Talk:2010 Nuclear Security Summit
Appearance
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2010 Nuclear Security Summit article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
International relations Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
A news item involving 2010 Nuclear Security Summit was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 14 April 2010. |
Title
There is a planned summit in South Korea in 2 years. Would 2010 Nuclear Security Summit be a better title for this article? --BrokenSphereMsg me 23:00, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- The article for the 2012 summit has been created as well at: Nuclear Security Summit (2012). To me, it's "six of one, half a dozen of another" to have the year at the beginning. Plus, 2010 Nuclear Security Summit is a redirect to this article so it will get people here.
- So, to summarize, we currently have:
- Nuclear Security Summit (2010)
- Nuclear Security Summit (2012)
My vote is Keep as is.—Diiscool (talk) 00:08, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral. On second thought, looking at what has been done with Commons:Category:2010 Nuclear Security Summit and a number of other conferences and summits, I don't mind if someone moves this article—well, switches this article—with "2010 Nuclear Security Summit" (but don't forget to do 2012 Nuclear Security Summit too). —Diiscool (talk) 00:16, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
Schedule Info
Why is the Schedule Section completely devoted to only detailing the US president's schedule? Wouldn't it be better if some other countries schedules were included? —Preceding unsigned comment added by JackRendar (talk • contribs) 14:28, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
- A table could be added if anyone were to provide a schedule with such information. If you have one, feel more than happy to add it.--76.213.221.152 (talk) 15:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC)