Affordable Care Act
Long title | An act entitled The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. |
---|---|
Enacted by | the 111th United States Congress |
Legislative history | |
| |
Major amendments | |
Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act |
This article is part of a series on |
Healthcare reform in the United States |
---|
United States portal Health care portal |
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (H.R. 3590) is legislation enacted by the 111th United States Congress and awaiting President Barack Obama's signature on March 23, 2010. Along with the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act of 2010, the act forms the vehicle of the Democratic-controlled Congress's and Obama administration's health care reform agenda.
The bill was originally drafted by the Senate, as an alternative to the United States House of Representatives preferred health reform bill Affordable Health Care for America Act, which was passed by the House two months earlier on November 7. However, after the Democrats lost their supermajority in the United States Senate on January 19, 2010, the House decided to pass the Senate version and amend it with a third bill. This will allow the Senate to pass the amendments via the simple-majority reconciliation process.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act passed the Senate on December 24, 2009, by a vote of 60–39 and passed the House on March 21, 2010, by a vote of 219–212, with no Republicans in either house voting for the bill.
Legislative history
On November 4, 2008, after winning the presidential election, President-elect Obama announced that healthcare reform would be one of his key agenda items. On March 5, 2009, Obama formally began the reform process and held a conference with industry leaders to discuss reform. Debate over reform continued throughout the summer and Obama requested Congress pass legislation before the August recess, which Congress failed to do. During the summer recess, the Tea Party movement organized protests and many conservative groups targeted congressional town hall meetings to voice their opposition to proposed reform effort. In response, on September 9, Obama delivered a televised address to Congress to urge action. On November 7, the House of Representatives passed the Affordable Health Care for America Act (H.R. 3962) 220-215 and forwarded it to the Senate for passage.[1][2]
Senate
The Senate failed to take up debate on the House bill, instead utilizing H.R. 3590, a bill unrelated to healthcare already passed by the House, as the vehicle for their health care reform proposal, completely revising the content of the bill.[3] This method was chosen rather than initiating a new bill in the Senate because the United States Constitution requires all revenue-related bills to originate in the House.[4] The original title of H.R. 3590, before it was converted to a healthcare bill, was the Service Members Home Ownership Tax Act of 2009.[5] Although unrelated to healthcare reform, this was a revenue-related modification to the Internal Revenue Code. The bill, as amended, incorporates elements of earlier proposals that had been reported favorably by the Health and Finance committees.
Passage in the Senate was temporarily blocked by a filibuster threat by Nebraska Senator Ben Nelson who sided with Republican minority. Nelson's support for the bill was won after the bill was amended to offer a higher rate medicare reimbursement for the State of Nebraska, the compromise was derisively refered to as the Nebraska Compromise.[2] On December 23, the Senate voted 60–39 to end debate on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, eliminating the possibility of a filibuster by opponents. The bill then passed by a party-line vote of 60–39 on December 24, 2009, with one senator not voting.[6][7] This was the first time the Senate had met on Christmas Eve since 1963 (for a debate relating to the Vietnam War), and the first roll call vote on the day since 1895.[8][9]
The bill was then forwarded to the House of Representatives for debate. In the interim, on January 19, 2010, Massachusetts Republican Senator Scott Brown was elected, giving the Republican minority enough votes to sustain a filibuster in the future.[2] On February 25, President Obama unveiled a health care reform plan of his own, drawing largely from the Senate bill. On February 25, he held a meeting with leaders of both parties again urging passage of a reform bill.[2]
Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has been quoted as saying the bill does not reflect the will of the people.[10]
House
Following Brown's Senate win, the fate of the health care reform was uncertain. Rahm Emanuel argued for a less ambitious bill. Nancy Pelosi pushed back, dismissing Rahm's scaled-down approach as "Kiddie Care".[11][12] Obama in the end sided with comprehensive reform and the news that Anthem Blue Cross in California intends to hike premium rates for its patients by as much as 39% gave him a new line of argument for reform.[11][12] The Bipartisan Health Care Summit that was held on February 25, proved to be a political success for Obama, shifting the narrative away from the Massachusetts loss back to healthcare policy.[12]
The most viable option for the proponents of comprehensive reform was for the House to abandon its own health reform bill, the Affordable Health Care for America Act, and to instead pass the Senate's bill, and then pass amendments to it with a different bill allowing the Senate to pass the amendments via the reconciliation process.[13][14]
The House's reconciliation bill, the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act of 2010, was introduced in March. The House Democratic majority leaders considered using the self-executing rule method to pass the legislation in a single vote along with the Senate bill, but this plan was eventually rejected. Instead, the House held a series of votes: the first on a special rule resolution that set the terms of debate, a second on the Senate bill, a third on a minority attempt to amend the reconciliation bill itself, and finally a vote on the reconciliation bill itself.[15] The debate was divisive, with Republicans accusing Democrats of "one-party rule".[16] The House passed the bill with a vote of 219 to 212 on March 21, 2010, with 34 Democrats and all 178 Republicans voting against it.[17] President Barack Obama is expected to sign the bill on March 23, 2010.[18] The following day, Republicans introduced legislation to repeal the bill.[19]
Provisions
H.R. 3590 is divided into ten titles.[20] The text of the bill cannot be meaningfully read from front to back as printed, because the tenth title is a list of amendments to the previous nine titles.[21] These amendments must be applied to the titles and sections to which they refer before the bill can be interpreted properly.
The bill contains provisions that go into effect six months after its passage, and provisions going into effect in 2014.[22][23]
Key provisions of the bill include measures to:[24][25]
Effective six months after passage
This list is incomplete; you can help by adding missing items. |
- All insurers are fully prohibited from discriminating against or charging higher rates for children based on pre-existing conditions.[23]
- Adults with pre-existing conditions will be eligible to join a temporary high-risk pool, which will be superseded by the health care exchange in 2014.[23]
- Children and young adults will be permitted to remain on their parents' insurance plan until their 26th birthday.[26]
- Insurers are prohibited from charging co-pays or deductibles for preventative care and medical screenings on all new insurance plans.[27]
- Individuals affected by the Medicare Part D coverage gap will receive a $250 rebate, and 50 percent of the gap will be eliminated in 2011.[28]
- Insurers' abilities to enforce annual spending caps will be restricted, and completely prohibited by 2014.[23]
- Insurers are prohibited from dropping policy holders when they get sick.[23]
- Insurers are required to reveal details about administrative and executive expenditures.[23]
- Insurers are required to implement an appeals process for coverage determination and claims on all new plans.[23]
- Indoor tanning services are subjected to a 10 percent service tax.[23]
- Enhanced methods of fraud detection are implemented. [23]
- Medicare is expanded to small, rural hospitals and facilities.[23]
- Non-profit Blue Cross insurers are required to maintain a loss ratio of 85 percent or higher in order to receive tax benefits.[23]
- Companies which provide early retiree benefits for individuals aged 55-64 are eligible to participate in a temporary program which reduces premium costs.[23]
- A new website installed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services will provide consumer insurance information for individuals and small businesses in all states.[23]
- A temporary credit program is established to encourage private investment in new therapies for disease treatment and prevention.[23]
Effective by 2014
This list is incomplete; you can help by adding missing items. |
- All insurers are fully prohibited from discriminating against or charging higher rates for adult individuals based on pre-existing medical conditions.[23]
- All insurers are fully prohibited from establishing annual spending caps.[23]
- Expand Medicaid eligibility; individuals with income up to 133 percent of the poverty line qualify for coverage
- Establish health insurance exchanges, and subsidization of insurance premiums for individuals with income up to 400 percent of the poverty line.[29]
- Offer tax credits to small businesses who have fewer than 25 employees and provide health care benefits for them.
- Impose a tax penalty on employers with over fifty employees who do not offer health insurance to their workers.
- Impose an annual fine on individuals who do not obtain health insurance; exemptions to fine in cases of financial hardship or religious beliefs.
- Creation of a new voluntary long-term care insurance program.
- Creation of tax credits for individuals who purchase private insurance policies
- Employed individuals who pay more than 9.5 percent of their income on health insurance premiums will be permitted to purchase insurance policies from a state-controlled health insurance option
- Pay for new spending, in part, through spending and coverage cuts in Medicare Advantage, slowing the growth of Medicare provider payments, reducing Medicare and Medicaid drug reimbursement rate, cutting other Medicare and Medicaid spending.[25][30]
- Revenue increases from a new $2,500 limit on tax-free contributions to flexible spending accounts (FSAs), which allow for payment of health costs.[31] Raising various taxes, and creating a new excise tax for high cost "Cadillac" insurance plans.[25]
- Chain restaurants and food vendors with 20 or more locations are required to display the caloric content of their foods on menus, drive-through menus, and vending machines. Additional information, such as saturated fat, carbohydrate, and sodium content, must also be made available upon request.[32]
Effective by 2018
This list is incomplete; you can help by adding missing items. |
- All existing health insurance plans must cover preventative care and checkups without co-payment.[23]
Analysis
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) wrote:[33]
The legislation would establish a mandate for most legal residents of the United States to obtain health insurance; set up insurance exchanges through which certain individuals and families could receive federal subsidies to substantially reduce the cost of purchasing that coverage; significantly expand eligibility for Medicaid; substantially reduce the growth of Medicare’s payment rates for most services (relative to the growth rates projected under current law); impose an excise tax on insurance plans with relatively high premiums; and make various other changes to the federal tax code, Medicare, Medicaid, and other programs.
A 383-page amendment Reid offered [December 19] made some major and minor changes to the proposed legislation. Gone was a new government-run insurance program, or public option, designed to compete with private insurers. As an alternative, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, which oversees benefits for all civilian federal workers and members of Congress, would contract with private insurers to offer multistate plans on the insurance exchange. Reid dropped plans for a tax on cosmetic surgery, dubbed the 'Bo-tax,' in favor of a 10 percent levy on indoor tanning salons. And he raised a Medicare payroll tax hike to 0.9 percent, from 0.5 percent earlier, on individuals earning more than $200,000 or families making more than $250,000. Reid also boosted penalties for companies that don't provide health insurance. Any company with more than 50 employees could face a penalty of $750 per worker, multiplied by the total number of full-time workers it employs, if just one obtains subsidized coverage through an exchange. That's up from a penalty of $400 in an earlier draft.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said the bill would cover an additional 31 million uninsured Americans that do not have benefits, bringing full coverage to 94 percent of all Americans. Reid further stated that the bill will cost $848 billion over 10 years, while reducing deficits by $130 billion by adding new taxes and fees while reducing the growth of Medicare.[35]
Surgeon Atul Gawande wrote in The New Yorker that the bill contains a variety of pilot programs that may have a significant impact on cost and quality over the long-run, although these have not been factored into CBO cost estimates. He stated these pilot programs cover nearly every idea healthcare experts advocate, except malpractice/tort reform. He argued that a trial and error strategy, combined with industry and government partnership, is how the U.S. overcame a similar challenge in the agriculture industry in the early 20th century.[36]
Deficit impact
According to the CBO, the legislation will reduce the deficit by $138 billion over the first decade and by $1.2 trillion in the second decade.[37][33] The CBO has been continually revising their estimates, changing from a savings of $132 billion to $118 billion and then to $143 billion.[38][39] The CBO estimates the cost of the first decade at $940 billion, $923 billion of which takes place during the final six years (2014–2019) when the benefits kick in.[39][40]
Legal challenges
Organizations and lawmakers who opposed the passage of the bill have threatened to take legal action against it upon its passage.[41] The target of the lawsuits would be several key provisions of the bill. Opponents claim that fining individuals for failing to buy insurance is not within the scope of Congress' taxing powers. The mandate requiring individuals to purchase health insurance is another provision likely to be challenged. Governor of Idaho Butch Otter was the first state governor to put a framework together to begin a legal challenge.[42]
Attorneys-General of eleven states (Alabama, Florida, Nebraska, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Washington) announced on March 22 their intentions to sue the federal government, citing the bill as a violation of state sovereignty and saying Congress has no authority to require individuals to purchase health insurance.[43][44] All eleven of the Attorneys-General involved in the proposed suit are members of the Republican Party.[45]
See also
- Comparison of Canadian and American health care systems
- Health care reform in the United States
- Health care reform debate in the United States
References
- ^ Roll call vote 887, via Clerk.House.gov
- ^ a b c d "Timeline: Milestones in Obama's quest for healthcare reform". Rueters. Retrieved 2010-03-22.
- ^ S.Amdt. 2786 Leader's Amendment to H.R. 3590 in the nature of a substitute, November 21, 2009.
- ^ Ballasy, Nicholas, "Reid 'Likely' to Make Entire Health Bill an Amendment to Unrelated Tax Bill That House Passed in March", CNSNews.com, October 7, 2009
- ^ Service Members Home Ownership Tax Act of 2009
- ^ Senate Passes Health Care Bill - WBOY-TV - WBOY.com
- ^ Roll call vote 396, via Senate.gov
- ^ Young, Jeffrey (December 24, 2009). "Senate passes historic healthcare reform legislation in 60–39 vote". thehill.com. Retrieved 2010-01-13.
- ^ Kiely, Kathy (December 24, 2009). "Senate passes health care bill". USA Today. Retrieved 2010-01-13.
- ^ "Democrats hail landmark US healthcare bill", BBC, March 22nd, 2010
{{citation}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ a b "Health Vote Caps a Journey Back From the Brink". New York Times. Retrieved 2010-03-23.
- ^ a b c "Pelosi steeled W.H. for health push". Politico. Retrieved 2010-03-23.
- ^ "Obama Urges Up-or-Down Vote on Health Care Bill". New York Times. March 3, 2010. Retrieved 2010-03-03.
- ^ Gay, Sheryl (March 17, 2010). "Health Vote Caps a Journey Back From the Brink". The New York Times. Retrieved 2010-03-21.
- ^ "COMMITTEE ON RULES – Senate Amendments to H.R. 3590 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act H.R. 4872 Reconciliation Act of 2010". Rules.house.gov. Retrieved 2010-03-21.
- ^ "Pelosi Defends Health Care Fight Tactics". CBS News. March 22, 2010. Retrieved 2010-03-23.
- ^ Roll call vote 167, via Clerk.House.gov
- ^ Shailagh Murray, Lori Montgomery and Scott Wilson, (March 22 2010). "Obama to sign health-care bill into law Tuesday". Washington Post.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ "Pelosi Defends Health Care Fight Tactics". CBS News. March 22, 2010. Retrieved 2010-03-23.
- ^ HR 3590 from Wikisource.
- ^ Title X
- ^ "Key Points Of The Health Care Reform Bil". The Kentucky Post.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|accedate=
ignored (help) - ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Binckes, Jeremy (2010-03-22). "The Top 18 Immediate Effects Of The Health Care Bill". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 2010-03-22.
{{cite news}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ "Comparing the House and the Senate Health Care Proposals". New York Times. March 23, 2010..
- ^ a b c "Updated Health Care Charts". Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. November 19, 2009..
- ^ H.R. 3590 Public Print, section 2714: A group health plan and a health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage that provides dependent coverage of children shall continue to make such coverage available for an adult child (who is not married) until the child turns 26 years of age.
- ^ Bowman, Lee (2010-03-22). "Health reform bill will cause several near-term changes". Scripps Howard News Service. Retrieved 2010-03-23.
{{cite news}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help) - ^ Rao, Smriti (2010-03-22). "Health-Care Reform Passed. So What Does It Mean?". 80beats. Discover. Retrieved 2010-03-23.
{{cite news}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help) - ^ Galewitz, Phil (2010-03-22). "Health reform and you: A new guide". Kaiser Health News. MSNBC. Retrieved 2010-03-23.
{{cite news}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help) - ^ "Health-Care Overhaul Proposals". Wall Street Journal. March 18, 2010..
- ^ Burkes, Paula (November 8, 2009). "Medical Expense Accounts Could be Limited to $2,500". The Oklahoman..
- ^ Spencer, Jean (2010-03-22). "Menu Measure: Health Bill Requires Calorie Disclosure". Washington Wire. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2010-03-23.
{{cite news}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=
(help) - ^ a b "Correction Regarding the Longer-Term Effects of the Manager's Amendment to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act" (PDF). Congressional Budget Office. December 19, 2009. Retrieved March 22, 2010.
- ^ Litvan, Laura; Kristen Jensen (December 20, 2009). "Senate's Health-Care Legislation Poised for Passage". Bloomberg L.P. Retrieved March 22, 2010.
- ^ Pear, Robert; David M. Herszenhorn (November 18, 2009). "Senate Says Health Plan Will Cover Another 31 Million". New York Times. Retrieved March 22, 2010.
- ^ Gawande, Atul (2009). "Testing, Testing". The New Yorker. Retrieved March 22, 2010.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ CNN (December 19, 2009). "Senate Democrats win over key holdouts to reach 60 votes on reform bill". Retrieved March 22, 2010.
{{cite news}}
:|author=
has generic name (help). - ^ "H.R. 3590, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act" (PDF). Congressional Budget Office. March 11, 2010. Retrieved March 22, 2010..
- ^ a b "H.R. 4872, Reconciliation Act of 2010" (PDF). Congressional Budget Office. March 18, 2010. Retrieved March 22, 2010..
- ^ Dennis, Steven (March 18, 2010). "CBO: Health Care Overhaul Would Cost $940 Billion". Roll Call. Economist Group. Retrieved March 22, 2010.
- ^ "Health Care Bill Could Face String of Legal Challenges". FOX News. December 22, 2009. Retrieved 2010-03-22.
- ^ Murphy, Brian (March 18, 2010). "Otter is the first governor to sign a law saying the state will defy a requirement to buy insurance". Idaho Statesman. Retrieved 2010-03-22.
- ^ Goodhue, David (March 22, 2010). "Attoneys General Sue To Stop Health Care Bill". AHN News. Retrieved 2010-03-22.
- ^ Richey, Warren (March 22, 2010). "Attorneys general in 11 states poised to challenge healthcare bill". Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved 2010-03-22.
- ^ Khan, Huma (March 23, 2010). "Obama to Sign Health Care Bill Today as GOP Challenges Constitutionality". ABC News. Retrieved 2010-03-23.
External links
- Copies of the proposed bill hosted online or readily downloadable
- Plain Text or PDF formats of H.R. 3590, as engrossed or passed by the Senate and printed via FDsys. Dec. 24
- The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, full text, summary, background, provisions and more, via Democratic Policy Committee (Senate.gov)
- Overview of H.R. 3590 under consideration (December 10, 2009) via THOMAS.
- Entry for H.R. 3590 at GovTrack
- Latest Congressional Budget Office scoring (all previous scoring for now superseded Senate bills no longer applies)
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Incorporation of the Manager's Amendment, SA 3276 − December 19, 2009
- Base Analysis – H.R. 3590, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, − November 18, 2009.
↑ (The Additional and/or Related CBO reporting that follows can be accessed from the above link)- Budgetary Treatment of Proposals to Regulate Medical Loss Ratios − Dec. 13
- Additional Information about Employment-Based Coverage − Dec. 7
- Estimated Average Premiums Under Current Law − Dec. 5
- An Analysis of Health Insurance Premiums Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act − Nov. 30
- Additional Information on CLASS Program Proposals − Nov. 25
- Estimated Effects on the Status of the Hospital Insurance Trust Fund − Nov. 21
- Estimated Effects on Medicare Advantage Enrollment and Benefits Not Covered by Medicare − Nov. 21
- Estimated Distribution of Individual Mandate Penalties − Nov. 20
- Analysis of Subsidies and Payments at Different Income Levels − Nov. 20
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Estimates of the impact of H.R. 3590
- Estimated Financial Effects of the "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2009," as Proposed by the Senate Majority Leader on November 18, 2009, December 10, 2009
- Estimated Effects of the "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act" on the Year of Exhaustion for the Part A Trust Fund, Part B Premiums, and Part A and Part B Coinsurance Amounts, December 10, 2009
- Additional commercially hosted information complimenting H.R. 3590
- Comparison of House and Senate bills. "Key Differences in the Health Care Plans". The New York Times. November 19, 2009.
- Chris L. Peterson, A Comparative Analysis of Private Health Insurance Provisions of H.R. 3962 and S.Amdt. 2786 to H.R. 3590, Congressional Research Service, R40981, December 16, 2009