Jump to content

User talk:82.181.234.211

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 82.181.234.211 (talk) at 16:31, 28 May 2010 (→Ivangorod). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Rurik, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Yopie (talk) 00:18, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

May 2010

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Leopold, Prince of Hohenzollern. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. SamEV (talk) 01:15, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

same to yourself. In addition, do not erase commentys on talkpages from other editors. 82.181.234.211 (talk) 01:23, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: Talk:Leopold, Prince of Hohenzollern. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SamEV (talk) 01:59, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

clearly, Mr SamEV has too thin a skin. It is not a personal attack to criticise the comment of SamEV. that's a basic thing: some editor (such as SamEV) could well make a stupid and unwarranted and untenable comment, and to point out such a stupidity is not personal attack but a part of proper editing encyclopedia. If SamEV does not want to see crirticism aganist his incorrect views, them SamEV simply needs to stop make edits (deletions) and comments - in that way there'll not be anthing to citicize against in his work.... and, this problematic stance of SsmEV is not helped by him distributing unwarranted tags as 'cautions'. 82.181.234.211 (talk) 07:48, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Principality of Seborga, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Yopie (talk) 10:34, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Unfirtunately, mr Yopie, in his eagerness to defend something there whic is either original research, or worse, an unfounded allegation, edited away my query for citation, this shows how misguided and unwelcome are Yopie's that editing with proncipality of Seborga. 82.181.234.211 (talk) 12:25, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: User talk:Yopie. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Yopie (talk) 12:50, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

this shows that Yopie deliberately edited away a warranted warning to him. After which, the Yopie came here to accuse. I am really wondering what sort of twisted personality this Yopie is. 82.181.234.211 (talk) 14:08, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]



If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Yopie (talk) 13:12, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This accusatiuon of using language other than English, seems wrong. My comments have beebn in english. yopie should show with precise links where a comment is not english, if wants to contimue in this unwarranted vein. All in all, this behavior from Yopie shows how twisted a personality he is. 82.181.234.211 (talk) 14:10, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, 82.181.234.211, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Outback the koala (talk) 21:34, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 82.181.234.211. You have new messages at Outback the koala's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Outback the koala (talk) 21:34, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hohenstaufen descendants

to Outback-koala: you are wrong to make an edit that there are no hohenstaufen descendants alive. Every good genealogisat knows that females of the Hohenstaufens have a lot of descendanys alive today. It is only the male line which went extinct with Conradin. And this fact is visible in plenty of published genealogies. please stop to make edits which are factually incorrect..... 82.181.234.211 (talk) 23:15, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here is visible the allegation which Mr Koala is now trying to hide. 82.181.234.211 (talk) 22:06, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I must say that the Koala is out of touch with reality, or possibly not cognizant of terminological diffeeence between women and illegitimate. There exist next to no people who dare to claim that women and descent through them would be 'illegitimate'. as of fine line, mr Koala obviously is on the wrong side of any fine line, alleging that descendants via perfectly legitimate women and trgeir marriages woould be illegitimate.. I sincerely hope that Mr Koala stops spreading his very peculiar notions about geneaogy and legitimacy. By the way, the word 'dependent' (instead of descendant) speaks already for the Koala not grasping even the basic terminology in this. 82.181.234.211 (talk) 21:43, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ivangorod

Before you start getting into trouble with your behavior, please take a look at our verifiability policy and the no personal attacks conduct policy.

I have nothing against you adding information to that particular article, but please either source your additions, or at least link to proper articles so there is background. Note that per WP:V "[a]nything that requires but lacks a source may be removed". Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); May 28, 2010; 16:27 (UTC) P.S. Note that the discussion page is not an acceptable source.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); May 28, 2010; 16:29 (UTC)

sane editors question such with a request for source. I have rarely seen such behavior as that of Ezhiki. Obviously, Ezhiki has not even read the discussion page mentioned, as there is mentioned a source in a printed encyclopedia. 82.181.234.211 (talk) 16:31, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:82.181.234.211&oldid=364689123"