Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer/Historical

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Angiotensinogen (talk | contribs) at 05:30, 7 July 2010 (Request for Reviewer Rights: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Reviewer (add request)

I am interested in testing out the trial to see if it will be good for the project in the long run. I am a rollbacker and have been editing for about a year and a half, mostly regularly. Outback the koala (talk) 00:34, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneDoRD (talk) 00:47, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to look at the reviewing process in detail, so as to decide whether I think it is a good idea Cardamon (talk) 04:13, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I previously had this right,but was removed due to lack of experience.Now, I have more that 950 edits and I have been on wikipedia forthree months and 8 days.I have also read the Wikipedia Policies. Max Viwe | Wanna chat with me? 07:23, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Please discuss with User:OlEnglish instead of coming here. Courcelles (talk) 07:30, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I understand the policies involved, would be pleased to help out SJK (talk) 09:10, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:35, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm an active editor, understand the relevant policies and would be interested in helping out in the process. I also fight vandalism with Twinkle and having this tool would be useful in pre-empting vandalism. SBC-YPR (talk) 12:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneDoRD (talk) 12:42, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Although I tend to edit articles on topics that interest me, I would like to contribute more and build on the work of the Wikipedia community in more helpful ways. I have familiarised myself with Reviewing, Reviewers and Pending Changes, amongst various policies, and believe that I would be able to contribute as a Reviewer. Sroc (talk) 12:37, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneDoRD (talk) 12:42, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The process seems like a good addition to WP but I would like to actually use it before passing judgement. raseaCtalk to me 13:46, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneDoRD (talk) 13:50, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am a Wikiepdian who mostly monitors pages for vandalism. I have several pages on my watch list involved in the trial. I feel i would be able to assist more if i had reviewer rights Weaponbb7 (talk) 14:02, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneDoRD (talk) 14:12, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've been editing for a while, fighting vandalism wherever I see it, and would be happy to help review. —Kenyon (t·c) 14:22, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneDoRD (talk) 15:57, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Though I admit I've been on wikibreak a few months, I participated in RFCs and informal straw polling this past winter that led up to this trial and I'd like to be able to best participate in discussions of its future as well--this is a defining matter for Wikipedia. I've haunted BLP/N in the past and a check of my history will show past BLP cleanup work with unsourced and dubious edits. Feel free to ask with any questions/concerns. daTheisen(talk) 14:39, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneDoRD (talk) 15:57, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think I could be useful. TEK (talke-mail) 16:41, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneDoRD (talk) 17:02, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I hope, I qualify to the criteria for becoming a reviewer. I think this new feature will help me contributing to Wikipedia in more helpful way.-- Ranjithsutari (talk) 17:07, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneDoRD (talk) 17:09, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've read the guideline on reviewing, Wikipedia's policy on vandalism, and understand what is and what is not vandalism. I'm familiar with the basic content policies: Biographies of living persons, Neutral point of view, No original research, Verifiability and What Wikipedia is not. I also routinely edit, and have a reasonable editing history. McYel (talk) 17:58, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
{{done}}DoRD (talk) 21:28, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done - revoked the above due to growing concerns about this user. —DoRD (talk) 22:38, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm editing a few articles in the "reviewer" test, and would like to familiarize myself with the proposed process. Thanks! JeffJonez (talk) 21:23, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneDoRD (talk) 21:28, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Reviewer Rights

I am a long-standing member of Wikipedia (since 2003) and would like to be able to take part in the pending changes trial. Angio (talk) 05:30, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]