Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reactions to McCarthyism

Reactions to McCarthyism

Delete. Article is a minor subdivision of a topic. It contains no unique content, so there's no point in merging it with McCarthyism KarlBunker 16:15, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect with/to McCarthyism. It covers topics that aren't in the main article. Also, it cites references; throwing out referenced work seems like a poor idea, especially since McCarthyism itself boasts zero - that's right, a whopping zero - references. If merge and redirect were impossible, I would vote Keep. -Ikkyu2 22:18, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Reactions" has a "further readings" section which would be worth merging with McCarthyism (I'll do that shortly). And if there are any facts buried in the jumbled writing of "Reactions" itself I'll merge that too. But there can't be more than a sentence or two that's worth adding to McCarthyism. Since nothing except a Talk page links to "Reactions", there's no need for a redirect, so it seems a "delete" is the simplest action. KarlBunker 23:03, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

After merging, redirect rather than deleting to preserve the edit history of the material from this page. - squibix 02:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why? The history of this article, like the article itself, is a content-free meaningless jumble. KarlBunker 02:56, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

'Delete as original research. Stifle 15:46, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]