Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pregnancy photography
- Pregnancy photography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Pure WP:OR and WP:ESSAY; no sources at all. — Timneu22 · talk 13:11, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:52, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Borderline advertisement for the artist about a "trend" that does not seem to have any coverage. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 14:52, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Spam for one photographer. — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 17:22, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- Comment: it's worth deleting the photos that were uploaded, too. — Timneu22 · talk 17:25, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- I have gone through the process at commons for the deletion of these images. The discussion page is located at here if you wish to comment. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 23:20, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and all above. freshacconci talktalk 18:08, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Wikidvertising at best.