Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Maquiguy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cunard (talk | contribs) at 04:56, 30 March 2010 (add). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Maquiguy

Maquiguy (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Maquiguy/Archive.


Report date March 30 2010, 02:18 (UTC)


Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Ronz

New editor Maquiguy (talk · contribs) reverts to version of Maqui berry by recently blocked editor Iwebwork (talk · contribs), making two minor edits to the revert. Article content copied from hubpages.com/hub/The-Origins-of-the-Maqui-Berry. --Ronz (talk) 02:18, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.

I would like to respectfully request that this matter be looked into by a real administrator. Ronz (talk · contribs) is abusing his roll back previllages and has made it his personal goal to vandalize and delete my content. even going so far as to getting my account banned on a technicality, I was not aware of the username policy. and had I known I would have requested a user-name change long ago. I cannot be accused of a sockpuppet because I only have one active account. I will be appealing the block decision. this all stems from Maqui_Berry where user feels the content is unworthy and has been actively vandalizing the page. this is very frustrating, I am trying to make this section of wikipedia a better place. Disclaimer: I own the copyright to hubpages.com/hub/The-Origins-of-the-Maqui-Berry and can prove it Maquiguy (talk) 03:43, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would further like to state that, Ronz (talk · contribs) did not provide any warning to the username violation and went straight to

"""" I'm requesting your account be blocked per WP:U. --Ronz (talk) 20:19, 29 March 2010 (UTC) """ Maquiguy (talk) 03:57, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Looking at the evidence, there appears to be sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry going on. The accusations made by Maquiguy against Ronz are baseless; Ronz is doing a superb job in defending the encyclopedia from spam. Cunard (talk) 04:56, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: D (3RR using socks )
Current status – Awaiting initial clerk review.    Requested by Ronz (talk) 02:18, 30 March 2010 (UTC) [reply]