User talk:Dismas

Welcome!

When posting to my talk page, I have a couple of things that I would like you to keep in mind:

1. When starting a new discussion, please put it in its own section. The easiest way to do this is the click on the "new section" tab at the top of the page and then give the discussion a title.
2. Please be specific. Comments like "Why did you make that edit?" will get us both nowhere. Which edit? To what article?
3. I generally answer on your talk page unless your page says that you'll watch mine for a response.
4. And finally, please sign your comments. You can do this by putting four tildes at the end of your comments like this: ~~~~

Thanks, Dismas|^(talk)

Speedy deletion of Priya Rai

Hello Dismas, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Priya Rai, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:98.158.123.67. This has been done because the page seems to be about a person, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:98.158.123.67. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of 98.158.123.67 (talk · contribs) 02:15, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Kelly Carrington

I have nominated Kelly Carrington, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Carrington (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Off2riorob (talk) 12:56, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Kassie Lyn Logsdon

Hi, I see you wrote this Kassie Lyn Logsdon she isn't notable since the porn bio change, I am wondering are you still creating such stubs? Off2riorob (talk) 16:05, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Why don't you check the creation dates of the articles. Then you can report me to WP:ANI. Go for it! Crush the spread of information! Dismas|^(talk) 23:32, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

I don't want to report you to anybody, I was just asking you a question, is that how you see me as someone who wants to resist the educational spread of information about playboy models? Whatever. Off2riorob (talk) 23:36, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

I see you as someone with very little to do. Don't say "Whatever". This crusade obviously means something to you. Dismas|^(talk) 23:42, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

I have a lot more to do than create stubs of not notable playboy playmates. This is just about policy and guidelines to me. I appreciate that you are interested in this subject but policy and guidelines and consensus are moving away from such content inclusion. The wikipedia is not like some kind of data dump of all sorts of not notable and irrelevant content that is hosted at other locations. Off2riorob (talk) 00:18, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

I have a lot more to do than create lists for all the articles that you're deleting and copying the info over. You're just creating more work that wasn't necessary. Dismas|^(talk) 00:49, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Kassie Lyn Logsdon

I have nominated Kassie Lyn Logsdon, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kassie Lyn Logsdon. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Off2riorob (talk) 16:29, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Heather Rae Young

I have nominated Heather Rae Young, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heather Rae Young. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Off2riorob (talk) 16:30, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Dasha Astafieva

I have nominated Dasha Astafieva, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dasha Astafieva. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Off2riorob (talk) 16:42, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Candice Cassidy

I have nominated Candice Cassidy, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candice Cassidy. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Off2riorob (talk) 16:45, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Jennifer and Natalie Jo Campbell

I have nominated Jennifer and Natalie Jo Campbell, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer and Natalie Jo Campbell. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Off2riorob (talk) 00:58, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Patrice Hollis

I have nominated Patrice Hollis, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrice Hollis. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Off2riorob (talk) 01:13, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Something for your visit to my talkpage

Try not to make a mess! BTW, I noticed that you're a helpdesk regular. On my talkpage above your post, I want to build a userpage button for the CAL Delta TF using this picture:

CAL Delta TF

That is the basic box with CA DTF wikilinked. Now, I want to put a picture of a Bear to the left:

There's more than a cookie in this for you if it can be placed anywhere on a talkpage. --Morenooso (talk) 05:13, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

---

Morenooso has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

You got beat to the punch. Another user showed me how to build the userbox which is now on my userpage and wikilinks to the wikiproject page. --Morenooso (talk) 07:42, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

The Rescue From Deletion Award

		Rescue From Deletion Barnstar
		In recognition of your posts which may have saved several Playboy Playmate articles tonight. --Morenooso (talk) 06:07, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Playmate lists

Hi Dismas-- I'll volunteer to chip in on a year or two for these lists you've been working on. Do you have a list of lists so I can see what has and hasn't been done yet? (Hoping there are openings in the '60s and early '70s, as that will provide a nice trip down mammary lane, but I'm willing to work on any of them.) Regards. Dekkappai (talk) 17:20, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll look at what you've done and model the new ones on that. I'll do what I can tonight & this weekend. Dekkappai (talk) 19:45, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

I did a test run with List of Playboy Playmates of 1961. Let me know if there are any glaring errors. (I just copy/pasted text & infoboxes). Otherwise I'll forge ahead like this over the weekend. Cheers! Dekkappai (talk) 20:21, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

You deserve this!

The Refdesk Barnstar Thanks for cow hitch -- exactly what I needed! DRosenbach (Talk

Playboy Playmate lists tagged for speedy deletion

Hi Dismas. If there was any question what this "Playmates are not notable" line was all about, this should answer the question. Total "I don't like it" cleansing of the topic. Dekkappai (talk) 22:23, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

deleting correct info

Please mind your own business and stop emailing me. You never even worked with Alexis and your negative comments are not wanted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Msullivan777 (talk • contribs) 00:51, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Re: Your sig line

Well that makes the shortest period that I've had a particular signature! So it goes. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 22:52, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Courteney Cox IMDb

IMDb is credible. If it wasnt, it would not be listed under Courteney Cox's "External links", nor that of every other celebrity. If you really feel this is wrong, then I suggest you remove IMDb from every celebrity's pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BhamAla (talk • contribs)

Image kerfluffle

Just giving you a heads-up that a large number of images have been pulled from Commons that are sexual in nature, and a number of them were later found to have been in use. I'm contacting you as you're one of the more active editors on the adult stuff here. If you could watch for red-links and give me a heads up on any that you see so I can see about restoring it, I'd appreciate it. Tabercil (talk) 23:13, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Candida Royalle school citation.

As I mentioned Candida definitely attended the High School of Art and Design, and the others. I don't understand "protecting the schools". If Calvin Klein had a wikipedia page, or others on our Notable Alumni list, would they have to put a citation there, too? I mean anyone can claim to have attended a school, so everyone should have to prove it. But how does someone prove it -- get a note from the school's administration saying "so and so attended the school or graduated from the school?" In any event Candida Royalle is not her real name (I have met her myself, twice). She graduated in 1968. She wants her privacy respected so she won't print it. Yvonnefitz (talk) 04:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Ida Ljungqvist

If your gonna write things about me, please use accurate information, seriously. That is me Joshua Reed Lang and yes Ida Kristine Ljungqvist was my wife. Joss Lange is my birth name. I get so many messages on facebook and myspace from all this info on here and the internet and would like to clarify once and for all. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by RealJRLang (talk • contribs) 19:39, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your response, to be honest I am not Wikipedia literate in terms of doing all this stuff on here. Yes I am 100 percent Mr. Lang. No BS. I guess i could post my e-mail then communicate via phone or whatever, to clean this page up, let me know thnx —Preceding unsigned comment added by RealJRLang (talk • contribs) 17:50, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

I added how long we were together before I married Ida to CLARIFY I didn't just know her and divorce her after 1 year. That looks stupid we were together 6 full years included with marriage. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RealJRLang (talk • contribs) 06:34, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Vicky Vette

You undid an entier early section that was not COPY Protected or in Fault in any way but came from an extensive interview that was done years ago when she first started out!

Patron Saint, you ain't! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Db54 (talk • contribs) 22:34, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

thanks for your response. I've have sent it to her so she can come post it directly, when she has the time. Since I know both her and her current husband I am sure they will take issue with your interpretation of NonNotable Awards. Likewise, the information was not word for word as it only relayed her viewpoint. The information on her in WikPedia is deplorable and lacking in so many ways. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Db54 (talk • contribs)

Ought to be interesting on how she proves her identity... but here is the link to the blog I just posted about this http://www.vickyathome.com/members/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=4212 but you'd have to be a member of her site to read it... but I can assure you that she does not think in any manner, shape or form that her winning the Booble award in 2008 is a non-notable. Db54 (talk) 11:31, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Just heard back as she reponds with great reqularity with her Sr. Members - As a Result, I have give you, Dismas, all the credit on this! and I quote, "stickyvicky Post subject: Re: Wikpedia on VettePosted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 11:36 am Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 9:41 am Posts: 7717 How strange the page is almost empty, looks like someone stripped it! The link to the yahoo group is wrong, and there are barely any other links. there are a million interviews and articles on avn, but they don't list any of them... what a mess!" Db54 (talk) 16:17, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Just created an award noting the Booble award, it's payout which is equivalent if not more than Freeones as well as who booble is. However, am having some problems with the citation script and SOME HELP would be appreciated till I get the hang of this thing. Db54 (talk) 18:29, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Appreciate the assist - there are a number of AVN references on booble attributed to the wins. Corrected the 1st link and figured out that the date part of the syntax is important. How is the title inserted for each of the references. Booble Award is notable. Db54 (talk) 22:59, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Yes the dialogue becomes less testy when after spending an exoborant amount of time editing (& trying to figure out syntaxes) only to have it reversed. It's probably not a fun oversight job either. Whenever there is a question on Vette - just ask as I go right to the source. Also appreciate the crash course so I know enough to be dangerous. The Award section is good to go so if you wouldn't mind reinserting it... then I can go about other informational updates. Speaking of Booble, it gets alot of press especially the Annual winner when you have the Likes of Tera Patrick, Jenna Jamesons and other adult star heavyweights slugging it out.

Don't disagree with some that you say on Adult stars, Many at the upper echelon, like Vette, however are on a different level and know the business inside out. She is the only way that has recently filed a law suit against Rapidshare for providing "unauthorized" sharing content. Sound familiar - Recording Industry and Napster. Db54 (talk) 09:33, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

"I removed the info about Booble from Vette's article. I did this because information on what Booble or their award is should be in an article about them (if they themselves are notable enough, again third party references are key)." Thought that might be the case. I left in there in case anyone wanted to pick up creating that entry. The Booble site receives a tremendous amount of internet traffic and it's monthly contest is a mere buildup to it's annual contest crescendo. thanks for the assists. Db54 (talk) 06:22, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

On another note, I see you or somehone has again removed the verbiage on her last name! Why? I received that information DIRECTLY from Vette on her Membership site and also noted she did not understand why the 1st reference never mind the latest one was removed, which I have been a senior member for sometime. How do we fix or protest (and to whom) these changes as I can't keep adding information received directly only to have someone constantly removing them. Db54 (talk) 06:27, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

On the vette explanation, i provided one that supported the original wording that didn't pass muster. It appears it was completely sustainable according to Vette who then provided me, on her members board, with that direct quote! When I usually receive something direct from Vicky or Dave (current husband & mgr) it is typically accurate. Some of the other Sr. Members seem to feel I am swimming uphill and suggest the efforts head to sexpedia. Haven't given up yet but this oversight, while understandable, is extremely overbearing Db54 (talk) 06:21, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

She has done a number of them as well as awards and I don't think understands or realizes just how difficult it is to post valid information. She has done numerous interviews as well as releases. I cited one earlier on how she came by choosing her last name... You did not like the source I originally provided which supported the original information and now nor a direct quote... "I love corvettes, always wanted one, they are fast and curvy sexy like a woman's body, and looks better with the top down! lol.. I have no idea why they took that down." Another shorter one back in 2003 http://blog.freeones.com/2007/07/16/exclusive-interview-with-vicky-vette/ but regardless, I don't do this for a LIVING. I am simply trying to improve upon what little information, regardless of reason, exists. The oversight here is borderline rediculous as I can understand why many just give up! Db54 (talk) 08:51, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

here is yet another reference http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Vicky_Vette with regards to her chosen last name that she has embellished upon that I provided right outta the proverbial "horses" mouth. They seem to be much more focused on getting non controversial information - alot more than wikpedia at the moment! Db54 (talk) 00:31, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Re: Sunny Leone

I noticed that you removed a paragraph from Sunny Leone, stating that is non-notable spam. Since the information added contributed towards the biography of this individual by noting relevant recent events in which she was involved, I believe it is worthy of mention in the article. The fact that it was written from a neutral point of view also means it's certainly not "spam". Unless the reference included with the information was bogus, I don't see any reason to delete it, and have just reinstated it. Is there a specific concern you have with this content? If so, please discuss this on the article's talk page and/or reply here. Thanks. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 18:18, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

I see the reason for the concern now; I've noticed that both references added are links to a store selling these DVDs. While I agree that more suitable references could be chosen, the information was clearly not written as an advertisement, and links of this nature are permitted by policy as long as they add meaningful content to the article, which I believe they do. If you are concerned about the fact that these references lead to a store, the best course of action would be to find sources elsewhere and replace the references with them. There doesn't seem to be any reason to doubt that these references are reliable. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 18:21, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Jean Louisa Kelly

I hope so too! --Susfele (talk) 23:38, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

• Yay! Semi-protected! Did you ask for that? Well done. Susfele (talk) 01:57, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Double revert

Sorry for the double revert. I usually rollback via the site, and then click on 'revert' in sticki to move on to the next edit. You must have caught me just between the two actions.

In any case, I wanted to let you know I've re-added the atheist category to Bree Olsen. This was previously referenced on the page, but was removed as irrelevant. The category, on the other hand, is not. I've added a short description of her religious convictions with a ref to support the category. If you have any issues with the current revision, I'd be happy to discuss further on the talk page. Thanks Jess ^talk _cs 05:17, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

International Organization of Biological Control

I'm confused, was the typo in the subject line of International Organization of Biological Control corrected? It was spelled 'Blological' instead of 'Biological'. I dont' know how I can correct it myself.PhyllisWeintraub (talk) 18:33, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

John Wayne Gacy

--Digby scallops (talk) 22:41, 29 May 2010 (UTC)Thank you for your input and reverting the In Film section deletion made on the Gacy page. While I understand the concerns expressed in the embedded text on the page, I believe the film references have relevence and deserve to remain on articles such as Gacy's.

Gilmour/Samson

Thanks for your feedback. I am associated with the management company for David Gilmour and Polly Samson. While it is traditional to have a lowercase 'a' and 'i' in these titles, they are actually correct as Live In and On An, so please let's revert to that format. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JABEYE (talk • contribs) 09:34, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Stephanie Adams

Someone at 98.218.211.133 has repeatedly removed sourced statements (and their accompanying reference) from the Stephanie Adams article.

The accompanying reference is quite clear in its support for those statements (imo).

I'm seeing this as simple vandalism; the user in question has never edited anything else... But I noticed you'd reverted this once, so I thought I'd get your opinion before I reverted it for a second time.

Thanks... Valrith (talk) 02:57, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

usertalk:69.19.14.17

Could you or another admin look at usertalk:69.19.14.17? The user is trying to address Materialscientist and created a talkpage. ----moreno oso (talk) 03:10, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Here is the page: User talk:Material scientist. ----moreno oso (talk) 03:12, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Kelly Gallagher

I was shocked to find no page for Gallagher until I found it had been moved to Kelly Wearstler. Have I missed something? As far as I can tell she has no notability under that name... Valrith (talk) 00:38, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Well, there is a Kelly Gallagher article. It's a disambig page with only one blue link. I'm not sure what you're getting at though. Are you saying that her article, if we are to have one, should be under Gallagher even though she has more recently appeared on television and such as Wearstler? I haven't looked but I would think that being the judge of a show for two seasons would generate enough coverage for GNG or ENT. Dismas|^(talk) 00:55, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm not especially clear on what the guidelines are for what name should be used for an article about a person who has used more than one name, truly. Yes, I was trying to say the article should be under Gallagher, since we have little evidence she's notable as a designer. No, I wouldn't think being on a TV show would be sufficient to establish notability, but whatever. I'm not that invested. Thanks... Valrith (talk) 01:03, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Shyla Foxx

That edit of mine you just undid has to be some sort of a glitch. All I was doing was removing the unsourced "measurements" from the infobox. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 14:33, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer!

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. All the Best, Mifter (talk) 13:31, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Michael Segedy

You know the position of Michael Segedy page. I think I should rather do a page on his only book Hampton Road (whose cover you rightly removed from the page). Please google for citations and let me know is the notability adequate for a page. Regards  Jon Ascton  (talk) 01:18, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

By the way, there is a 1927 politicol block buster called Mother India (book) by Katherine Mayo awaiting us to be wikified. Do ya think there are enough citations etc. for the thing to be bothered about ?  Jon Ascton  (talk) 08:33, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Eagle program for circuit design

Hi, I'm trying to use Eagle to draw my circuits (thanks for the suggestion) but I've no idea how to find the component to indicate my alternating current power source (a circle with a tilde in it). I've tried searching the library for generator, dynamo, alternating etc but turned up nothing. Any idea what the component would be called? Thanks. --92.28.80.71 (talk) 18:46, 12 July 2010 (UTC)