perspective is merely one of degree. Theoretically genetic engineering could be used to drastically change people's genomes, which could enable people to regrow limbs and other organs, perhaps even extremely complex ones such as the spine.

It could also be used to make people stronger, faster, smarter, or to increase the capacity of the lungs, among other things. If a gene exists in nature, it could be brought over to a human cell. In this view, there is no qualitative difference (only a quantitative one) between, for instance, a genetic intervention to cure muscular atrophy, and a genetic intervention to improve muscle function even when those muscles are functioning at or around the human average (since there is also an average muscle function for those with a particular type of dystrophy, which the treatment would improve upon).

Others feel that there is an important distinction between using genetic technologies to treat those who are suffering and to make those who are already healthy superior to the average. Though theory and speculation suggest that genetic engineering could be used to make people stronger, faster, smarter, or to increase lung capacity, the AAAS report finds that there is little evidence that this can currently be done without very unsafe and therefore unethical human experiments. Because different cells have different tasks, changing one cell to do a different job will not only affect that one task, it can affect many others too.

Controversy

Ethics

The genetic engineering of humans has raised many controversial ethical issues. While negative genetic engineering (gene therapy) does indeed raise a debate, the use of genetic engineering for human enhancement arouses the strongest feelings on both sides.[5]

Genetic engineering is tested on animals, often including primates. Some animal rights activists find this inhumane.[6]

Genetic modification of embryos can pose an ethical question about the rights of the baby. One belief is that every fetus should be free to not be genetically modified. Others believe that parents hold the rights to change their unborn children.[7] Still others believe that every child should have the right to be born free from preventable diseases.

Molecular Biologist Lee M. Silver believes that unlike Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, where a totalitarian government controls all of the genetic enhancements (they actually use eugenics instead of direct genetic modification) in society, the use of gene therapy to design children will be spread through what he calls “free market eugenics” (Silver 315). Wealthy families will opt to design their child with genetic advantages because other families are doing so, and everybody wants to provide their newborn child with the best opportunities in life, with a leg up on the competition.

The greatest fear for Silver is that we will design so many children with germline gene therapy, that the families wealthy enough to design their children, will pass down these enhanced traits to future generations. This gene therapy will obviously cost money, and the less wealthy families will be left to procreate naturally, and introduce their children into the world disadvantaged from their first breath.

The impact on society will be a new alignment of classes, no longer will we separate people by their ethnic differences, the new division will be between what Silver calls ‘the naturals’ and ‘the GenRich’, or genetically enhanced. The major worry here is that the ‘genetic gulf’ between these two classes will become so wide that humans will become separate species (Silver 313).

  • Maximum Ride series by James Patterson: The main characters are six human children who had bird DNA injected into them when they were in their mothers' wombs. Because of this, they all have wings and can fly, along with their own individual special abilities. Max is the leader and apparently the one who will save the world, as she was told by the labcoats, people who made them. They're trying to evade Erasers, with wolf DNA who want to kill them, and save the world by bringing attention to the issue of global warming. But many obstacles lie in their way...
  • Mobile Suit Gundam SEED (anime): Set in a world in which genetically modified humans, termed 'Coordinators', have been ostracized and isolated from unmodified humans, termed 'Naturals'. Due to extreme differences in mental and physical abilities between the two groups, racial, economic, and political issues have arisen, culminating in war. Gundam Seed addresses such concerns as animosity caused by the jealousy of Naturals over Coordinator abilities, both groups looking down on one another as being lesser life forms, and genocidal factions emerging on both sides. The series primarily explores these issues from the point of view of a Coordinator protagonist who finds himself fighting on the side of the Naturals, as his childhood friend has become a member of the Coordinator military, giving a perspective on both sides of the conflict.
  • Trigun (anime): Two genetically enhanced brothers fight against each other to save or destroy a colony of humans on a new planet. One brother sees humans as inferior and wants to erase them and the other sees the humans as equals and wants to save them.
  • Gattaca (film): Presents a biopunk vision of a society driven by new eugenics. Children of the middle and upper classes are selected through preimplantation genetic diagnosis to ensure they possess the best hereditary traits of their parents.
  • Bioshock (Video Game): The main enemies the player encounters over the course of the game are known as splicers. So called for their genetic manipulation, or gene splicing. In the game a compound called ADAM is responsible for the genetic manipulation. The compound is harvested from a species of sea slugs, it acts like a seemingly benign form of cancer, destroying native cells and replacing them with the unstable stem versions.
  • Old Man's War series by John Scalzi: To create an army of soldiers capable of defending the human race from endless alien hordes the Colonial Defense Forces recruits 75 year olds and gives them new younger bodies capable of super human feats.
  • Batman Beyond: In the episode Splicers and making appearances later in the series, a new fad of splicing animal genes for cosmetic and enhancement purposes makes the teen scene. When research shows that splicing increases aggression in users, resulting it being banned in Gotham, only finding a place in the criminal underworld later. Notable Splicers are Woof of the Jokerz (spliced with hyena DNA), and the Zander (spliced with T-Rex DNA), leader of KOBRA.
  • Halo (series) (Video Game): the protagonist and several other characters in the Halo universe known as Spartans have all gone through comprehensive genetic augmentation, making them almost super human. The augmentations vary from Muscular Enhancement Injections to a Catalytic Thyroid Implant. The effects include nearly unbreakable bones, increased reflexes and increased muscle tissue with increased density. The SPARTAN-III program also included a mutagen that increased aggression and injury tolerance.
  • Deus Ex: The protagonists of both games in the series are genetically modified by injections called nano-augs (Deus Ex) and bio mods (Invisible War). These nanite injections alter the host's genes to enhance them with new skill that would help them through different obstacles in the game. Both the protagonists and antagonists are bio-modified along with other support characters and neutral characters. (Note: In this game, the "good guys" and the "bad guys" are completely interchangeable because of the players personal choice)

See also

References

  1. ^ Singer, Peter; Kuhese, Helga, Bioethics: An Anthology.
  2. ^ Press release from the European Society of Gene Therapy
  3. ^ a b c "BBC News". news.bbc.co.uk. 2001-05-04. Retrieved 2008-04-26. {{cite web}}: Text "Genetically altered babies born" ignored (help); Text "SCI/TECH" ignored (help)
  4. ^ "Yahoo Education: Definition of genetic disorder". Retrieved 2008-03-26.
  5. ^ Glover, Jonathan (1984). What Sort of People Should There Be?. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  6. ^ Dresser, Rebecca. "Designing Babies: Human Research Issues." IRB: Ethics & Human Research 26.5 (Sep. 2004): 1-8.
  7. ^ Resnik, David B., and Daniel B. Vorhaus. "Genetic modification and genetic determinism." Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine (2006): 1-11.

8. Sandel, Michael J. The Case Against Perfection. Michael J. Sandel, 2007.