Talk:Edward Elgar/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 16:20, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 16:20, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

I've now read through this article, but have not checked the citations, or the text in any depth. My first impressions are that this is a possible WP:FAC. Nevertheless, this article is a WP:GAN so I will continue my review. As its a comprehensive article, this review is likely to take several days. At this stage I will mostly be highlighting "problems" (if any), so no news is probably good news. Pyrotec (talk) 10:00, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I made a couple of changes of "Elgar" to "Edward Elgar" and "Edward", respectively, in the Biography, Early years, subsection's discussion of him, his parents and syblings - "Elgar" did not seem the right identification for one individual in a family named Elgar. However, I did not change all of them. Pyrotec (talk) 20:44, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Overall summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail: