Talk:List of Latin phrases (E)

Languages List‑class

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Latin Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Tip: #section links are case-sensitive on most browsers

Links from this article with broken #section links :
[[legal term#Ex parte|legal term]]

You can remove this template after fixing the problems | FAQ | Report a problem

Links from this article which need disambiguation (check | fix): [[law of the sea]]

For help fixing these links, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Disambiguation/Fixing a page.

Last updated by WildBot 14 years ago | FAQ | Report a problem

exempli gratia

Shouldn't e.g. just be listed once as exempli gratia _(e.g.) instead of having BOTH exempli gratia AND e.g.? This would 1) make it more succinct instead of having two listings for the same phrase, and 2) fit more in line with the style of other such acronyms/abbreviatsions (e.g. i.e. which only has the listing as id est _(i.e.)). It just seems rather pointless to have both entries since they mean the same thing (because they are the same thing). Pyrotics (talk) 17:08, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]