Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Rotolo

Katie Rotolo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article appears to have been created for promotional purposes (recently appeared in...), and/or to try to establish the person's notability. While apparently she's on IMDB, that doesn't make someone notable. Also, there appears to be a conflict of interest, given the user name and the user account having only this contribution. — Timneu22 · talk 14:27, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

delete - seems promotional and probably WP:COI as the nom states. Also, many of her supposed credits are not in IMDB. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:35, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

interesting point. if you go to the vimeo link you can watch the Lies credit. It's a short film and as a filmmaker I know things like that often don't exist on IMDb. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JRomeoT (talk • contribs) 14:43, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Appears to fail WP:PEOPLE; can not find any significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources, except for the IMDB listing which is not sufficient by itself. Davnor (talk) 14:49, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this person. Joe Chill (talk) 01:47, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as too soon. While yes, she exists, her career fails ENT[1], and her coverage fails GNG. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:02, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - zero evidence of notability from even remotely reliable sources. She may be a fine young actor, but she's not yet notable and has had no notable roles. The IMBD link is a dead one. 24.97.138.94 (talk) 20:37, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]