Jump to content

Talk:Centering prayer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Presearch (talk | contribs) at 18:06, 11 July 2010 (Interfacing with other pages, and conveying scope of interest: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Articles for deletion

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 January 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. An archived record of this discussion can be found here.

Punkmorten 11:39, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I removed lines lacking citation from the Intro which sayed that centering prayer is contrary to the teaching of the saints and lines from the Practice section which sayed that RC's and anyone who wants to grow closer to God should avoid practicing centering prayer. I did so mostly because it seemed to me that they would be more appropriate in a "Reactions to" section and I don't really know how to create such a section.

The edit I'm explaining was the second edit done on April 7, 2008.

Interfacing with other pages, and conveying scope of interest

I recently inserted some material about how Centering Prayer is 1) described by a book that sold huge numbers of copies, and is 2) the basis of an organization for its dissemination. Both of these are indicators that help to convey to the reader the level of interest and awareness that exists about Centering Prayer. I would maintain that the article is incomplete, and remains less informative, if it does not convey this information. JonHarder reverted those additions, saying in the change log that the added material "basically introduces another article and a book [and] can be done more concisely by using standard 'See also' and 'Further reading' entries". However, JonHarder's changes also make the article less informative by removing sourced information that conveyed those two aspects of the scope of interest/awareness of CP. A bit of overlap between different WP articles is common and often needed for good exposition. Therefore, on this basis, I am restoring the material. JonHoarder, if you disagree with this reasoning, perhaps you could explain here on this talk page? Thanks -- Health Researcher (talk) 18:06, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PS. As there is currently no separate page for the book, there seems no less reason for citing the translations here (topic page) as at Basil Pennington (author page). Health Researcher (talk) 18:06, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]