Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crash TV

Crash TV

Disputed prod; "references" tag removed without provision of references or explanation. This is either a protologism without reliable sources or original research by synthesis; my limited research can't find anything to substantiate the claims for the existence of this term and it may even be a hoax. Accounting4Taste:talk 04:48, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, unnotable neologisim. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:40, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. IRK!_{Leave me a note or two} 07:24, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

d per above Carter | Talk to me 11:51, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The earlier comments said it best (and first). There should be a separate AfD section for professional wrestling articles, no? Seems like there's a glut of them around here. Ecoleetage (talk) 18:05, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment/neutral We should probably get some verification from Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling to see if they know anything of the subject. The article is obviously poorly written and has no sources, but it may just need a clean-up. IRK!_{Leave me a note or two} 22:42, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, even if this term does exist, it isn't notable enough for an article of its own...so delete unless someone can prove it exists with a reliable source. If it does exist, then I think it should be merged and redirected to the List of professional wrestling slang. Nikki311 04:50, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete , Fails notability and completely unreferenced. Artene50 (talk) 05:20, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am aware of wrestling websites calling certain events "Crash TV", but this article is nothing but OR. Darrenhusted (talk) 08:58, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]