User talk:GHcool
|
Good job yourself! Thanks for spearheading edits to the article. Obviously it still needs more expansion and editing. I look forward to working with you on improving it further if you're interested. Cheers! --Al Ameer son (talk) 23:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
question on article
sorry, WHY did you delete that section? not sure i understand. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 17:24, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- It was an extremely minor event. The article deals with big picture stuff. --GHcool (talk) 18:09, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- well, I understand your concern. however I believe that I was elaborating on an item which is very appropriate in its place in the section on peace efforts. i can leave it alone for now though. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 11:47, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- You let Israel have their rocket attack picture, but you won't let Palestine have their refugee picture. Nice. It is surprising that Wikipedia still allows you to edit the Israeli–Palestinian conflict page considering the ignorant rubbish you spout on your own page. I hate to use the term biased, but that is what you are. Lolcab (talk) 20:50, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- If I knew what you were referring to, I might respond. --GHcool (talk) 04:38, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- You do know, and after reading your user page I understand why you would not want Palestinian victims shown alongside Israeli victims, you are sick. Lolcab (talk) 23:48, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- If I knew what you were referring to, I might respond. --GHcool (talk) 04:38, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- You let Israel have their rocket attack picture, but you won't let Palestine have their refugee picture. Nice. It is surprising that Wikipedia still allows you to edit the Israeli–Palestinian conflict page considering the ignorant rubbish you spout on your own page. I hate to use the term biased, but that is what you are. Lolcab (talk) 20:50, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- well, I understand your concern. however I believe that I was elaborating on an item which is very appropriate in its place in the section on peace efforts. i can leave it alone for now though. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 11:47, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
The article The Slave (book) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 20:05, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Kindly put back the 1961 CBS statistics that you just deleted. Zerotalk 01:21, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Please share your knowledge regarding which were the most prominent IDF military operations in the discussion page of that article. TheCuriousGnome (talk) 17:53, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
- I more or less agree with the list you gave. --GHcool (talk) 23:52, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Without inspections?
Isn't this impossible since the cargo has already been inspected? Zuchinni one (talk) 00:37, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- I think the point is that Hamas wants the flotilla folks to come onto Gaza's shores and deliver the aid. Israel cannot allow this because who knows what else the flotilla guys have hidden up their sleeves. Israel insists on being the middle man for obvious reasons. Is there a way we can make this clearer? --GHcool (talk) 06:05, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
"I think the point is that Hamas wants the flotilla folks to come onto Gaza's shores and deliver the aid." You think so??? Do you edit articles when you "think so"? Are you an advocate or spokesman of Israeli government and creating excuses for an attack to a passanger ship on international waters? Is this a discussion forum or an encyclopedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tufankaya (talk • contribs)
- I edit articles when I think they can be improved. I am not a spokesman of the Israeli government. --GHcool (talk) 22:49, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
So you improve articles with your thoughts since you explain and defend your edit with starting "I think..." My idea you also give the source below as "my brain"Tufankaya (talk) 08:47, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
- No need. I use my thoughts to decide whether an edit is appropriate and if I decide that it is, I use a reliable source to back it up. I suggest you try it some time. :) --GHcool (talk) 03:06, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
Whatever, I feel that you are not open to critisize yourself since you take yourself as a "side" at certain articles. You can continue to make up these articles and try to show a certain state as less disrespectful to international laws. It is your personal problem to deal with. Have a nice day and bye.Tufankaya (talk) 22:07, 13 June 2010 (UTC)