Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grovers Law

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mu Gamma (talk | contribs) at 04:47, 22 May 2004. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Zero Google hits, either on web or newsgroups. Claims to be an Internet term, if it actually were it would garner a few hits. - Hephaestos|§ 13:22, 21 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Appears to have been a neologism that nobody else picked up on. Nothing from Google either on the web, or in newsgroups. Teoma finds one unconnected website. Average Earthman 14:49, 21 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge important content with sock puppet, then delete. MathyGuy23 17:08, 21 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. There is no important content. I am compelled to the view that User:MathyGuy23 is a sockpuppet of (IASO) User:Empyrix who created Grover's Law IASO User:68.117.71.101 IASO User:MargarineFly IASO User:38 IASO ... wait for it ... User:Mike Church. Yes, its really just the return of the son of the Ambition troll phenomenon. (Note that according to Grover's Law, I lost the argument several lines back. :) --Tagishsimon --Tagishsimon
  • Delete. 38 19:34, 21 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  • Whether "MathyGuy" is a sock puppet or not, I kind of like his suggestion. Specifically, split the bit on Internet sock puppets into a separate article, and merge some of the "Grover's Law" content into it (minus that term, which doesn't seem to be in common use). Then delete "Grover's Law". - Gwalla 21:05, May 21, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Just delete. -- Cyrius|&#9998 21:12, May 21, 2004 (UTC)
  • Abstain, I don't know enough to make an informed decision. "Grover's Law" is in reference to a claim by a somewhat crazy Internet user (reportedly on antipsychotics) back in 2002 that some large proportion of Internet posts originated from the Sesame Street persona Grover (the blue guy). The specific term "Grover's Law" does not seem to be in common use. By the way: Tagish, you amuse me. Just curious: do you believe in the Masonic conspiracy theories as well? Mu Gamma 04:47, 22 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]