Jump to content

User talk:Off2riorob

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bsw123 (talk | contribs) at 21:31, 29 March 2010. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This page has been removed from search engines' indexes.

Duck Test

Well, it could be a rabbit in disguise !
Hungry?... Have a pizza!

(Manual archive list)


Holy Sh*t

[[1]] Hell In A Bucket (talk) 19:22, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How does it go, ride, boldly ride, if you seek for El dorado. Off2riorob (talk) 19:34, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eldorado

Gaily bedight, A gallant knight

In sunshine and in shadow, Had journeyed long, Singing a song, 'In search of Eldorado.

But he grew old- This knight so bold- And o'er his heart a shadow Fell as he found No spot of ground That looked like Eldorado.

And, as his strength Failed him at length, He met a pilgrim shadow- "Shadow," said he, "Where can it be- This land of Eldorado?"

"Over the Mountains Of the Moon, Down the Valley of the Shadow, Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied- "If you seek for Eldorado!"

Edgar Allan Poe

pimp that cadillac on 24's —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.211.27.5 (talk) 01:56, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Blessings of cake and camaraderie ...

Free at last, amigo. Free at last. Cheers. Proofreader77 (interact) 06:46, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, what a night, groovy. Off2riorob (talk) 06:49, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Seeing as all of the talk has thus far been on my own talkpage. I just wished to thank you on your own talkpage for bringing my attention to the hoax issue. A very serious issue for wikipedia even though some editors may not have initially realised, including myself. I think I will re-add Arthur de Rothschild at some point soon because he was obviously notable and a good, if minor, addition to the project. But you were right in following the leads you had. Polargeo (talk) 12:04, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was quite exciting, a fantastic hoax. I didn't Know Arthur got deleted in the mellee, he was at least real and quite a noted member of the family, lets get him replaced. Thanks to you for taking the time (and belief) to look deeper into it. Off2riorob (talk) 19:40, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Another significant Rothschild missing from Wikipedia is Maurice (c. 1881-1957), son of Edmond. He was a minor politician involved in a bribery scandal, considered a wastrel, and later in life made his own large fortune trading in commodities and stocks after he fled from Europe.Benf64 (talk) 03:52, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, I guess. Kind of funny (pretending to be nobility, for the recognition and standing, is such a quaint mischief), kind of sad. Benf64 (talk) 03:23, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, if he put the energy into something real he would likely be doing very well. Off2riorob (talk) 03:28, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ben, you are very welcome to create the article, you seem to have good Knowledge in the field. Off2riorob (talk) 03:56, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Christo Re

Thank you for your Corcovado Christ. It's one of my favourites, with il Cristo Re de Bienno (Italy) a little one, overlooking the valley ...

Statua di Cristo Re (Timo Bortolotti - 1930)

--Raymondnivet (talk) 12:06, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Barnstar

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I think you deserve this for your tireless yet unpaid-for hard work, and impressive contributions over the years :) Regards Scieberking (talk) 16:53, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Scieberking, you overstate my contributions but thank you for your thoughts, obsession might be a better description recently, regards to you too. Off2riorob (talk) 16:57, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
18694 edits is obviously something I don't see everywhere. I've been around barely two months though and I love giving barnstars. Regards Scieberking (talk) 17:14, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Graciously accepted. Off2riorob (talk) 17:17, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Rothschild hoax

Change of subject: the real Rothschilds have acted swiftly. All Stefan's fake sites have been taken down, and he has been taken off the Huffington Post both as de Rothschild and as Roberts, and off Twitter. No wine yet, though. Cheers, JohnCD (talk) 11:07, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

...and he is now getting more internet publicity than perhaps even he wants. JohnCD (talk) 13:17, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, that is a development, perhaps the New York times will be commenting as they also had a two and a half million pledge to Haiti from the fictitious company Rothschild Estates in their paper, they were also scammed. Thank you for the updates, it is making me very thirsty though, that Rothschild wine would be greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 19:17, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you like Bordeaux, may I recommend the 1982 Château Lafite Rothschild. One of my favourites. Beganlocal (talk) 23:12, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gerald Blanchard Story

thanks for your help i'am the real Gerald Blanchard and the page is not correct I have written to Uk times to have them correct the story but no response. I have done a interview with wired mag they are printing a 13 page story that corrects the false stories out there I will be in March issue then it would be nice to help me use that as a reference to change the page as that one person keeps changing it back my email is ******* thanks for you help —Preceding unsigned comment added by Possltd (talk • contribs) 15:20, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, no worries, If I can help I will. Best wishes to you. Off2riorob (talk) 15:24, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dean Chamberlain

Thanks for the kind words, I hope it's enough to remove the BLP and other notices (since it looks like it will probably survive AfD). I appreciate the source you provided! — Catherine\talk 20:21, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The BLP Barnstar
For your effort in making biography articles adhere to high standards Sole Soul (talk) 10:55, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Soul, I think it is our biggest responsibility and I also enjoy it. Off2riorob (talk) 10:57, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the barnstar, I really appreciate it. Sole Soul (talk) 13:13, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Copy vios

FASTILY (TALK) 01:38, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 12:43, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DaL33T (talk) 12:36, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

The Purple Star The Purple Star
For being one of those hit hard by 212.183.140.17. DaL33T (talk) 18:13, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Clayton_Powell_IV_(politician)

As per the request of Asaamblymember Adam Clayton Powell, we would like his Bio to be clear from any erroneous info.

Someone has been messing with several people including Assemblymember Adriano Espaillat and Assemblymember Jose Peralta.

Please make necessary corrections,

Best,

Aneiry Batista —Preceding unsigned comment added by Denny Pichardo (talk • contribs) 21:30, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oleg Deripaska

Do you work for Oleg Deripaska or for a PR firm representing him in the UK?Moscowrussia (talk) 11:52, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I work for free for the Wikipedia. Off2riorob (talk) 14:16, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fan Club

VB Stubbie
VB Stubbie

Looks like you got a fan club and sock farm all in one go Rob....Hell In A Bucket (talk) 22:40, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is true. What is it like Off2riorob? Sir Floyd (talk) 04:32, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's simply a waste of what could be more productive time. Pass me the block button. Off2riorob (talk) 07:13, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Have a beer Mate! Sir Floyd (talk) 09:10, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Floyd, you must be reading my mind, I am off downtown to get some ingredients for a cake party at Proof's place later and I will have your VB and a couple more as I pass the waterholes along the way , many thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 09:16, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Did you know?

When Sir Floyd was little he was driven around in a Ford Zephyr Mark II.

Ford Zephyr Mark II

Sir Floyd (talk) 23:55, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Haven't seen you around

The good old days. Edit wars on Polanski, a few trips to AN/ANI, yada yada, and suddenly you're a stranger. I'd offer you a piece of Portal cake, but we know how that went. Sort of miss Proof. Oberonfitch (talk) 06:11, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Polanski. There must be movement one way or the other pretty soon now. Hi Oberon, I am still keeping an eye out, so to speak. I saw you yesterday going on wiki-break, lets meet up soon. Alas Proofreader, a part of the creative poetic intelligentsia the likes of which fits uneasy with the confines of the wikippedia, take it easy Oberon. Off2riorob (talk) 10:21, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

The Editor's Barnstar

The Editor's Barnstar
For your help on Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi- your edits really pushed the article towards stabilization and encouraged discussion. Thanks for your efforts. Omirocksthisworld(Drop a line) 06:06, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, what a nice wake up present, many thanks Omirockthisworld. It is often easy as an outsider to see the middle ground, good luck to you. Off2riorob (talk) 10:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

you said for my page to be deleted

I do have permission from that site owner & also, that page bio was there because it was a listing of various bios for an event that has since past. and that particular page has been deleted because the event is past. please don't delete. thanks

(i'm trying to figure this all out)

marierec —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marierec (talk • contribs) 19:46, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Best thing is if you just forget about it and get your own blog. Off2riorob (talk) 19:51, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"... even if you block me i will be immortal in this page's history"

Apparently not :3 - Alison ❤ 05:50, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

lol, might be immortal i the page history, but no one will care —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abb615 (talk • contribs) 05:53, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
roflmao Hell In A Bucket (talk) 06:00, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't this section itself be deleted as WP:DENY?— Dædαlus Contribs 06:51, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's WP:VANDALISMISCLEARLYPOINTLESSANDSIMPLYEPHEMERAL and shows that doing this stuff to ensure it's "permanent" is a complete waste of time - Alison ❤ 06:55, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ahh, so it's an announcement to any who may try such. Okay. :) — Dædαlus Contribs 07:00, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Right. Including the guy who's doing this, as he's repeatedly stated it on a number of pages (and I've RD2'd them all) - Alison ❤ 07:01, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I just spit coffee all over my desk when I read this one :) Making your contributions to the internet immortal is easy, doing it in a way that doesn't make you look like an ass is much more of a stretch. Trusilver 18:29, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pole dancing pretties

are you going to tell me what's wrong with russian documentaries or just continue reverting?--Sinistrial (talk) 15:52, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the youtube parts, recording a documentary from a russian tv station and putting it on youtube doesn't make it unreliable LOL--Sinistrial (talk) 15:12, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)It does, however, make it a copyright infringement... – Toon 15:14, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you can prove NTV (Russia) makes stuff up on their shows, you have to leave it in. owned --Sinistrial (talk) 16:30, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Roger Clinton, Jr.

Hi, I removed the PROD tag on Roger Clinton, Jr., I think he has sufficient notability, if you're hung up on it, then you might want to do an AfD. Woogee (talk) 22:33, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Where do I find your email address? Antlion1932 (talk) 05:54, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kuo

David_Kuo_(author) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Perhaps you should wait for discussion before you change as well. Look at his belief.net bio. Bass fisherman features prominently. He discusses in other interviews. It seems that although you pick some nit that what you really want to do is eliminate the neutrality of the article.

I've changed it back. Now let's see if you discuss the issues before changes are meade..... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bookpublishersreviewer (talk • contribs) 18:14, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't want to interrupt you, but...

The BLP Barnstar
I just have to say, nice work with Bill McNutt III! NW (Talk) 03:06, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, many thanks NW. Off2riorob (talk) 03:15, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kuo

Looks better now. You need to proof it though. Lots of typos. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Connection39 (talk • contribs) 11:57, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom/Article title

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom/Article title. DrKiernan (talk) 09:13, 18 March 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})[reply]

Thirty days of discussion and you want to talk more...move on. Off2riorob (talk) 16:44, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tammy Jennings

Hi. Remember this lady, who you have been keeping in your cellar for a couple of months? When I closed her AfD as delete, I said I would undelete her on request if she was elected on 20 Mar; then I told you I might be away then and asked you to take charge. It turns out that I shall not be away after all, so I will look after letting her out if necessary. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:30, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes thanks John, I was looking at her the other day and did a google to see what was new but nothing much was showing as yet, regards. Off2riorob (talk) 21:31, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I see her supporters have moved her article back into the mainspace, though according to South Australian state election, 2010 she has not in fact been elected. I will wait a day or so for the final results, but unless she has in fact been elected I shall delete her again per G4, as the only claimed notability at the AfD was that she was "virtually guaranteed" a seat. Anyone who wants the article back will have to go through DRV. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:44, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

will hanrahan

Many thanks for your supportive and understanding notes re the vandalism of the Will Hanrahan page. If, when googling and discovering the wiki reference, the insulting reference originally placed by the 'vandal' was not present, I would be happy for the page to stay.

The vandal's comments were designed to be hurtful, not factual, included one very damaging comment which is a simple, clear libel and very wicked, and were not a contribution to the excellent Wikipedia that anyone can be proud of. The comment in question, in my opinion, constitutes harassment and I have to inform the police.

I would prefer that the page was locked indefinitely and whatever 'accelerator' method the vandal is using to retain 'blink and you'd miss him' in the google description of the wikipedia page somehow be removed.

Regards.Willhanrahan (talk) 11:57, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, have you considered identifying yourself to the OTRS team, that way your comments would be more authoritative, it you want I can give you a link, also if is better to ask experienced editors for help than to bring up legal issues as that is a wikipedia no no and will get you restricted from editing, please take care with that, John is very experienced and a good person to ask questions. Regards. Off2riorob (talk) 12:02, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello offtorio! I am Will Hanrahan and this has been confirmed by the issue of a ticket number by moonriddengirl. The page about me was heavily vandalised last week and my attention was drawn to it. Hitherto, I was only vaguely aware of it. I have tried to correct one or two factual mistakes and have removed comments attriuted to me. I have also toned down the personal nature of it. If it has to be there, I would prefer it to stick to facts. A couple of points re. your own rather excellent input. I did, indeed, work on the Bootle Times from 1977 to 1980. Secondly, Trexx and Flipside is a narrative situation comedy and is, as such, the only one in the BBC's library of programming. The BBC HAS featured black people in its comedies, but there had never until 'T and F.' been such a strong representation of Black people. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Willhanrahan (talk • contribs) 11:27, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

McCormick Tribune Plaza & Ice Rink FAC

Since you commented at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Park Grill, you may be interested in commenting at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/McCormick Tribune Plaza & Ice Rink/archive1, which has not received much commentary.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:49, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Harbhajan Singh Yogi

Could you take a look at this article please? Not a BLP, but a lot of scandal info. It alternates between a hagiography and a litigation outlet. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 05:34, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quick look, it is not very readable, two much legal jargon and attempts to push this and that position which adds only confusion, I will have a look laterin a bit more depth. Off2riorob (talk) 14:48, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, the article is a real mess. I've been trying [for more than a few months] to clean up after both sides, but after a while, you just don't feel able to. Most sources on both sides of the spectrum are primary, and it also appears that the lead editor of the article is also the "official" biographer of the subject (read something to that effect on the talk page I think). —SpacemanSpiff 15:34, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
All that excessive quoting of text seems excessive and needs a simple summarization. Off2riorob (talk) 16:11, 20 March 2010 (UTC)d[reply]

Alt captions

Head shot of male with neat goatee, wearing black t-shirt and black baseball cap.He is smiling and looking at the camera is nonsense. In the first place, it should include the "male"'s name, secondly "neat goatee" is POV. Woogee (talk) 20:38, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't consider him easy to engage in discussion when he's basically calling me stupid. Woogee (talk) 20:45, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
He seems well meaning... ha ha, oh dear.. chill pill.Off2riorob (talk) 20:47, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
He's claiming that alt text is required. Where is the policy which requires it? Woogee (talk) 20:49, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it is actually policy but it is an up and coming thing to add, it is a requirement of a wikipedia good article. Off2riorob (talk) 20:51, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia_talk:Alternative_text_for_images#Violating_POV. Woogee (talk) 21:01, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see he's got User:Rrius pissed off at him now. [User_talk:Rrius#Wikipedia:Alternative_text_for_images] Woogee (talk) 21:54, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, he needs to take his time a little more, that is three editors in an hour. Off2riorob (talk) 22:33, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Rob, it is most definitely not "an up and coming thing to add"; it's been removed as a requirement even for featured articles, let alone any other kind. – iridescent 22:41, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, thank you for pointing that out for me, I have quite recently been involved in a few good article nominations and keeps and have always been requested and required to add the alt. I will take that on board. Off2riorob (talk) 22:46, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No problem (if someone's been demanding it at GAC, give them a good trouting, as it's never been a GAC requirement). If you want to feel yourself gradually losing the will to live, you can see the foul-tempered arguments that led to WP:ALT being foisted on FAC as a requirement and then a few months later being unceremoniously removed, at this 350kb discussion, which was impressively foul-tempered even by WT:FAC's low standards. – iridescent 22:51, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Much appreciated, I will save that link until I am feeling strong. best. Off2riorob (talk) 22:58, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

You got mentioned in this thread, notifying you since the originator didn't: WP:ANI#Unresponsive user —ShadowRanger (talk|stalk) 21:19, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ShadowRanger. Off2riorob (talk) 12:22, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SPI on User:B-Wuuu

Hello. Since you commented on the noticeboard report that was filed about this user, I'm informing you that I have filed a sockpuppet report concerning him as well. It's here. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:26, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thanks. Looks like Sorrywrongnumber is the sock master, a four year old account, wikipedia needs to do something to stop such disruptive socking, without it this place would be a much more stable place, well done.Off2riorob (talk) 12:33, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BNP

Sorry, I got your first message when I was in the middle of something and couldn't attend to it, and since I have the memory of a goldfish I immediately forgot all about it. I'll have a look now; thanks for the prod. Steve Smith (talk) 23:18, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just went over the talk page, and I'm afraid that I despair: there is no goodwill, no agreement on in what respects the present article is deficient, and no consensus on where it should go. I'd like to be able to endorse your plan to use the PR as a roadmap, but I just can't see that happening. I'm of the view that the Wikipedia model does not really work for controversial articles, and I fear that the BNP article is in the process of proving me right. Sorry to be all doom and gloom-like. Steve Smith (talk) 23:43, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your intelligent comments in a site that seems frequently devoid of intelligence.

And, I really mean it. You have identified one of many obvious examples of extreme over-reaction by what I call 'the cabal'. Am I violating WP rules? Perhaps, but I see a larger issue. If there are too many POV-pushers around, it's very hard to dislodge them. (I didn't write that: It's on the WP:BLP discussion page.) Gogo Dodo showed up many times, starting at JDB's arrival at 'jim bell', did nothing but revert Bell's edits Then, Gogo Dodo inexplicably disappeared. As if he had been called to do a job. Notice too that Skomorokh initially reverted some of Keystroke's edits, which had been reasonable, but Skomorokh gave up after that first exchange. The fact that very few people have tried to revert Keystroke, and they did so before they actually challeged him on the talk: page, shows that they can't deny there were POV and BLP violations. 97.120.242.154 (talk) 02:37, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive591#User:James_dalton_bell FYI (you'll have to scroll a bit up). --NeilN talk to me 02:43, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Notice that Daedalus969's Jan 17 edit said that Gogo Dodo has been 'polite'. What a laugh! If you look at Dodo's 'contributions' during December 26, 2009-Jan 3, 2010 time frame, he says virtually nothing. "Polite"??? If a person comes up to you, slaps you in the face repeatedly, and then says, "Excuse me, Goodbye", that doesn't qualify as 'polite' does it? Also, notice that Gogo Dodo disappeared (after his Dec 31, 2009 edit) shortly before NeilN magically appeared, on January 3, 2010. Neither Gogo Dodo nor NeilN had edited on "jim bell" even once prior to December 26, 2009. (who he knew was an extreme newbie.) Gogo Dodo NEVER put any comment on the talk: page, even though he knew that Bell was an extreme 'newbie'. (Only editing WP since Dec 26, 2009.) I don't consider it even remotely likely that Gogo Dodo 'just happened to' find my edits first, repeatedly, in front of dozens (hundreds?) of other editors or administrators. NeilN is continuing to conceal the commentary in wp:blpn, in a fashion which has turned into a joke. He doesn't want his actions publicized. These coincidences at least point to Gogo Dodo being a meat-puppet for somebody. Who? When they make that phony claim about how Gogo Dodo was 'polite', please don't believe it! 97.120.246.46 (talk) 04:47, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Easy to refute Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive589#Jim_Bell_and_James_dalton_bell.C2.A0.28talk.C2.A0.C2.B7_contribs.29 --NeilN talk to me 04:55, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User won't discuss. Thank you. —DoRD (talk) 21:33, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, DoRD. Off2riorob (talk) 21:41, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Off2riorob. You have new messages at Hell in a Bucket's talk page.
Message added 15:20, 25 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:20, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Modified

I'm a bit concerned about this [2]. It does appear that your edits were altered; even on the talk page of a user, I think that's a big no-no. Since they are your edits, I am just notifying you. If it were me, I would restore them and ask the user to not alter what you wrote, but I am not sure of the policy since it is a personal user talk page. -OberRanks (talk) 03:56, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi OberRanks, thanks for pointing that out. Off2riorob (talk) 09:23, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Peaches

Hello Off2riorob. Following your request on my talk page I have semi'd Peaches Geldof. There was quite enough nonsense going on before, however coincidentally my protection came soon after another development for the article's subject.[3] I am distracted elsewhere currently, so perhaps you could keep an eye on this now that it's hit the main press. In case you are not aware, though I suspect you may be, the Daily Mail is one of the more popular newspapers in the UK, and it could be argued there is enough notability for inclusion of the story and relevant denials. Hopefully the semi should take care of the worst of it, but I don't think this is the last we'll hear of it. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:23, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your attention, better fully protect it if you would for a couple of weeks, they will keep coming and adding it repeatedly, they are like a virus.There appears to be a rising consensus amongst users that the wikipedia is a name calling celeb blog where they can come and add whatever they want to Off2riorob (talk) 20:28, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I started an ANI thread and miscalculated that you had breached 3RR when clearly you hadn't. Whatever our arguments over the last 24 hours, I got this badly wrong and I'm sorry about it. I deleted the ANI thread as soon as I realised I'd cocked it up. --Mkativerata (talk) 21:33, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well thank you, your removal edit conflicted my reply which we will never now get to see, forget about it. Off2riorob (talk) 21:35, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Twit

I was just seeking clarification that by referring to a twit, you meant the post. I believe the correct word is "tweet", not "twit" but as I don't use twitter it is possible that both are correct. Mjroots (talk) 02:58, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your note

I agree, but any attempt to remove those claims would likely be reverted if they've been widely enough published, though the sexual assault one is a bit worrying even if reliably published. SlimVirgin TALK contribs 18:51, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm astonished that you cannot see that it is you who is being disruptive and imposing your views on the article. I will be reporting you for abuse of Wikipedia and seeking help in resolving this issue.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Off2riorob&oldid=352821929"